What is the Natural Size of Supersymmetric CPCP Violation?

It is well known that if phases and masses in the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM) are allowed to have general values, the resulting neutron EDM ($d_n$) exceeds the experimental upper limit by about $10^3$. We assume that the needed suppression is not due to a fine-tuning of phases or masses, and ask what natural size of $CP$ violation (CPV) results. We show that (1) the phase of one of the superpotential parameters, $\mu$, does not contribute to any CPV in the MSSM and so is not constrained by \dn; (2) the MSSM contribution to $d_n$ is tiny, just coming from the CKM phase; (3) the phases in the MSSM cannot be used to generate a baryon asymmetry at the weak scale, given our assumptions; and (4) in non-minimal SUSY models, an effective phase can enter at one loop giving $d_n \sim 10^{-26}$\ecm, $d_e \sim 10^{-27}$\ecm, and allowing a baryon asymmetry to be generated at the weak scale, without fine-tunings. Our results could be evaded by a SUSY breaking mechanism which produced phases for the SUSY breaking parameters that somehow were naturally of order $10^{-3}$.Comment: 13pp (no figs), REVTEX (LATEX), TRI-PP-93-

Measuring the Supersymmetry Lagrangian

The parameters of the supersymmetry Lagrangian are the place where experiment and theory will meet. We show that measuring them is harder than has been thought, particularly because of large unavoidable dependences on phases. Measurements are only guaranteed if a lepton collider with a polarized beam and sufficient energy to produce the relevant sparticles is available. Current limits on superpartner masses, WIMPs, and the supersymmetric Higgs are not general, and need re-evaluation. We also tentatively define the MRM (Minimum Reasonable Model), whose parameters may be measurable at LEP, FNAL and LHC.Comment: 10 pages, 1 figure; a typographical error corrected in eq. (1) and one reference adde

Supersymmetric b→sγb \rightarrow s \gamma with Large Chargino Contributions

Supersymmetric (SUSY) theories are often thought to give large branching ratios for $b \rightarrow s \gamma$ from charged Higgs loops. We show that in many cases chargino loop contributions can cancel those of the Higgs, and SUSY can give $B(b \rightarrow s \gamma)$ at or below the \SM\ prediction. We show this occurs because the large stop mass splittings usually found in SUSY break a GIM mechanism suppression. These effects are strongly enhanced by large $\tan\beta$, so that $B(b \rightarrow s \gamma)$ is very sensitive to the value of $\tan\beta$, contrary to what has been claimed. We also note that the supergravity relation $B_0 = A_0-1$ is somewhat disfavored over the general case.Comment: TRI-PP-93-66. 12pp (Plain LATEX)+4 fig not incl. PostScript file of figs available (~3MB), contact Corrie Kost [email protected]. Request hardcopy or FAX of figures through [email protected]

Heavy quark polarizations of e+e−→qqˉhe^+e^-\to q \bar q h in the general two Higgs doublet model

The polarizations of the heavy quark ($q=t$ or $b$) in the process $e^+e^- \to q \bar q h$ have been calculated in the general two Higgs doublet model. The CP violating normal polarization of the top quark can reach 8%, and $2 \sim 3$ for the bottom quark, while it is zero in the standard model. The longitudinal and transverse polarizations of the bottom quark can be significantly different from those in SM and consequently could aslo be used as the probe of the new physics.Comment: 12 pages, discussion on statistic significance added, version to appear in PR

What can the L3 γγll\gamma\gamma ll events be?

We consider the 4 $\gamma\gamma ll$ ($l=\mu,\ e$) events reported by the L3 collaboration, and go through the logical possibilities which could explain the events. If they are not coincidental bremsstrahlung events, we find that the physics which they could point to is extremely limited. One possibility would be to have a new 60 GeV scalar (or pseudoscalar) particle $X^0$ with an off-diagonal coupling to a $Z$ and $Z'$ which is non-perturbative ($\alpha > 1$), where the $Z'$ couplings to $\nu\bar\nu$ are suppressed. One could also construct a model involving $X^0$, and a second scalar $X'^0$ with a large $X'll$ coupling. We do not promote either of these models, but hope they would prove to be useful guidelines, should the L3 events turn out to be new physics.Comment: 7 pp (3 fig avail. on request), LATEX, TRI-PP-92-12

More on Electric Dipole Moment Constraints on Phases in the Constrained MSSM

We reconsider constraints on \cp-violating phases in the Constrained Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model. We include the recent calculations of Ibrahim and Nath on the chromoelectric and purely gluonic contributions to the quark electric dipole moment and combine cosmological limits on gaugino masses with experimental bounds on the neutron (and electron) electric dipole moments. The constraint on the phase of the Higgs mixing mass $\mu$, |\thm|, is dependent on the value of the trilinear mass parameter, $A$, in the model and on $\tan \beta$. For values of |A| < 300 \gev at the GUT scale, we find |\thm|/\pi \la 0.05, while for |A| < 1500 \gev, |\thm|/\pi \la 0.3. Thus, we find that in principle, large CP violating phases are compatible with the bounds on the electric dipole moments of the neutron and electron, as well as remaining compatible with the cosmological upper bound on the relic density of neutralinos. The other \cp-violating phase \tha is essentially unconstrained.Comment: 11 pages in LaTeX + 4 postscript figures, uses epsf.sty. Added two references, clarified figures. Accepted to Physics Letter