citation_fetish.pdf

Presentation given at ReCon 201

Cross-border Collaboration for Scholarship

“Cross-border Collaboration for Scholarship” presented by Geoffrey Bilder (Crossref) at the Joint Global Infrastructure Conference co-hosted by Crossref, DataCite, and ORCID at the Korea Chamber of Commerce & Industry on 15 June 2017

Perceived technical benefit associated with the introduction of a new technology in relation to technical expertise.

<p>Perceived technical benefit of the introduction of a new technology in relation to technical expertise.</p

Perceived benefit vs technical risk associated with the introduction of a new technology in relation to technical expertise.

<p>Dynamics are bad. Group A & C have similar world views, but for completely different reasons. Group B is stuck with implimenting, but doesn't see eye-to-eye with A or C.</p

Perceived technical risk associated with the introduction of a new technology in relation to technical expertise.

<p>Perceived technical risk associated with the introduction of a new technology in relation to technical expertise.</p

What exactly is infrastructure? Seeing the leopard's spots

<p>We ducked a fundamental question raised by our proposal for infrastructure principles: “what exactly counts as infrastructure?” Of course this is not a straightforward question and part of the reason for leaving it in untouched in the introductory post. We believe that any definition must entail a much broader discussion from the community. But we wanted to kick this off with a discussion of an important part of the infrastructure puzzle that we think is often missed. That the infrastructure we should care most about is often a layer below where our attention is focused.</p

Committee: ORCID Privacy Committee

The remit of the privacy committee was to identify and review privacy issues in light of emergent business model, system development, and ORCID Principles, and recommend Privacy Policies to Board for adoption subject to legal vetting

Recommendations of the ORCID Multiple Assertions Working Group

The Multiple Assertions Working Group (2014) was charged with developing recommendations for policies, business rules, and technology to manage multiple assertions in the ORCID registry. These are their findings and recommendations