18 research outputs found

    Iinfluence ideological Β«Moscow – third RomeΒ» on the formation of autocracy in Russia

    Get PDF
    ΠŸΡ€ΠΎΠ°Π½Π°Π»Ρ–Π·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΎ Π²ΠΏΠ»ΠΈΠ² Ρ–Π΄Π΅ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³Π΅ΠΌΠΈ «Москва – Π’Ρ€Π΅Ρ‚Ρ–ΠΉ Π ΠΈΠΌΒ» Π½Π° Π²Π·Π°Ρ”ΠΌΠΈΠ½ΠΈ ΠΌΡ–ΠΆ Ρ†Π΅Ρ€ΠΊΠ²ΠΎΡŽ, Π΄Π΅Ρ€ΠΆΠ°Π²ΠΎΡŽ Ρ‚Π° ΡΡƒΡΠΏΡ–Π»ΡŒΡΡ‚Π²ΠΎΠΌ Ρƒ контСксті самодСрТавної ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»Ρ– управління Π² Росії.На підставі Π°Π½Π°Π»Ρ–Π·Ρƒ Ρ–Π΄Π΅ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³Π΅ΠΌΠΈ встановлСно, Ρ‰ΠΎ ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ»ΠΈΠ²Ρ–ΡΡ‚ΡŒ втілСння Царства Π‘ΠΎΠΆΠΎΠ³ΠΎ пов’язана Π· ΠΏΡ€Π°Π²ΠΎΡΠ»Π°Π²Π½ΠΎΡŽ Ρ†Π΅Ρ€ΠΊΠ²ΠΎΡŽ, яка ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅ Ρ€Π΅Π°Π»Ρ–Π·ΡƒΠ²Π°Ρ‚ΠΈ свою ΠΌΡ–ΡΡ–ΡŽ лишС Ρƒ Ρ…Ρ€ΠΈΡΡ‚ΠΈΡΠ½ΡΡŒΠΊΡ–ΠΉ Π΄Π΅Ρ€ΠΆΠ°Π²Ρ– Ρ‡Π΅Ρ€Π΅Π· союз Π· Ρ†Π°Ρ€ΡΡŒΠΊΠΎΡŽ владою. Π¦Π°Ρ€ постає захисником чистоти Π²Ρ–Ρ€ΠΈ, ΠΏΡ€Π°Π² православної Ρ†Π΅Ρ€ΠΊΠ²ΠΈ Ρ‚Π° Ρ—Ρ— Π²Ρ–Ρ€Π½ΠΈΡ…. РСалізація Ρ†Ρ–Ρ”Ρ— Ρ–Π΄Π΅ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³Π΅ΠΌΠΈ Π΄ΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠ»Π° ΠΏΡ–Π΄Π²ΠΈΡ‰ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈ Π°Π²Ρ‚ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Ρ‚ Π²Π»Π°Π΄ΠΈ правитСля Ρ‚Π° Π²Ρ–Π΄ΠΊΡ€ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈ моТливості для Π·ΠΎΠ²Π½Ρ–ΡˆΠ½ΡŒΠΎΡ— Скспансії Росії.ΠšΠ»ΡŽΡ‡ΠΎΠ²Ρ– слова: Π²Π»Π°Π΄Π°, мСсіанізм, православ’я, Ρ†Π΅Ρ€ΠΊΠ²Π°, Скспансія.Π“Π°Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π΅Π½ΠΊΠΎ М. Π’. ВлияниС ΠΈΠ΄Π΅ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³Π΅ΠΌΡ‹ «Москва – Ρ‚Ρ€Π΅Ρ‚ΠΈΠΉ Π ΠΈΠΌΒ» Π½Π° становлСниС самодСрТавия Π² России/ Житомирский государствСнный унивСрситСт ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΈ Ивана Π€Ρ€Π°Π½ΠΊΠ°, Π£ΠΊΡ€Π°ΠΈΠ½Π°, Π–ΠΈΡ‚ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡ€ΠŸΡ€ΠΎΠ°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΎ влияниС ΠΈΠ΄Π΅ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³Π΅ΠΌΡ‹ «Москва – Π’Ρ€Π΅Ρ‚ΠΈΠΉ Π ΠΈΠΌΒ» Π½Π° Π²Π·Π°ΠΈΠΌΠΎΠΎΡ‚Π½ΠΎΡˆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Ρƒ Ρ†Π΅Ρ€ΠΊΠΎΠ²ΡŒΡŽ, государством ΠΈ общСством Π² контСкстС самодСрТавной ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈ управлСния Π² России.На основании Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° ΠΈΠ΄Π΅ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³Π΅ΠΌΡ‹ установлСно, Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ воплощСния Царства Π‘ΠΎΠΆΡŒΠ΅Π³ΠΎ связана с православной Ρ†Π΅Ρ€ΠΊΠΎΠ²ΡŒΡŽ, которая ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅Ρ‚ Ρ€Π΅Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Ρ‚ΡŒ свою миссию Ρ‚ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠΊΠΎ Π² христианском государствС Ρ‡Π΅Ρ€Π΅Π· союз с царской Π²Π»Π°ΡΡ‚ΡŒΡŽ. Π¦Π°Ρ€ΡŒ являСтся Π·Π°Ρ‰ΠΈΡ‚Π½ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠΌ чистоты Π²Π΅Ρ€Ρ‹, ΠΏΡ€Π°Π² православной Ρ†Π΅Ρ€ΠΊΠ²ΠΈ ΠΈ Π΅Π΅ Π²Π΅Ρ€ΡƒΡŽΡ‰ΠΈΡ…. РСализация этой ΠΈΠ΄Π΅ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³Π΅ΠΌΡ‹ ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠ»Π° ΠΏΠΎΠ²Ρ‹ΡΠΈΡ‚ΡŒ Π°Π²Ρ‚ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Ρ‚ власти правитСля ΠΈ ΠΎΡ‚ΠΊΡ€Ρ‹Ρ‚ΡŒ возмоТности для внСшнСй экспансии России.ΠšΠ»ΡŽΡ‡Π΅Π²Ρ‹Π΅ слова: Π²Π»Π°ΡΡ‚ΡŒ, мСссианизм, православиС, Ρ†Π΅Ρ€ΠΊΠΎΠ², экспансия.Galichenko M. V. Iinfluence ideological Β«Moscow – third RomeΒ» on the formation of autocracy in Russia/ Ivan Franko Zhytomyr State University, Ukraine, ZhytomyrThe influence of the ideology of Β«Moscow – Third RomeΒ» on the relationship between church, state and society in the context of an autocratic model of governance in Russia.On the basis of ideological found that the feasibility of the Kingdom of God is linked with the Orthodox Church, which can realize its mission only Christian country through an alliance with the royal power. King appears defender purity of faith, the rights of the Orthodox Church and its faithful. The implementation of this ideology has improved the credibility and authority of the ruler to open opportunities for foreign expansion in Russia.Key words; power, messianism, orthodoxy, church, expansion

    PRODUCTIVITY OF WINTER WHEAT DEPENDING ON PREDECESSORS

    Get PDF
    Winter wheat is the most important food crop in Russia, having significant value in grain production. It uses bioclimatic potential of the regions better and gives stable grain harvests. The basic purpose of the farmers is to get better harvests of winter wheat with high technological properties. The complex of agricultural methods for winter wheat is determined by the predecessor. It influences on soil fertility and on moisture reserves in a root zone. Such scientists as N.N. Borodin (1976), I.G. Kalinenko (1979), V.A. Alabushev (1987), I.I. Galichenko (2011) and others recon that β€˜black’ fallow ground gives the highest harvests of winter wheat, as it largely supplies plants with water and nutrients, improves phytosanitary conditions, reduces soil weediness. The tasks of primary importance are to develop and improve optimal technological methods of winter wheat growing with the best predecessors. The problem is to find the best correlation between β€˜black’ fallow and cropped fallow that will guarantee to get high productivity of winter wheat. It is established that the best predecessor of winter wheat is weedfree fallow. The productivity of the crop after weedfree fallow was higher on 1,27 t/ha compared with non-fallow predecessors

    Mikhail Bulgakov and his works

    No full text
    The scholarly purpose of this thesis is to illustrate the position occupied by Mikhail Afqnasyevich Bulgakov (1891-1940) in Soviet satire particularly and in Russian literature as a whole, since the dilemma in which the author under analysis found himself, was shared by Soviet authors of diverse backgrounds and literary ideas. Early princedom Russia, the Kievan State and the entire pre-Petrine epoch with its archaic structure, enrooted convervatism and primitivism did not regard literature, grammar and education as valuable assets to the Russian citizen. Of greater importance was defence against invading hordes of nomads, the search for food for daily life and the observance of ancient orders, social customs, superstitions and firm belief in the old faith. It was Peter the Great's responsibility by means of enormous efforts and the introduction of vigorous, often drastic laws and methods, to smash through the century-old crust of ancient "ice" covering the Russian land, the Russian soul and mentality. When he began to trim the boyar’s beards, some preferred suicide to humiliation, and others death beneath the axe of the state executioner. It seems that similarly Russian literature has always led and leads a path of suffering in a difficult defense of its literary principles against oppressive odds and very likely will continue to do so in the future. Such a beginning, this virus in the body of Russian literature - the pushing of various impeding stakes in between the spokes of creativity, never was cured by the application of any effective antidotes. Thus was the fate of Russian literature decreed, so that within it may always be juxtaposed the Pushkins with the Dantes, the Lermontovs with Martynovs, Bulgakovs and Tarsis’ with the Khrushchevs, Brezhnevs and their party successors . In the works of each of Russia's literary giants -prose writers and poets alike, each paragraph, line and word fought with a Herculeon will and might its way towards life in the hearts and minds of the people. For this reason tyrants, regardless of bloodlines, fear the growth, significance and active role of literature. For this reason Russian literature, developing and refining itself always remained very caustic in tone, very heavy in theme and had many enemies everywhere - among the strong of the world, in the darkest kingdoms of egoists, bureaucrats, secret services and other organs of suspicion, censorship and enslavement. Were not all the persons sincerely connected with literature condemned as rioters, rebel-rousers and revolutionaries? And how many special rules governed and still regulate the printing presses? Where else but in Russia did the shameful employment of "zits-editors" exist, whose duty it was to sit out jail terms for their employers - editors and publishers of newspapers and journals - who were sentenced by rule of other men, not law? Finally, what mountains of literary works were censored and what number of their authors defamed? It may be deduced, that over twenty-five percent of all literary workers in Russian literature perished either physically or morally and died one of these deaths. Such "attention" paid to literature by its oppressors could not help but leave a trace on its history. It is unlikely that our evaluation of Russian literature as one baptized in storm and fire is incorrect. These very elements continue to temper it today. Why else would the characteristic genres like "laughter through tears", "notes from penal and mental institutions" (imaginary and factual) and "dreams” prevail in it? What indeed did the Russian literary figure characteristically represent? He was the object of suppression, criticism, censorship, and other extreme measures. What had the writer to be on alert for? Dangerous intrigue in the case of Pushkin, ill-fame for Bulgakov and death for Pasternak. In Soviet times, all of these "pleasures" awaited each writer and poet if he could not reconcile himself with and "thank" from the bottom of his heart his hateful overlords, the rulers of the bodies and souls of the Russian people. In completing a major thesis on M.Bulgakov, it was necessary first of all to keep in mind a great Russian literature, whose image may be likened to a Sorrowful Beauty, who presents before the peoples of the world her magnificent exterior and mature personality, while mourning for the people of her own land. I wish to call her by the ancient yet appropriate apellation - "a mourner of the Russian soul". In contrast to French literature - a coquettish being, and German literature - a home economist, Russian literature despite the presence of Krylov, Chekhov, Gorbunov and later Zoschenko - always bore the stamp of "laughter through tears". Mikhail Bulgakov in the history of Russian literature was at one and the same time a part of its heritage and an educational, scandalous embarrassment for the Soviet government. But for Russia itself, Mikhail Bulgakov was one of those rare people who give impetus and vitality to a national literature that will live forever.Arts, Faculty ofCentral, Eastern, and Northern European Studies, Department ofGraduat

    The source material estimation of early-maturing group soybeans by adaptability parameters

    No full text
    The article presents the results of 2018β€”2020 study of 22 early-maturing group soybeans samples of the collection nursery; those samples are of various ecological-geographical origin according to adaptability parameters, plasticity and stability in the conditions of the south of the Amur region, the analysis of yield variability was carried out. The research was carried out on the experimental field of the laboratory of selection and genetics of soybeans FSBSI FSC All-Russian Scientific and Recearch Center of soybean, Sadovoye village, Tambov region. The average varietal soybean seeds yield in the years of research amounted to 2.37 t/ha. Based on the results of agro-ecological assessment of 22 soybean samples, adaptive, plastic and stable samples have been identified, which have an insignificant variation indicator in yield: Heihe 25 (V=3.23%; Ка=1.14; bi=1.00; Si2=0.03), Hei 06–1625 (V=4.69%; Ка=1.06; bi=1.29; Si2=0.01), Hei 05–1031 (V=3.74%; Ка=1.03; bi=1.60; Si2=0.01) and McCall (V=2.34%; Ка=1.06; bi=1.03; Si2=0.01). These genotypes are of practical interest as initial parent forms in selection for adaptability in conditions of the Amur region

    Reflection Ideological Β«Moscow – the Third RomeΒ» in Russian Religious and Philosophical Thought. – Manuscript.

    No full text
    ДисСртація Π½Π° здобуття Π½Π°ΡƒΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ступСня ΠΊΠ°Π½Π΄ΠΈΠ΄Π°Ρ‚Π° Ρ„Ρ–Π»ΠΎΡΠΎΡ„ΡΡŒΠΊΠΈΡ… Π½Π°ΡƒΠΊ Π·Π° ΡΠΏΠ΅Ρ†Ρ–Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ–ΡΡ‚ΡŽ 09.00.11 – рСлігієзнавство. – Π–ΠΈΡ‚ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡ€ΡΡŒΠΊΠΈΠΉ Π΄Π΅Ρ€ΠΆΠ°Π²Π½ΠΈΠΉ унівСрситСт Ρ–ΠΌΠ΅Π½Ρ– Π†Π²Π°Π½Π° Π€Ρ€Π°Π½ΠΊΠ° ΠœΡ–Π½Ρ–ΡΡ‚Π΅Ρ€ΡΡ‚Π²Π° освіти Ρ– Π½Π°ΡƒΠΊΠΈ Π£ΠΊΡ€Π°Ρ—Π½ΠΈ, Π–ΠΈΡ‚ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡ€, 2016. Π£ дисСртації здійснСно Ρ„Ρ–Π»ΠΎΡΠΎΡ„ΡΡŒΠΊΠΎ-Ρ€Π΅Π»Ρ–Π³Ρ–Ρ”Π·Π½Π°Π²Ρ‡ΠΈΠΉ Π°Π½Π°Π»Ρ–Π· Ρ–Π΄Π΅ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³Π΅ΠΌΠΈ «Москва – Π’Ρ€Π΅Ρ‚Ρ–ΠΉ Π ΠΈΠΌΒ», виявлСно Ρ—Ρ— Π±ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΡΡŒΠΊΡƒ Ρ‚Π° Ρ–Π΄Π΅ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³Ρ–Ρ‡Π½Ρƒ ΡΡƒΡ‚Π½Ρ–ΡΡ‚ΡŒ, Π²ΠΈΠ·Π½Π°Ρ‡Π΅Π½ΠΎ особливості рСфлСксії Π½Π° Ρ€Ρ–Π·Π½ΠΈΡ… Π΅Ρ‚Π°ΠΏΠ°Ρ… Ρ€ΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΈΡ‚ΠΊΡƒ Ρ€ΠΎΡΡ–ΠΉΡΡŒΠΊΠΎΡ— Ρ€Π΅Π»Ρ–Π³Ρ–ΠΉΠ½ΠΎ-Ρ„Ρ–Π»ΠΎΡΠΎΡ„ΡΡŒΠΊΠΎΡ— Π΄ΡƒΠΌΠΊΠΈ, Π° Ρ‚Π°ΠΊΠΎΠΆ Ρ—Ρ— втілСння Ρƒ сучасному ΠΊΠΎΠ½Ρ†Π΅ΠΏΡ‚Ρ– «Русский ΠΌΠΈΡ€Β» Π ΠΎΡΡ–ΠΉΡΡŒΠΊΠΎΡ— православної Ρ†Π΅Ρ€ΠΊΠ²ΠΈ. Π”ΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΎ, Ρ‰ΠΎ Ρ–Π΄Π΅ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³Π΅ΠΌΠ° «Москва – Π’Ρ€Π΅Ρ‚Ρ–ΠΉ Π ΠΈΠΌΒ» Ρƒ сучасній Росії – загальновТивана, ΡƒΠ½Ρ–Π²Π΅Ρ€ΡΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½Π° Ρ–Π΄Π΅ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³Π΅ΠΌΠ°-історизм Π·Ρ– Π·ΠΌΡ–ΡˆΠ°Π½ΠΈΠΌ аксіологічним модусом. Π’ΠΎΠ½Π° постає синтСзом Π±ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΡΡŒΠΊΠΈΡ… Ρ–Π΄Π΅ΠΉ Ρ…Ρ€ΠΈΡΡ‚ΠΈΡΠ½ΡΡŒΠΊΠΎΡ— Ссхатології Ρ‚Π° Ρ–ΡƒΠ΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡŒΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ мСсіанізму. На Ρ€Ρ–Π·Π½ΠΈΡ… Π΅Ρ‚Π°ΠΏΠ°Ρ… Ρ—Ρ— функціонування ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π΅Π²Π°ΠΆΠ°Ρ” Π°Π±ΠΎ мСсіанство, Π°Π±ΠΎ ΠΌΡ–ΡΡ–ΠΉΠ½Ρ–ΡΡ‚ΡŒ. Показано Π²ΠΏΠ»ΠΈΠ² Ρ–Π΄Π΅ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³Π΅ΠΌΠΈ «Москва – Π’Ρ€Π΅Ρ‚Ρ–ΠΉ Π ΠΈΠΌΒ» Π½Π° Π²Π·Π°Ρ”ΠΌΠΈΠ½ΠΈ ΠΌΡ–ΠΆ Ρ†Π΅Ρ€ΠΊΠ²ΠΎΡŽ, Π΄Π΅Ρ€ΠΆΠ°Π²ΠΎΡŽ Ρ‚Π° ΡΡƒΡΠΏΡ–Π»ΡŒΡΡ‚Π²ΠΎΠΌ Ρƒ контСксті самодСрТавної ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»Ρ– управління. Π”ΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΎ взаємозв’язок Ρ–Π΄Π΅ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³Π΅ΠΌΠΈ «Москва – Π’Ρ€Π΅Ρ‚Ρ–ΠΉ Π ΠΈΠΌΒ» Ρ‚Π° ΠΊΠΎΠ½Ρ†Π΅ΠΏΡ‚Ρƒ «Русский ΠΌΠΈΡ€Β» як нСвід’ємної складової Ρ–Π΄Π΅ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³Ρ–Ρ— сучасної Росії; окрСслСно відмінності ΠΌΡ–ΠΆ нСоєвразійством Ρ– ΠΊΠΎΠ½Ρ†Π΅ΠΏΡ‚ΠΎΠΌ «Русский ΠΌΠΈΡ€Β» Π ΠΎΡΡ–ΠΉΡΡŒΠΊΠΎΡ— православної Ρ†Π΅Ρ€ΠΊΠ²ΠΈ. ДиссСртация Π½Π° соисканиС ΡƒΡ‡Π΅Π½ΠΎΠΉ стСпСни ΠΊΠ°Π½Π΄ΠΈΠ΄Π°Ρ‚Π° философских Π½Π°ΡƒΠΊ ΠΏΠΎ ΡΠΏΠ΅Ρ†ΠΈΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΠΈ 09.00.11 – Ρ€Π΅Π»ΠΈΠ³ΠΈΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅. – Житомирский государствСнный унивСрситСт ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΈ Ивана Π€Ρ€Π°Π½ΠΊΠΎ ΠœΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΡ‚Π΅Ρ€ΡΡ‚Π²Π° образования ΠΈ Π½Π°ΡƒΠΊΠΈ Π£ΠΊΡ€Π°ΠΈΠ½Ρ‹. – Π–ΠΈΡ‚ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡ€, 2016. ДиссСртация являСтся комплСксным Ρ€Π΅Π»ΠΈΠ³ΠΈΠΎΠ·Π½ΠΎ-философским Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠΌ ΠΈΠ΄Π΅ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³Π΅ΠΌΡ‹ «Москва – Π’Ρ€Π΅Ρ‚ΠΈΠΉ Π ΠΈΠΌΒ», осущСствлённым ΠΏΡƒΡ‚Π΅ΠΌ выявлСния Π΅Π΅ богословской ΠΈ идСологичСской сущности, опрСдСлСния особСнностСй Π΅Π΅ рСфлСксии Π½Π° Ρ€Π°Π·Π½Ρ‹Ρ… этапах развития российской Ρ€Π΅Π»ΠΈΠ³ΠΈΠΎΠ·Π½ΠΎ-философской мысли, Π° Ρ‚Π°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ Π΅Π΅ воплощСния Π² соврСмСнном ΠΊΠΎΠ½Ρ†Π΅ΠΏΡ‚Π΅ «Русский ΠΌΠΈΡ€Β» Русской православной Ρ†Π΅Ρ€ΠΊΠ²ΠΈ. Анализ Π½Π°ΡƒΡ‡Π½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΈ богословских исслСдований ΠΈΠ΄Π΅ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³Π΅ΠΌΡ‹ «Москва – Π’Ρ€Π΅Ρ‚ΠΈΠΉ Π ΠΈΠΌΒ» ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠ» Π²Ρ‹Π΄Π΅Π»ΠΈΡ‚ΡŒ Π΄Π²Π° основных ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Ρ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΡΠΊΠΈΡ… ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ…ΠΎΠ΄Π°, ΠΊΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΡ€Ρ‹Π΅ ΡΠΎΡΡƒΡ‰Π΅ΡΡ‚Π²ΡƒΡŽΡ‚ Π½Π° Ρ€Π°Π·Π½Ρ‹Ρ… этапах развития российской историко-философской мысли: философско-богословский ΠΈ историко-филологичСский. Π’ Ρ€Π°ΠΌΠΊΠ°Ρ… ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ…ΠΎΠ΄Π° осмысливаСтся Ρ€Π΅Π»ΠΈΠ³ΠΈΠΎΠ·Π½ΠΎΠ΅ содСрТаниС ΠΈΠ΄Π΅ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³Π΅ΠΌΡ‹ Π² контСкстС христианской эсхатологии ΠΈ истории православной Ρ†Π΅Ρ€ΠΊΠ²ΠΈ, Π° Π² Ρ€Π°ΠΌΠΊΠ°Ρ… Π²Ρ‚ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ – изучаСтся ΠΈΠ΄Π΅ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³Π΅ΠΌΠ° «Москва – Π’Ρ€Π΅Ρ‚ΠΈΠΉ Π ΠΈΠΌΒ» ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ Ρ„Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΎΡ€ формирования Московского Ρ†Π΅Π½Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ государства, Π° Ρ‚Π°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ источник Π»ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ΡƒΡ€Π½ΠΎ-публицистичСских ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠΈΠ·Π²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ Π₯VΠ† – Π₯VΠ†Π† Π²Π². Π’ Ρ€Π°Π±ΠΎΡ‚Π΅ Π΄ΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π½ΠΎ, Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎ ΠΈΠ΄Π΅ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³Π΅ΠΌΠ° «Москва – Π’Ρ€Π΅Ρ‚ΠΈΠΉ Π ΠΈΠΌΒ» Π² соврСмСнной России – общСупотрСбляСмая, ΡƒΠ½ΠΈΠ²Π΅Ρ€ΡΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½Π°Ρ ΠΈΠ΄Π΅ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³Π΅ΠΌΠ°-историзм со ΡΠΌΠ΅ΡˆΠ°Π½Π½Ρ‹ΠΌ аксиологичСским ΠΌΠΎΠ΄ΡƒΠ»Π΅ΠΌ. Она выступаСт особым ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΡƒΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π½Π΅Π²Ρ‹ΠΌ ΠΊΠΎΠ½Ρ†Π΅ΠΏΡ‚ΠΎΠΌ, структура ΠΊΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠ±ΡŠΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Ρ‚ ΠΊΠΎΠ»Π»Π΅ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠ΅, стСрСотипичСскоС, ΠΌΠΈΡ„ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ΅ прСдставлСниС россиян ΠΎ власти, Π½Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ, государствС, политичСских ΠΈ идСологичСских институтах. УстановлСно, Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎ ΠΈΠ΄Π΅ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³Π΅ΠΌΠ° «Москва – Π’Ρ€Π΅Ρ‚ΠΈΠΉ Π ΠΈΠΌΒ» ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π΅Ρ‚ ваТнСйшСС Π·Π½Π°Ρ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ для российской историософии. Она являСтся синтСзом богословских ΠΈΠ΄Π΅ΠΉ христианской эсхатологии ΠΈ иудСйского мСссианства. На основС библСйской истории данная ΠΈΠ΄Π΅ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³Π΅ΠΌΠ° создаСт собствСнный Π½Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹ΠΉ Π²Π°Ρ€ΠΈΠ°Π½Ρ‚ историчСского развития, ΠΊΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΡ€Ρ‹ΠΉ ΠΏΡ€Π΅Ρ‚Π΅Π½Π΄ΡƒΠ΅Ρ‚ Π½Π° ΡƒΠ½ΠΈΠ²Π΅Ρ€ΡΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ ΠΈ Π²Π½Π΅Π²Ρ€Π΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ. Π‘Π²ΡΡ‚ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ русской Π·Π΅ΠΌΠ»ΠΈ ΠΈ стрСмлСниС россиян Π½Π°ΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Ρ‚ΡŒ ΠΈΡΡ‚ΠΈΠ½Π½ΡƒΡŽ Π²Π΅Ρ€Ρƒ – православиС, ΠΊΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΠ΅ Ρ‚Ρ€Π΅Π±ΡƒΠ΅Ρ‚ Π±Π΅Π·ΡƒΠΊΠΎΡ€ΠΈΠ·Π½Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ соотвСтствия обрядам, способствуСт ΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ½Ρ‡Π°Ρ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΌΡƒ ΡƒΡ‚Π²Π΅Ρ€ΠΆΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡŽ богоизбранности. ΠŸΡ€ΠΎΠ°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΎ влияниС ΠΈΠ΄Π΅ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³Π΅ΠΌΡ‹ «Москва – Π’Ρ€Π΅Ρ‚ΠΈΠΉ Π ΠΈΠΌΒ» Π½Π° Π²Π·Π°ΠΈΠΌΠΎΠΎΡ‚Π½ΠΎΡˆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Ρƒ Ρ†Π΅Ρ€ΠΊΠΎΠ²ΡŒΡŽ, государством ΠΈ общСством Π² контСкстС самодСрТавной ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈ управлСния. Π’ Ρ€Π°Π±ΠΎΡ‚Π΅ Π΄ΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π½ΠΎ взаимосвязь ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Ρƒ ΠΈΠ΄Π΅ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³Π΅ΠΌΠΎΠΉ «Москва – Π’Ρ€Π΅Ρ‚ΠΈΠΉ Π ΠΈΠΌΒ» ΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠ½Ρ†Π΅ΠΏΡ‚ΠΎΠΌ «Русский ΠΌΠΈΡ€Β» ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ Π½Π΅ΠΎΡ‚ΡŠΠ΅ΠΌΠ»Π΅ΠΌΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΎΡΡ‚Π°Π²Π»ΡΡŽΡ‰Π΅ΠΉ ΠΈΠ΄Π΅ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ соврСмСнной России; ΠΎΡ‚ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‡Π΅Π½Ρ‹ различия ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Ρƒ нСоСвразийством ΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠ½Ρ†Π΅ΠΏΡ‚ΠΎΠΌ «Русский ΠΌΠΈΡ€Β» Русской православной Ρ†Π΅Ρ€ΠΊΠ²ΠΈ. Dissertation for the Degree of Candidate of Philosophical Studies, Specialty 09.00.11. – Religious Studies. – Ivan Franko Zhytomyr State University Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine. – Zhytomyr, 2016. The thesis presents a philosophical and religious analysis of the ideologem Β«Moscow – the Third RomeΒ» performed by detecting its theological ad ideological essences, determining the characteristics of reflection at different stages of development of Russian religious and philosophical thought and its expression in the modern concept of Β«Russian WorldΒ» of the Russian Orthodox Church. It was proved that ideologem Β«Moscow – the Third RomeΒ» in modern Russia is a very common universal ideologem - historicism with mixed axiological modus. It presents a synthesis of the theological ideas of Christian eschatology and Jewish messianism. At different stages of its operation messianism or misiynist prevails. It was identified that the ideologem Β«Moscow – the Third RomeΒ» had great influence on the relationships between church, state and society in the context of an autocratic model of governance. It was proved that there is a relationship between ideologem Β«Moscow – the Third RomeΒ» and the concept of Β«Russian WorldΒ» as an integral part of modern ideology; It was outlined that there are some differences between neo Eurasianism and the concept of Β«Russian WorldΒ» of the Russian Orthodox Church

    Effect of modifying additions on the ductility and plastic properties and brittle strength of cold-resistant low-alloy steels

    No full text
    Translated from Russian (Svar. Proizvod. 2000 (8) p. 7-13)Available from British Library Document Supply Centre-DSC:9023.190(9768)T / BLDSC - British Library Document Supply CentreSIGLEGBUnited Kingdo

    Aeroelectric structures and turbulence in the atmospheric boundary layer

    No full text
    Complex electrical measurements with the use of sodar data show that electric field pulsation analysis is useful for electrodynamics/turbulence monitoring under different conditions. In particular, the number of aeroelectric structures (AES) generated per hour is a convenient measure of the turbulence intensity. During convectively unstable periods, as many as 5–10 AES form per hour. Under stable conditions, AES occasionally form as well, indicating the appearance of occasional mixing events reflected in the electric field perturbations. AES magnitudes under stable conditions are relatively small, except in special cases such as high humidity and fog. The analysis of electric field (EF) spectra gives additional useful information on the parameters of the atmospheric boundary layer and its turbulence. A rather sharp change in the spectrum slope takes place in the vicinity of 0.02 Hz under stable conditions. The characteristic slope of the spectrum and its change are reproduced in a simple model of EF formation
    corecore