Restitution analysis of alternans and its relationship to arrhythmogenicity in hypokalaemic Langendorff-perfused murine hearts

Alternans and arrhythmogenicity were studied in hypokalaemic (3.0 mM K+) Langendorff-perfused murine hearts paced at high rates. Epicardial and endocardial monophasic action potentials were recorded and durations quantified at 90% repolarization. Alternans and arrhythmia occurred in hypokalaemic, but not normokalaemic (5.2 mM K+) hearts (P < 0.01): this was prevented by treatment with lidocaine (10 μM, P < 0.01). Fourier analysis then confirmed transition from monomorphic to polymorphic waveforms for the first time in the murine heart. Alternans and arrhythmia were associated with increases in the slopes of restitution curves, obtained for the first time in the murine heart, while the anti-arrhythmic effect of lidocaine was associated with decreased slopes. Thus, hypokalaemia significantly increased (P < 0.05) maximal gradients (from 0.55 ± 0.14 to 2.35 ± 0.67 in the epicardium and from 0.67 ± 0.13 to 1.87 ± 0.28 in the endocardium) and critical diastolic intervals (DIs) at which gradients equalled unity (from −2.14 ± 0.52 ms to 50.93 ± 14.45 ms in the epicardium and from 8.14 ± 1.49 ms to 44.64 ± 5 ms in the endocardium). While treatment of normokalaemic hearts with lidocaine had no significant effect (P > 0.05) on either maximal gradients (0.78 ± 0.27 in the epicardium and 0.83 ± 0.45 in the endocardium) or critical DIs (6.06 ± 2.10 ms and 7.04 ± 3.82 ms in the endocardium), treatment of hypokalaemic hearts with lidocaine reduced (P < 0.05) both these parameters (1.05 ± 0.30 in the epicardium and 0.89 ± 0.36 in the endocardium and 30.38 ± 8.88 ms in the epicardium and 31.65 ± 4.78 ms in the endocardium, respectively). We thus demonstrate that alternans contributes a dynamic component to arrhythmic substrate during hypokalaemia, that restitution may furnish an underlying mechanism and that these phenomena are abolished by lidocaine, both recapitulating and clarifying clinical findings

Environmental Constraints on the Mechanics of Crawling and Burrowing Using Hydrostatic Skeletons

Mechanics, kinematics, and energetics of crawling and burrowing by limbless organisms using hydrostatic skeletons depend on the medium and mode in which the organism is moving. Whether the animal is moving over or through a solid has long been considered important enough to distinguish crawling and burrowing as different terms, and in fact the mechanics are very different. Crawlers use mechanisms to increase friction to generate thrust while reducing resistive friction. Burrowers in elastic muds extend their burrows by fracture, whereas sands are fluidized by burrowers much larger than grain sizes and smaller burrowers displace individual grains. Gravitational forces depend on how closely the density of the organism matches that of its fluid surroundings, therefore frictional forces depend on whether the organism is moving through air or water and fluidization on whether sands are saturated or unsaturated