63 research outputs found
Evaluation of flu vaccination coverage among healthcare workers during a 3 years’ study period and attitude towards influenza and potential covid-19 vaccination in the context of the pandemic
(1) Background: vaccination of healthcare workers (HCWs) against seasonal influenza is considered the most effective way to protect HCWs, ensure patient’s safety and to maintain essential health care services during influenza epidemics. With the present study we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of incremental bundles of measures implemented during the last three flu campaigns and to assess the attitudes towards influenza vaccination and a potential vaccine against COVID-19 among HCWs, in a large university hospital in Pisa, Italy. (2) Methods: We described measures implemented during 2018/2019, 2019/2020 and 2020/2021 and assessed their impact on flu vaccine coverage (VC) among employees and residents in Pisa university hospital. We considered sex, profession and ward to investigate differences in uptake. In addition, in 2020 a survey was developed and distributed to all employees to evaluate flu and COVID-19 vaccines attitudes. (3) Results: during the 2018/19 and 2019/20 flu campaigns the overall VC rate among HCWs was, respectively, 10.2% and 11.9%. In 2020/21 the overall VC rate jumped to 39.3% (+230.6%). Results from the survey indicated a more positive attitude towards flu vaccine as compared to COVID-19 vaccines among the 10.6% of the staff members who responded to the survey. In addition, 70.97% of HCWs totally agreed that being vaccinated against influenza would be more important than the previous years because of COVID-19 emergency. (4) Conclusions: a significant increase in VC was observed in 2020/21, especially among those sub-groups with consistently lower uptake in previous years. The COVID-19 pandemic positively influenced flu vaccination uptake during the 2020/21 season
Mortalidad evitable en los estados colindantes de la frontera México-Estados Unidos, 1999-2001 y 2009-2011
Case Note: Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v Italy - Greece Intervening) (Judgment) (International Court of Justice, General List No 143, 3 February 2012)
“ELEVATA PREVALENZA DI ALTERAZIONI PLEUROPARENCHIMALI CORRELATE A PREGRESSA ESPOSIZIONE AD AMIANTO NEI LAVORATORI DI UN‘AZIENDA DEL COMPARTO NAVALMECCANICO”
[MANAGEMENT OF LATEX ALLERGY IN THE PISA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL: ANALYSIS OF DATA DERIVING FROM THE REGISTRY FILING BOTH ALLERGIC PATIENTS AND EMPLOYEES]
Determinants of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Italian healthcare workers: a multicenter study
Healthcare workers (HCWs) are at increased risk of being infected with SARS-CoV-2, yet limited information is available on risk factors of infection. We pooled data on occupational surveillance of 10,654 HCW who were tested for SARS-CoV-2 infection in six Italian centers. Information was available on demographics, job title, department of employment, source of exposure, use of personal protective equipment (PPEs), and COVID-19-related symptoms. We fitted multivariable logistic regression models to calculate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals of infection. The prevalence of infection ranged from 3.0 to 22.0%, and was correlated with that of the respective areas. Women were at lower risk of infection compared to men. Fever, cough, dyspnea and malaise were the symptoms most strongly associated with infection, together with anosmia and ageusia. No differences in the risk of infection were detected according to job title, or working in a COVID-19 designated department. Reported contact with a patient inside or outside the workplace was a risk factor. Use of a mask was strongly protective against risk of infection as was use of gloves. The use of a mask by the source of exposure (patient or colleague) had an independent effect in reducing infection risk
DOSAGGIO DELLE IGE SPECIFICHE PER IL LATTICE NELLA SORVEGLIANZA SANITARIA PREVENTIVA E PERIODICA IN UN'AZIENDA OSPEDALIERA TOSCANA
- …