11 research outputs found

    Gender differences in heroin addiction and treatment: results from the VEdeTTE cohort

    No full text
    Background: Gender differences strongly affect heroin addiction, from risk factors to patterns of consumption, access to treatments, and outcomes. Objectives: To investigate gender differences in the VEdeTTE cohort of heroin addicts. Methods: VEdeTTE is a cohort of 10,454 heroin users enrolled between 1998 and 2001 in 115 public drug treatment centres in Italy. Clinical and personal information were collected at intake through a structured interview. Treatments were recorded using a standardized form. Gender differences were explored with regard to characteristics at intake, treatments, and retention in methadone maintenance and therapeutic community. Cox Proportional models were carried out to identify risk factors for treatment abandon. Results: Compared with men, at their first access to treatment women with drug addiction were younger, more frequently married, legally separated, divorced or widow, unemployed though better educated, HIV+; more frequently they lived with their partner and sons. They reported a higher use of sedatives, but a lower use of alcohol; more frequently they had psychiatric comorbidity, including depression, self-injuries, and suicide attempts. Psychotherapy was more frequently prescribed to women, pharmacological treatments to men. Methadone maintenance was less frequently abandoned by women. Drug abuse severity factors predicted abandon of methadone among women. High methadone doses and the combination with psychotherapy improved treatment retention in both genders. Low education level and severity factors among women and young age among men predicted abandon of therapeutic community. Conclusions: Gender differences in the VEdeTTE cohort suggest the need of a gender sensitive approach to improve treatment outcomes among heroin addicts

    Serum uric acid and its relationship with metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular risk profile in patients with hypertension: Insights from the I-DEMAND study

    No full text
    BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The independent role of serum uric acid (SUA) as a marker of cardio-renal risk is debated. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between SUA, metabolic syndrome (MS), and other cardiovascular (CV) risk factors in an Italian population of hypertensive patients with a high prevalence of diabetes. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 2429 patients (mean age 62 ± 11 years) among those enrolled in the I-DEMAND study were stratified on the basis of SUA gender specific quartiles. MS was defined according to the NCEP-ATP III criteria, chronic kidney disease (CKD) as an estimated GFR (CKD-Epi) <60 ml/min/1.73 m(2) or as the presence of microalbuminuria (albumin-to-creatinine ratio ≥2.5 mg/mmol in men and ≥3.5 mg/mmol in women). The prevalence of MS, CKD, and positive history for CV events was 72%, 43%, and 20%, respectively. SUA levels correlated with the presence of MS, its components, signs of renal damage and worse CV risk profile. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that SUA was associated with a positive history of CV events and high Framingham risk score even after adjusting for MS and its components (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.03-1.18; P = 0.0060; OR 1.28, 95% CI 1.15-1.42; P < 0.0001). These associations were stronger in patients without diabetes and with normal renal function. CONCLUSIONS: Mild hyperuricemia is a strong, independent marker of MS and high cardio-renal risk profile in hypertensive patients under specialist care. Intervention trials are needed to investigate whether the reduction of SUA levels favorably impacts outcome in patients at high CV risk
    corecore