76 research outputs found
Quantifying the effects of data augmentation and stain color normalization in convolutional neural networks for computational pathology
Stain variation is a phenomenon observed when distinct pathology laboratories
stain tissue slides that exhibit similar but not identical color appearance.
Due to this color shift between laboratories, convolutional neural networks
(CNNs) trained with images from one lab often underperform on unseen images
from the other lab. Several techniques have been proposed to reduce the
generalization error, mainly grouped into two categories: stain color
augmentation and stain color normalization. The former simulates a wide variety
of realistic stain variations during training, producing stain-invariant CNNs.
The latter aims to match training and test color distributions in order to
reduce stain variation. For the first time, we compared some of these
techniques and quantified their effect on CNN classification performance using
a heterogeneous dataset of hematoxylin and eosin histopathology images from 4
organs and 9 pathology laboratories. Additionally, we propose a novel
unsupervised method to perform stain color normalization using a neural
network. Based on our experimental results, we provide practical guidelines on
how to use stain color augmentation and stain color normalization in future
computational pathology applications.Comment: Accepted in the Medical Image Analysis journa
Context-aware stacked convolutional neural networks for classification of breast carcinomas in whole-slide histopathology images
Automated classification of histopathological whole-slide images (WSI) of
breast tissue requires analysis at very high resolutions with a large
contextual area. In this paper, we present context-aware stacked convolutional
neural networks (CNN) for classification of breast WSIs into normal/benign,
ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), and invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). We first
train a CNN using high pixel resolution patches to capture cellular level
information. The feature responses generated by this model are then fed as
input to a second CNN, stacked on top of the first. Training of this stacked
architecture with large input patches enables learning of fine-grained
(cellular) details and global interdependence of tissue structures. Our system
is trained and evaluated on a dataset containing 221 WSIs of H&E stained breast
tissue specimens. The system achieves an AUC of 0.962 for the binary
classification of non-malignant and malignant slides and obtains a three class
accuracy of 81.3% for classification of WSIs into normal/benign, DCIS, and IDC,
demonstrating its potentials for routine diagnostics
A Survey on Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis
Deep learning algorithms, in particular convolutional networks, have rapidly
become a methodology of choice for analyzing medical images. This paper reviews
the major deep learning concepts pertinent to medical image analysis and
summarizes over 300 contributions to the field, most of which appeared in the
last year. We survey the use of deep learning for image classification, object
detection, segmentation, registration, and other tasks and provide concise
overviews of studies per application area. Open challenges and directions for
future research are discussed.Comment: Revised survey includes expanded discussion section and reworked
introductory section on common deep architectures. Added missed papers from
before Feb 1st 201
Comparison of Different Methods for Tissue Segmentation in Histopathological Whole-Slide Images
Tissue segmentation is an important pre-requisite for efficient and accurate
diagnostics in digital pathology. However, it is well known that whole-slide
scanners can fail in detecting all tissue regions, for example due to the
tissue type, or due to weak staining because their tissue detection algorithms
are not robust enough. In this paper, we introduce two different convolutional
neural network architectures for whole slide image segmentation to accurately
identify the tissue sections. We also compare the algorithms to a published
traditional method. We collected 54 whole slide images with differing stains
and tissue types from three laboratories to validate our algorithms. We show
that while the two methods do not differ significantly they outperform their
traditional counterpart (Jaccard index of 0.937 and 0.929 vs. 0.870, p < 0.01).Comment: Accepted for poster presentation at the IEEE International Symposium
on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) 201
- …