The ANTENATAL multicentre study to predict postnatal renal outcome in fetuses with posterior urethral valves: objectives and design

Abstract Background Posterior urethral valves (PUV) account for 17% of paediatric end-stage renal disease. A major issue in the management of PUV is prenatal prediction of postnatal renal function. Fetal ultrasound and fetal urine biochemistry are currently employed for this prediction, but clearly lack precision. We previously developed a fetal urine peptide signature that predicted in utero with high precision postnatal renal function in fetuses with PUV. We describe here the objectives and design of the prospective international multicentre ANTENATAL (multicentre validation of a fetal urine peptidome-based classifier to predict postnatal renal function in posterior urethral valves) study, set up to validate this fetal urine peptide signature. Methods Participants will be PUV pregnancies enrolled from 2017 to 2021 and followed up until 2023 in >30 European centres endorsed and supported by European reference networks for rare urological disorders (ERN eUROGEN) and rare kidney diseases (ERN ERKNet). The endpoint will be renal/patient survival at 2 years postnatally. Assuming α = 0.05, 1–β = 0.8 and a mean prevalence of severe renal outcome in PUV individuals of 0.35, 400 patients need to be enrolled to validate the previously reported sensitivity and specificity of the peptide signature. Results In this largest multicentre study of antenatally detected PUV, we anticipate bringing a novel tool to the clinic. Based on urinary peptides and potentially amended in the future with additional omics traits, this tool will be able to precisely quantify postnatal renal survival in PUV pregnancies. The main limitation of the employed approach is the need for specialized equipment. Conclusions Accurate risk assessment in the prenatal period should strongly improve the management of fetuses with PUV

Contribution à la prise en charge du laparoschisis de diagnostic anténatal (à propos de 18 cas ; revue de la littérature)

BREST-BU Médecine-Odontologie (290192102) / SudocPARIS-BIUM (751062103) / SudocSudocFranceF

Anti-reflux surgery in children with congenital diaphragmatic hernia: A prospective cohort study on a controversial practice

Introduction: Gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) is the most frequent long-term morbidity of congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) survivors. Performing a preventive fundoplication during CDH repair remains controversial. This study aimed to: (1) Analyze the variability in practices regarding preventive fundoplication; (2) Identify predictive factors for fundoplication. (3) Evaluate the impact of preventive fundoplication on gastro-intestinal outcomes in children with a CDH patch repair; METHODS: This prospective multi-institutional cohort study (French CDH Registry) included CDH neonates born in France between January 1st, 2010-December 31st, 2018. Patch CDH was defined as need for synthetic patch or muscle flap repair. Main outcome measures included need for curative fundoplication, tube feed supplementation, failure to thrive, and oral aversion. Results: Of 762 CDH neonates included, 81 underwent fundoplication (10.6%), either preventive or curative. Median follow-up was 3.0 years (IQR: 1.0-5.0). (1) Preventive fundoplication is considered in only 31% of centers. The rates of both curative fundoplication (9% vs 3%, p = 0.01) and overall fundoplication (20% vs 3%, p < 0.0001) are higher in centers that perform preventive fundoplication compared to those that do not. (2) Predictive factors for preventive fundoplication were: prenatal diagnosis (p = 0.006), intra-thoracic liver (p = 0.005), fetal tracheal occlusion (p = 0.002), CDH-grade C-D (p < 0.0001), patch repair (p < 0.0001). After CDH repair, 8% (n = 51) required curative fundoplication (median age: 101 days), for which a patch repair was the only independent predictive factors identified upon multivariate analysis. (3) In neonates with patch CDH, preventive fundoplication did not decrease the need for curative fundoplication (15% vs 11%, p = 0.53), and was associated with higher rates of failure to thrive (discharge: 81% vs 51%, p = 0.03; 6-months: 81% vs 45%, p = 0.008), tube feeds (6-months: 50% vs 21%, p = 0.02; 2-years: 65% vs 26%, p = 0.004), and oral aversion (6-months: 67% vs 37%, p = 0.02; 1-year: 71% vs 40%, p = 0.03). Conclusions: Children undergoing a CDH patch repair are at high risk of requiring a curative fundoplication. However, preventive fundoplication during a patch repair does not decrease the need for curative fundoplication and is associated with worse gastro-intestinal outcomes in children