General Practitioners' opinions on their practice in mental health and their collaboration with mental health professionals

BACKGROUND: Common mental health problems are mainly treated in primary care settings and collaboration with mental health services is needed. Prior to re-organisation of the mental health care offer in a geographical area, a study was organized: 1) to evaluate GPs' opinions on their day-to-day practice with Patients with Mental Health Problems (PMHP) and on relationships with Mental Health Professionals (MHPro); 2) to identify factors associated with perceived need for collaboration with MHPro and with actual collaboration. METHODS: All GPs in the South Yvelines area in France (n = 492) were informed of the implementation of a local mental health program. GPs interested in taking part (n = 180) were invited to complete a satisfaction questionnaire on their practice in the field of Mental Health and to include prospectively all PMHP consultants over an 8-day period (n = 1519). For each PMHP, data was collected on demographic and clinical profile, and on needs (met v. unmet) for collaboration with MHPro. RESULTS: A majority of GPs rated PMHP as requiring more care (83.4%), more time (92.3%), more frequent consultations (64.0%) and as being more difficult to refer (87.7%) than other patients. A minority of GPs had a satisfactory relationship with private psychiatrists (49.5%), public psychiatrists (35%) and social workers (27.8%). 53.9% had a less satisfactory relationship with MHPro than with other physicians. Needs for collaboration with a MHPro were more often felt in caring for PMHP who were young, not in employment, with mental health problems lasting for more than one year, with a history of psychiatric hospitalization, and showing reluctance to talk of psychological problems and to consult a MHPro. Needs for collaboration were more often met among PMHP with past psychiatric consultation or hospitalization and when the patient was not reluctant to consult a MHPro. Where needs were not met, GP would opt for the classic procedure of mental health referral for only 31.3% of their PMHP. CONCLUSION: GPs need targeted collaboration with MHPro to support their management of PMHP, whom they are willing to care for without systematic referral to specialists as the major therapeutic option

The pharmacokinetics of chloroquine in healthy and

The schizogony of malarial parasite is a typical cyclic phenomenon where the different stages of parasite development appear at regular time intervals. Each of the stages is specifically sensitive to different antimalarial drugs. Knowledge of the details of the cycle, drug susceptibility and the pharmacokinetics of drugs, could allow the improvement of drug action by the chronotherapeutic approach: treatment at the time of appearance of the drugsensitive stage with a drug that displays rapid pharmacokinetics. Since murine malarias serve as preferable models for in vivo drug testing, the pharmacokinetics of subcutaneously (sc) administered chloroquine (CQ) were tested in the whole blood of healthy mice and in animals slightly (1.5-3.5 % parasitemia) or heavily infected (21-25 % parasitemia) with Plasmodium chabaudi chabaudi. The half-time of absorption was around 5 min and almost independent of parasitemia. The apparent half-time of drug concentration decay was around 40 min in healthy animals, about 90 min at low parasitemia and about 410 min in heavy infection, indicating that the concentration of CQ is a typical spike, that is prolonged by asymptomatic disease, and considerably more by the active accumulation of CQ in infected cells. The latter is confirmed by the 3-fold higher peak blood [CQ] at the trophozoite stage and < 1.5- fold increase during schizogony. In conjunction with our previous experiments which showed that a single sc injection of 5 mg/kg CQ is sufficient to eliminate the drug susceptible mid-term trophozoite stage, the present results seem to justify to propose the chronotherapeutic approach for the treatment of malaria