5 research outputs found

    Decreasing Time to Initiation of Chemotherapy for Patients Electively Admitted to a Hematologic Malignancy Service.

    Get PDF
    Background: Delays in initiating elective inpatient chemotherapy can decrease patient satisfaction and increase length of stay. At our institution, we observed that 86% of patients admitted for elective chemotherapy experienced a delay (greater than 6 hours) with a median time to chemotherapy of 18.9 hours. We developed a process improvement initiative to improve time to chemotherapy for elective chemotherapy admissions. Methods: Our outcome measure was time from admission to chemotherapy administration in patients admitted for elective chemotherapy. Process measures were identified and monitored. We collected baseline data and utilized performance improvement tools to identify key drivers. We focused on these key drivers to develop multiple plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycles to improve our outcome measure. Once we started an intervention we collected data every two weeks to assess our intervention. Results: At the time of interim analysis, we observed a median decrease in time to chemotherapy administration from 18.9 hours to 8.85 hours (p value:0.005). Median time to lab resulted decreased from 3.17 hours to 0.00 hours. There was no change in time from signature to nurse releasing the chemotherapy. We noticed more providers were signing the chemotherapy prior to patient admission. Conclusions: By implementing new admission workflows, optimizing our use of the Electronic Medical Record to communicate among providers, and improving pre-admission planning we were able to reduce our median time to chemotherapy for elective admissions by 53.2%. Improvement still needed to meet our goals and to ensure sustainability of these ongoing efforts

    Implementation of a Low-Cost Quality Improvement Intervention Increases Adherence to Cancer Screening Guidelines and Reduces Healthcare Costs at a University Medical Center

    No full text
    Adherence to US Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) cancer screening guidelines remains considerably lower than the recommendation of the Healthy People 2020 initiative. Patient populations recommended for screening are not screened at an appropriate rate, and populations not recommended for screening are inappropriately screened. Closer adherence to guidelines should improve outcomes and reduce costs, estimated to reach 158billion/yearby2020.Weevaluatedwhetherauseoflow−costeducationalhealthmaintenance(HM)cardbymedicalresidentsatauniversityhospitalcouldimpacteducationandadherencetoupdatedcancerscreeningguidelines.Wealsoanalyzedsavingstothehealthcaresystem.Adherencetocervical,breast,andcolorectalcancerscreeningguidelines,definedaspercentagethatwasscreened(ornotscreened)inaccordancewiththeUSPSTFguidelines,inclinicvisitsfromDecember2012(n=336)wascomparedtothosefromDecember2013(n=306)afteraqualityimprovementintervention.Post−intervention,adherencetoscreeningguidelinesincreasedby40.8158 billion/year by 2020. We evaluated whether a use of low-cost educational health maintenance (HM) card by medical residents at a university hospital could impact education and adherence to updated cancer screening guidelines. We also analyzed savings to the healthcare system. Adherence to cervical, breast, and colorectal cancer screening guidelines, defined as percentage that was screened (or not screened) in accordance with the USPSTF guidelines, in clinic visits from December 2012 (n = 336) was compared to those from December 2013 (n = 306) after a quality improvement intervention. Post-intervention, adherence to screening guidelines increased by 40.8% (p \u3c 0.01) for cervical, 33.2% (p \u3c 0.01) for breast, and 20.5% (p \u3c 0.01) for colorectal cancer in average-risk patients. Inappropriate screening was reduced by 26.8% (p \u3c 0.01) for cervical and 32.8% (p \u3c 0.01) for breast cancer. A non-significant 1.1% decrease (p = 0.829) was observed for colorectal cancer. The annual potential savings from avoiding inappropriate screenings were 998,316 (95% CI; 644,484−644,484-1,352,148). We showed a significant absolute increase in USPSTF knowledge of 28.3% irrespective of the house staff level that remained high at 2 years from the educational intervention. The low-cost HM card increased appropriate knowledgeable cancer screening adherence while reducing unnecessary testing and producing substantial savings to the healthcare system

    Implementation of a Low-Cost Quality Improvement Intervention Increases Adherence to Cancer Screening Guidelines and Reduces Healthcare Costs at a University Medical Center

    No full text
    Adherence to US Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) cancer screening guidelines remains considerably lower than the recommendation of the Healthy People 2020 initiative. Patient populations recommended for screening are not screened at an appropriate rate, and populations not recommended for screening are inappropriately screened. Closer adherence to guidelines should improve outcomes and reduce costs, estimated to reach 158billion/yearby2020.Weevaluatedwhetherauseoflow−costeducationalhealthmaintenance(HM)cardbymedicalresidentsatauniversityhospitalcouldimpacteducationandadherencetoupdatedcancerscreeningguidelines.Wealsoanalyzedsavingstothehealthcaresystem.Adherencetocervical,breast,andcolorectalcancerscreeningguidelines,definedaspercentagethatwasscreened(ornotscreened)inaccordancewiththeUSPSTFguidelines,inclinicvisitsfromDecember2012(n = 336)wascomparedtothosefromDecember2013(n = 306)afteraqualityimprovementintervention.Post−intervention,adherencetoscreeningguidelinesincreasedby40.8158 billion/year by 2020. We evaluated whether a use of low-cost educational health maintenance (HM) card by medical residents at a university hospital could impact education and adherence to updated cancer screening guidelines. We also analyzed savings to the healthcare system. Adherence to cervical, breast, and colorectal cancer screening guidelines, defined as percentage that was screened (or not screened) in accordance with the USPSTF guidelines, in clinic visits from December 2012 (n = 336) was compared to those from December 2013 (n = 306) after a quality improvement intervention. Post-intervention, adherence to screening guidelines increased by 40.8% (p \u3c 0.01) for cervical, 33.2% (p \u3c 0.01) for breast, and 20.5% (p \u3c 0.01) for colorectal cancer in average-risk patients. Inappropriate screening was reduced by 26.8% (p \u3c 0.01) for cervical and 32.8% (p \u3c 0.01) for breast cancer. A non-significant 1.1% decrease (p = 0.829) was observed for colorectal cancer. The annual potential savings from avoiding inappropriate screenings were 998,316 (95% CI; 644,484−644,484-1,352,148). We showed a significant absolute increase in USPSTF knowledge of 28.3% irrespective of the house staff level that remained high at 2 years from the educational intervention. The low-cost HM card increased appropriate knowledgeable cancer screening adherence while reducing unnecessary testing and producing substantial savings to the healthcare system

    Aortocavitary fistula as a complication of infective endocarditis and subsequent complete heart block in a patient with severe anemia

    No full text
    Infective endocarditis has different presentations depending on the involvement of valvular and perivalvular structures, and it is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Aortocavitary fistula is a rare complication. We introduce the case of a 48-year-old female with native valve endocarditis, complicated by aortocavitary fistula to the right atrium, and consequently presented with syncope
    corecore