9 research outputs found

    Mimicking natural evolution in metallo-β-lactamases through second-shell ligand mutations

    No full text
    Metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs) represent the latest generation of β-lactamases. The structural diversity and broad substrate profile of MBLs allow them to confer resistance to most β-lactam antibiotics. To explore the evolutionary potential of these enzymes, we have subjected the Bacillus cereus MBL (BcII) to a directed evolution scheme, which resulted in an increased hydrolytic efficiency toward cephalexin. A systematic study of the hydrolytic profile, substrate binding, and active-site features of the evolved lactamase reveal that directed evolution has shaped the active site by means of remote mutations to better hydrolyze cephalosporins with small, uncharged C-3 substituents. One of these mutations is found in related enzymes from pathogenic bacteria and is responsible for the increase in that enzyme's hydrolytic profile. The mutations lowered the activation energy of the rate-limiting step rather than improved the affinity of the enzyme toward these substrates. The following conclusions can be made: (i) MBLs are able to expand their substrate spectrum without sacrificing their inherent hydrolytic capabilities; (ii) directed evolution is able to mimic mutations that occur in nature; (iii) the metal-ligand strength is tuned by second-shell mutations, thereby influencing the catalytic efficiency; and (iv) changes in the position of the second Zn(II) ion in MBLs affect the substrate positioning in the active site. Overall, these results show that the evolution of enzymatic catalysis can take place by remote mutations controlling reactivity

    Invited Review: Cryo-scanning electron microscopy (CSEM) in the advancement of functional plant biology. Morphological and anatomical applications

    No full text

    Body mass index and complications following major gastrointestinal surgery: a prospective, international cohort study and meta-analysis.

    No full text
    AIM: Previous studies reported conflicting evidence on the effects of obesity on outcomes after gastrointestinal surgery. The aims of this study were to explore the relationship of obesity with major postoperative complications in an international cohort and to present a meta-analysis of all available prospective data. METHODS: This prospective, multicentre study included adults undergoing both elective and emergency gastrointestinal resection, reversal of stoma or formation of stoma. The primary end-point was 30-day major complications (Clavien-Dindo Grades III-V). A systematic search was undertaken for studies assessing the relationship between obesity and major complications after gastrointestinal surgery. Individual patient meta-analysis was used to analyse pooled results. RESULTS: This study included 2519 patients across 127 centres, of whom 560 (22.2%) were obese. Unadjusted major complication rates were lower in obese vs normal weight patients (13.0% vs 16.2%, respectively), but this did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.863) on multivariate analysis for patients having surgery for either malignant or benign conditions. Individual patient meta-analysis demonstrated that obese patients undergoing surgery for malignancy were at increased risk of major complications (OR 2.10, 95% CI 1.49-2.96, P < 0.001), whereas obese patients undergoing surgery for benign indications were at decreased risk (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.46-0.75, P < 0.001) compared to normal weight patients. CONCLUSIONS: In our international data, obesity was not found to be associated with major complications following gastrointestinal surgery. Meta-analysis of available prospective data made a novel finding of obesity being associated with different outcomes depending on whether patients were undergoing surgery for benign or malignant disease
    corecore