2 research outputs found

    Condiciones de operaci贸n de un biorreactor para la fermentaci贸n en caf茅

    Get PDF
    Las fermentaciones con temperatura controlada se proponen como alternativa de procesamiento para obtener beneficios en la calidad del caf茅. Las caracter铆sticas f铆sicas cambiantes en la masa de caf茅, durante la fermentaci贸n, se convierten en un desaf铆o para que el sistema de agitaci贸n logre condiciones homog茅neas de temperatura. Con el objetivo de determinar las condiciones de operaci贸n de un biorreactor para fermentaciones en caf茅, se realiz贸 un proceso de puesta a punto, en el que se realizaron fermentaciones con variaci贸n en la velocidad de rotaci贸n, tiempo de agitaci贸n y periodo entre agitaciones. Posteriormente se determin贸 el comportamiento de las fermentaciones en un rango de temperatura entre 10 y 30 潞C, con intervalos de 5 潞C. Como testigo de cada proceso se realiz贸 una fermentaci贸n espont谩nea. Se determinaron los tiempos de degradaci贸n de muc铆lago mayor a 95 % y de equilibrio de temperatura entre la masa y la chaqueta del equipo. Se observaron diferencias en el tiempo de fermentaci贸n y los valores finales de pH y temperatura de la masa, respecto al testigo y a la temperatura de control. Los procesos controlados tomaron entre 2 y 13 horas m谩s de fermentaci贸n que el testigo correspondiente. Mediante un impulsor de paletas planas, se identific贸 el mejor punto de operaci贸n cuando el proceso se realiz贸 a 3 r鈥-1, por 2 min, cada 6 horas. Para lograr una temperatura de fermentaci贸n en la masa de caf茅, de acuerdo con sus caracter铆sticas, se requiere una agitaci贸n a baja velocidad para no generar remoci贸n mec谩nica de muc铆lago.Fermentation at a controlled temperature is proposed as a processing alternative to obtain benefits in terms of coffee quality. The changing physical characteristics in the coffee mass during fermentation become a challenge for the stirring system to achieve homogeneous temperature conditions. A fine-tuning process was carried out to determine the operating conditions of a bioreactor for fermentation in coffee with variations in rotation speed, stirring time, and the period between stirrings. Subsequently, the behavior of the fermentations was determined in a temperature range between 10 and 30 掳C, at intervals of 5 掳C. As a comparison for each process, spontaneous fermentation was carried out. The time to reach mucilage degradation greater than 95 % and the time to reach equilibrium between the temperatures of the coffee mass and the equipment鈥檚 water jacket were determined. The final pH was also registered. Descriptive differences observed between the processes with controlled temperature, the spontaneous fermentation in the time to reach mucilage degradation, and the final pH and temperature values. The controlled processes required between 2 and 13 hours longer fermentations than the corresponding spontaneous process. Through a flat vane impeller, the best operating point was identified when the process was performed at 3 r鈥in-1 for 2 min every 6 hours. Low-speed agitation is required to reduce mechanical removal of mucilage

    Characterization of Fermentations with Controlled Temperature with Three Varieties of Coffee (<i>Coffea arabica</i> L.)

    No full text
    Temperature control is the starting point for the development of controlled fermentation and improving coffee quality. The characteristics of coffee varieties can influence fermentation behavior. To evaluate the effect of the coffee variety on the behavior of controlled fermentation and on coffee quality, a completely randomized design was used with three varieties (Castillo, Cenicaf茅1 and Tabi) and two control temperatures (15 and 30 掳C). Spontaneous fermentation was the control for each controlled process. The fermentation time, pH, glucose and lactic acid contents, as well as, the count of mesophiles, yeasts, lactic acid bacteria (LAB) and acetic acid bacteria (AAB), were assessed. The sensory quality of the coffee was classified as very good and excellent based on the variety, with averages above 82 Specialty Coffee Association (SCA) points. The highest values were for the Cenicaf茅1 variety. Fermentation behaviors were similar among varieties but not based on the given condition. Compared with spontaneous fermentation, the treatment at 15 掳C prolonged the degradation of mucilage in more than 24 h; additionally, there were differences in the final pH values, less than 3.5 and close to 4.0, respectively. Quality was not significantly different between the controlled fermentation and the spontaneous fermentation (Wilcoxon test p > 0.05) or between fermentation temperatures (Kruskal鈥揥allis test p > 0.05)
    corecore