55 research outputs found

    Categorization, Designation, and Regionalization of Emergency Care: Definitions, a Conceptual Framework, and Future Challenges

    Full text link
    This article reflects the proceedings of a breakout session, “Beyond ED Categorization—Matching Networks to Patient Needs,” at the 2010 Academic Emergency Medicine consensus conference, “Beyond Regionalization: Integrated Networks of Emergency Care.” It is based on concepts and areas of priority identified and developed by the authors and participants at the conference. The paper first describes definitions fundamental to understanding the categorization, designation, and regionalization of emergency care and then considers a conceptual framework for this process. It also provides a justification for a categorization system being integrated into a regionalized emergency care system. Finally, it discusses potential challenges and barriers to the adoption of a categorization and designation system for emergency care and the opportunities for researchers to study the many issues associated with the implementation of such a system.ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 2010; 17:1306–1311 © 2010 by the Society for Academic Emergency MedicinePeer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/79324/1/j.1553-2712.2010.00932.x.pd

    James S. Seidel, MD, PhD: a memorial

    No full text

    Frequency of Thrombectomy in Early and Late Postonset Time Windows Among Emergency Medical Services Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke

    No full text
    Background With recent trials demonstrating benefit of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) up to 24 hours from last known well time (LKWT), emergency medical services systems must consider stroke center routing for patients with LKWT ≤24 hours. We sought to determine the frequency of thrombectomy by prehospital‐determined LKWT using retrospective data from a tiered regional stroke care system. Methods During the July 2018 to March 2019 study period, patients with potential large‐vessel occlusion, based on a Los Angeles Motor Scale of 4 or 5, were routed directly to a designated EVT center if within 30 minutes. We determined the frequency of thrombectomy by time intervals from prehospital‐determined LKWT to first medical contact. Results Emergency medical services transported 830 patients with acute ischemic stroke with documented prehospital‐determined LKWT ≤24 hours to EVT centers. The ≤6 hours, >6 to ≤16 hours, and >16 to ≤24 hours epochs accounted for 75%, 20%, and 5% of transports to EVT centers, respectively. Men accounted for 47% of the study population, with a median age of 77 years (interquartile range, 64–86 years) and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale median of 11 (interquartile range, 4–20). Overall, 28.2% (234/830) received EVT. Time window–specific EVT frequencies were: ≤6 hours (29.8% of patients [187/627]); >6 to ≤16 hours (24.1% of patients [39/162]); and >16 to ≤24 hours (19.5% of [8/41]). Conclusion In this regional stroke system with 2‐tiered routing, patients in the >6‐ to 24‐hour postonset window accounted for nearly one fourth of transports to EVT centers and 23% received thrombectomy
    corecore