Diagnosis of neurodegenerative dementia: where do we stand, now?

After many years of large efforts made for understanding the pathogenesis of dementias, the early diagnosis of these degenerative diseases remains an open challenge. Alzheimer's disease (AD) represents the most common form of dementia, followed by Lewy body disease and frontotemporal degeneration. Actually, different pathological processes can determine similar and overlapping clinical syndrome. To detect in vivo the pathological process underlying progressive cognitive and behavior impairment, the Internationals guidelines recommend the use of biological and topographical markers, which can reflect neuropathological modifications in brain. In cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), decrease of amyloid beta 1-42 (A beta 42) and a low ratio of A beta 42 with amyloid beta 1-40 (A beta 42/A beta 40), together with the increase of both total tau protein (t-tau) and phosphorylated tau (p-tau), contribute to define the "Alzheimer's signature". This review points out on the evolution of the concept for early diagnosis of AD, and on the current use of CSF proteins for research purposes and in clinical setting. Then, we discuss the limitations and drawbacks in wide application of CSF biomarkers for diagnosing degenerative dementias, and on the role of laboratory medicine to convey these biomarkers from "research" toward "clinical practice"

How many biomarkers to discriminate neurodegenerative dementia?

A number of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers are currently used for the diagnosis of dementia. Opposite changes in the level of amyloid-β1-42 versus total tau and phosphorylated-tau181 in the CSF reflect the specific pathology of Alzheimer's disease (AD) in the brain. This panel of biomarkers has proven to be effective to differentiate AD from controls and from the major types of neurodegenerative dementia, and to evaluate the progression from mild cognitive impairment to AD. In the absence of specific biomarkers reflecting the pathologies of the other most common forms of dementia, such as Lewy Body disease, Frontotemporal lobar degeneration, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, etc., the evaluation of biomarkers of AD pathology is used, attempting to exclude rather than to confirm AD. Other biomarkers included in the common clinical practice do not clearly relate to the underlying pathology: progranulin (PGRN) is a selective marker of frontotemporal dementia with mutations in the PGRN gene; the 14-3-3 protein is a highly sensitive and specific marker for Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, but has to be used carefully in differentiating rapid progressive dementia; and α-synuclein is an emerging candidate biomarker of the different forms of synucleinopathy. This review summarizes several biomarkers of neurodegenerative dementia validated based on the neuropathological processes occurring in brain tissue. Notwithstanding the paucity of pathologically validated biomarkers and their high analytical variability, the combinations of these biomarkers may well represent a key and more precise analytical and diagnostic tool in the complex plethora of degenerative dementia

Cerebrospinal fluid ferritin and siderophages in the diagnosis of superficial cerebral siderosis

We observed a case of superficial siderosis (SS) of the central nervous system caused by an hemorrhagic trauma forty years before. We questioned whether SS was the stabilized effect of a remote bleeding or an evolutionary process indirectly related to the trauma. Moreover, we aimed to evaluate whether an iron chelator can affect the level of iron deposition. Magnetic Resonance (MRI) demonstrated iron accumulation mainly on the surface of the cerebellum and brain stem. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) microscopic analysis revealed few siderophages; CSF ferritin level was 76 ng/mL (reference value <12). After treatment with an iron chelator (deferiprone) for three months, MRI was unchanged, but the CSF ferritin was about 20% less. The presence of few siderophages supported the hypothesis of a persistent subarachnoid microbleeding. CSF ferritin, as an iron deposition index, allowed a diagnosis of SS and a more sensitive evaluation of the efficacy of the treatment than the MRI

Cerebrospinal fluid levels of a 20-22 kDa NH2 fragment of human tau provide a novel neuronal injury biomarker in Alzheimer's disease and other dementias.

Truncation at N-terminal domain of tau protein is early associated with neurofibrillary pathology in several human tauopathies, including Alzheimer's disease (AD). In affected subjects, the monitoring of total (t-tau) and/or phosphorylated tau (p-tau) levels in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) provides a reliable, indirect evaluation of cellular changes occurring in vivo and the identification of additional CSF biomarkers would better assist with the clinical practice, allowing a broader profile of underlying ongoing neurodegeneration. Here we show that a 20–22 kDa NH2-truncated form of human tau (i.e., NH2htau), a neurotoxic fragment of the full length protein (htau40) that we previously found in synapses from subjects affected by different tauopathies: (i) is not a normal constituent of CSF, unlike t-tau and p-tau, being exceptionally detected in patients without cognitive impairment; (ii) discriminates, with a weak specificity of 65% but a high sensitivity of 85%, patients carrying a large spectrum of neurodegenerative diseases associated with cognitive deterioration (i.e., AD, frontotemporal lobar degeneration, Parkinson's disease with dementia, vascular dementia, mixed dementia, etc.) from subjects affected by other neurological disorders without mnesic disability; and (iii) is a neuronal injury biomarker as its levels in CSF are not related to the severity and progression of cognitive decline. The dynamic evaluation of NH2htau in CSF might add some useful hints in the ordinary clinical practice as it provides a novel, general biomarker for human tauopathies and other neurodegenerative diseases associated with dementia

Cerebrospinal Fluid Aβ42 Levels: When Physiological Become Pathological State

Impaired amyloid beta (Aβ) metabolism is currently considered central to understand the pathophysiology of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Measurements of cerebrospinal fluid Aβ levels remain the most useful marker for diagnostic purposes and to individuate people at risk for AD. Despite recent advances criticized the direct role in neurodegeneration of cortical neurons, Aβ is considered responsible for synaptopathy and impairment of neurotransmission and therefore remains the major trigger of AD and future pharmacological treatment remain Aβ oriented. However, experimental and clinical findings showed that Aβ peptides could have a wider range of action responsible for cell dysfunction and for appearance of clinico-pathological entities different from AD. Such findings may induce misunderstanding of the real role played by Aβ in AD and therefore strengthen criticism on its centrality and need for CSF measurements. Aim of this review is to discuss the role of CSF Aβ levels in light of experimental, clinical pathologic, and electrophysiological results in AD and other pathological entities to put in a correct frame the value of Aβ change