Accumulation of dendritic cells and increased CCL20 levels in the airways of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

RATIONALE: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterized by chronic airway inflammation. It is unclear if dendritic cells (DC) participate in this inflammatory process. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the presence of DC in small airways of patients with COPD. METHODS: We evaluated DC infiltration in small airways by immunohistochemistry in patients with COPD (stage I-IV), never-smokers, and smokers without COPD. Chemokine ligand 20 (CCL20, the most potent chemokine in attracting DC) was determined in total lung by RT-PCR and in induced sputum by enzyme-linked immunsorbent assay. Chemokine receptor 6 (CCR6, the receptor for CCL20) expression on human pulmonary DC was evaluated by RT-PCR and flow cytometry. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: There is a significant increase in DC number in the epithelium (p = 0.007) and adventitia (p = 0.009) of small airways of patients with COPD compared with never-smokers and smokers without COPD. DC number in epithelium and adventitia increases along with disease severity. CCL20 mRNA expression in total lung and CCL20 protein levels in induced sputum are significantly higher in patients with COPD compared with never-smokers (p = 0.034 for CCL20 mRNA and p = 0.0008 for CCL20 protein) and smokers without COPD (p = 0.016 for CCL20 mRNA and p = 0.001 for CCL20 protein). DC isolated from human lung express CCR6 both at mRNA and at protein level. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first description of airway infiltration by DC in COPD. Moreover, interaction between CCL20 and CCR6 provides a possible mechanism for accumulation of DC in the lungs in COPD.status: publishe

Effects of potent neutralizing antibodies from convalescent plasma in patients hospitalized for severe SARS-CoV-2 infection

In a randomized clinical trial of 86 hospitalized COVID-19 patients comparing standard care to treatment with 300mL convalescent plasma containing high titers of neutralizing SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, no overall clinical benefit was observed. Using a comprehensive translational approach, we unravel the virological and immunological responses following treatment to disentangle which COVID-19 patients may benefit and should be the focus of future studies. Convalescent plasma is safe, does not improve survival, has no effect on the disease course, nor does plasma enhance viral clearance in the respiratory tract, influence SARS-CoV-2 antibody development or serum proinflammatory cytokines levels. Here, we show that the vast majority of patients already had potent neutralizing SARS-CoV-2 antibodies at hospital admission and with comparable titers to carefully selected plasma donors. This resulted in the decision to terminate the trial prematurely. Treatment with convalescent plasma should be studied early in the disease course or at least preceding autologous humoral response development

Effects of potent neutralizing antibodies from convalescent plasma in patients hospitalized for severe SARS-CoV-2 infection

In a randomized clinical trial of 86 hospitalized COVID-19 patients comparing standard care to treatment with 300mL convalescent plasma containing high titers of neutralizing SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, no overall clinical benefit was observed. Using a comprehensive translational approach, we unravel the virological and immunological responses following treatment to disentangle which COVID-19 patients may benefit and should be the focus of future studies. Convalescent plasma is safe, does not improve survival, has no effect on the disease course, nor does plasma enhance viral clearance in the respiratory tract, influence SARS-CoV-2 antibody development or serum proinflammatory cytokines levels. Here, we show that the vast majority of patients already had potent neutralizing SARS-CoV-2 antibodies at hospital admission and with comparable titers to carefully selected plasma donors. This resulted in the decision to terminate the trial prematurely. Treatment with convalescent plasma should be studied early in the disease course or at least preceding autologous humoral response development.</p

Effects of potent neutralizing antibodies from convalescent plasma in patients hospitalized for severe SARS-CoV-2 infection

In a randomized clinical trial of 86 hospitalized COVID-19 patients comparing standard care to treatment with 300mL convalescent plasma containing high titers of neutralizing SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, no overall clinical benefit was observed. Using a comprehensive translational approach, we unravel the virological and immunological responses following treatment to disentangle which COVID-19 patients may benefit and should be the focus of future studies. Convalescent plasma is safe, does not improve survival, has no effect on the disease course, nor does plasma enhance viral clearance in the respiratory tract, influence SARS-CoV-2 antibody development or serum proinflammatory cytokines levels. Here, we show that the vast majority of patients already had potent neutralizing SARS-CoV-2 antibodies at hospital admission and with comparable titers to carefully selected plasma donors. This resulted in the decision to terminate the trial prematurely. Treatment with convalescent plasma should be studied early in the disease course or at least preceding autologous humoral response development