28 research outputs found
Differential Gene Repertoire in Mycobacterium ulcerans Identifies Candidate Genes for Patho-Adaptation
The emerging human disease Buruli ulcer, caused by Mycobacterium ulcerans, is of increasing challenge for public health systems in many countries, mainly in West and Central sub-Saharan Africa. Genetic differentiation of patient isolates, a prerequisite for scientific studies on and intervention of disease transmission and dispersal, is hampered by an exceptional lack of genetic diversity within this species. Comparative genomics on M. ulcerans of worldwide geographical origin has already allowed for distinguishing several haplotypes separated into two distinct lineages. Differences in prevalence and incidence of Buruli ulcer were already suspected, but biological relevance for this was unclear. Here, we show newly identified hot spot regions of genomic instability, a biased silencing of coding sequences belonging to distinct functional groups, and a differential gene repertoire across M. ulcerans strains. Gene inactivation mediated by different mechanisms in M. ulcerans adds to the concept of anti-virulence genes observed in an increasing number of bacterial species. According to this concept, loss of such genesāin addition to gain of functionāmay confer a selective advantage for a pathogen radiating into a new niche. In the case of M. ulcerans, a distinct set of disrupted genes may enhance virulence, particularly in the classical lineage
A three-country comparison of psychotropic medication prevalence in youth
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The study aims to compare cross-national prevalence of psychotropic medication use in youth.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A population-based analysis of psychotropic medication use based on administrative claims data for the year 2000 was undertaken for insured enrollees from 3 countries in relation to age group (0ā4, 5ā9, 10ā14, and 15ā19), gender, drug subclass pattern and concomitant use. The data include insured youth aged 0ā19 in the year 2000 from the Netherlands (n = 110,944), Germany (n = 356,520) and the United States (n = 127,157).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The annual prevalence of any psychotropic medication in youth was significantly greater in the US (6.7%) than in the Netherlands (2.9%) and in Germany (2.0%). Antidepressant and stimulant prevalence were 3 or more times greater in the US than in the Netherlands and Germany, while antipsychotic prevalence was 1.5ā2.2 times greater. The atypical antipsychotic subclass represented only 5% of antipsychotic use in Germany, but 48% in the Netherlands and 66% in the US. The less commonly used drugs e.g. alpha agonists, lithium and antiparkinsonian agents generally followed the ranking of US>Dutch>German youth with very rare (less than 0.05%) use in Dutch and German youth. Though rarely used, anxiolytics were twice as common in Dutch as in US and German youth. Prescription hypnotics were half as common as anxiolytics in Dutch and US youth and were very uncommon in German youth. Concomitant drug use applied to 19.2% of US youth which was more than double the Dutch use and three times that of German youth.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Prominent differences in psychotropic medication treatment patterns exist between youth in the US and Western Europe and within Western Europe. Differences in policies regarding direct to consumer drug advertising, government regulatory restrictions, reimbursement policies, diagnostic classification systems, and cultural beliefs regarding the role of medication for emotional and behavioral treatment are likely to account for these differences.</p
European clinical guidelines for Tourette syndrome and other tic disorders. Part II: pharmacological treatment
To develop a European guideline on pharmacologic treatment of Tourette syndrome (TS) the available literature was thoroughly screened and extensively discussed by a working group of the European Society for the Study of Tourette syndrome (ESSTS). Although there are many more studies on pharmacotherapy of TS than on behavioral treatment options, only a limited number of studies meets rigorous quality criteria. Therefore, we have devised a two-stage approach. First, we present the highest level of evidence by reporting the findings of existing Cochrane reviews in this field. Subsequently, we provide the first comprehensive overview of all reports on pharmacological treatment options for TS through a MEDLINE, PubMed, and EMBASE search for all studies that document the effect of pharmacological treatment of TS and other tic disorders between 1970 and November 2010. We present a summary of the current consensus on pharmacological treatment options for TS in Europe to guide the clinician in daily practice. This summary is, however, rather a status quo of a clinically helpful but merely low evidence guideline, mainly driven by expert experience and opinion, since rigorous experimental studies are scarce