Main GO categories in the annotation of 230 potential gene duplications in cassava

<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Sequencing analysis of 20,000 full-length cDNA clones from cassava reveals lineage specific expansions in gene families related to stress response"</p><p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2229/7/66</p><p>BMC Plant Biology 2007;7():66-66.</p><p>Published online 20 Dec 2007</p><p>PMCID:PMC2245942.</p><p></p

Comparison of the annotation of 6566 cassava sequences with putative one-to-one orthologs and 4313 sequences without

<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Sequencing analysis of 20,000 full-length cDNA clones from cassava reveals lineage specific expansions in gene families related to stress response"</p><p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2229/7/66</p><p>BMC Plant Biology 2007;7():66-66.</p><p>Published online 20 Dec 2007</p><p>PMCID:PMC2245942.</p><p></p> The Gene Ontology terms overrepresented and under represented (p-value < 0.05) for the sequences shared between cassava and or are presented according to legend. GO terms related to stress response are frequent among cassava genes without one-to-one orthologs in any of these three species. 302 redundant sequences produced by CAP3 were included in the analysis

Schematic overview of the computational and experimental contributions of COMBREX and its users, and the interrelationships of these contributions.

<p>Data and results specific to COMBREX are shown in boxes. External data imported into COMBREX are also shown, with arrows indicating entry points into the cycle. Methodology employed by COMBREX and its users is shown in blue type, as it is used to generate data. Not shown are two critical contributions to COMBREX: genome and cluster data imported from NCBI RefSeq and ProtClustDB, respectively, and NIH funding, which enables the grants that COMBREX issues to experimental laboratories.</p

Definitions of COMBREX functional status symbols and fractions of microbial genes in COMBREX in each status category.

<p>Experimentally characterized proteins are <i>green</i>. (Those in the <i>green</i> set that have been manually curated by the GSDB are also marked with a gold “G.”) Proteins with functional predictions but no experimental evidence are <i>blue</i>. Proteins with no available functional predictions are <i>black</i>.</p