9 research outputs found
Opposing effects of dehydroepiandrosterone and dexamethasone on the generation of monocyte-derived dendritic cells
BACKGROUND: Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) has been suggested as an
immunostimulating steroid hormone, of which the effects on the development
of dendritic cells (DC) are unknown. The effects of DHEA often oppose
those of the other adrenal glucocorticoid, cortisol. Glucocorticoids (GC)
are known to suppress the immune response at different levels and have
recently been shown to modulate the development of DC, thereby influencing
the initiation of the immune response. Variations in the duration of
exposure to, and doses of, GC (particularly dexamethasone (DEX)) however,
have resulted in conflicting effects on DC development. AIM: In this
study, we describe the effects of a continuous high level of exposure to
the adrenal steroid DHEA (10 M) on the generation of immature DC from
monocytes, as well as the effects of the opposing steroid DEX on this
development. RESULTS: The continuous presence of DHEA (10 M) in
GM-CSF/IL-4-induced monocyte-derived DC cultures resulted in immature DC
with a morphology and functional capabilities similar to those of typical
immature DC (T cell stimulation, IL-12/IL-10 production), but with a
slightly altered phenotype of increased CD80 and decreased CD43 expression
(markers of maturity). The continuous presence of DEX at a concentration
of 10 M in the monocyte/DC cultures resulted in the generation of
plastic-adherent macrophage-like cells in place of typical immature DC,
with increased CD14 expression, but decreased expression of the typical DC
markers CD1a, CD40 and CD80. These cells were strongly reactive to acid
phosphatase, but equally capable of stimulating T cell prolifer
1-alpha,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25(OH)(2)D(3)) hampers the maturation of fully active immature dendritic cells from monocytes
Catalytic staudinger/aza-wittig sequence by in situ phosphane oxide reduction
Item does not contain fulltex
The Dutch sociology of education: Its origins, significance and future
Contains fulltext :
28833.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access)As in many other countries the Dutch sociology of education has blossomed into a fully-fledged specialised branch of sociology since the beginning of the 1970s. A tradition of policy-oriented research has also consolidated the position of the sociology of education at the universities. The strength of this relatively small group of specialists lies in the solid empirical basis and use of advanced research techniques and analyses in their work. Theory and reflection are not the strongest qualities of this group. A good organisational structure naturally helps keep the ranks closed. Recently, however, marginalisation of the specialism is threatening because of isolation from general sociology. Mainstream educationalists and policy-makers are also challenging the sociologists of education to make their contribution more explicit than ever
Diversity of the archaeal community in 44 anaerobic digesters as determined by single strand conformation polymorphism analysis and 16S rDNA sequencing
Yield of Screening for COVID-19 in Asymptomatic Patients Before Elective or Emergency Surgery Using Chest CT and RT-PCR (SCOUT): Multicenter Study
OBJECTIVE: To determine the yield of preoperative screening for COVID-19 with chest CT and RT-PCR in patients without COVID-19 symptoms. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Many centers are currently screening surgical patients for COVID-19 using either chest CT, RT-PCR or both, due to the risk for worsened surgical outcomes and nosocomial spread. The optimal design and yield of such a strategy are currently unknown. METHODS: This multicenter study included consecutive adult patients without COVID-19 symptoms who underwent preoperative screening using chest CT and RT-PCR before elective or emergency surgery under general anesthesia. RESULTS: A total of 2093 patients without COVID-19 symptoms were included in 14 participating centers; 1224 were screened by CT and RT-PCR and 869 by chest CT only. The positive yield of screening using a combination of chest CT and RT-PCR was 1.5% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.8-2.1]. Individual yields were 0.7% (95% CI: 0.2-1.1) for chest CT and 1.1% (95% CI: 0.6-1.7) for RT-PCR; the incremental yield of chest CT was 0.4%. In relation to COVID-19 community prevalence, up to approximately 6% positive RT-PCR was found for a daily hospital admission rate >1.5 per 100,000 inhabitants, and around 1.0% for lower prevalence. CONCLUSIONS: One in every 100 patients without COVID-19 symptoms tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 with RT-PCR; this yield increased in conjunction with community prevalence. The added value of chest CT was limited. Preoperative screening allowed us to take adequate precautions for SARS-CoV-2 positive patients in a surgical population, whereas negative patients needed only routine procedures