Efficacy and safety of pharmacological interventions for managing sickle cell disease in children and adolescents: protocol for a systematic review with network meta-analysis

IntroductionSickle cell disease (SCD), an inherited haemoglobinopathy, has important impact on morbidity and mortality, especially in paediatrics. Previous systematic reviews are limited to adult patients or focused only on few therapies. We aim to synthesise the evidence on efficacy and safety of pharmacological interventions for managing SCD in children and adolescents.Methods and analysisThis systematic review protocol is available at Open Science Framework (doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/CWAE9). We will follow international recommendations on conduction and report of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Searches will be conducted in PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science (no language nor time restrictions) (first pilot searches performed in May 2022). We will include randomised controlled trials comparing the effects of disease-modifying agents in patients with SCD under 18 years old. Outcomes of interest will include: vaso-occlusive crisis, haemoglobin levels, chest syndrome, stroke, overall survival and adverse events. We will provide a narrative synthesis of the findings, and whenever possible, results will be pooled by means of pairwise or Bayesian network meta-analyses with surface under the cumulative ranking curve analyses. Different statistical methods and models will be tested. Dichotomous outcomes will be reported as OR, risk ratio or HR, while continuous data will be reported as standard mean differences, both with 95% CI/credibility interval. The methodological quality of the trials will be evaluated using the Risk of Bias 2.0 tool, and the certainty of the evidence will be assessed with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.Ethics and disseminationThis study refers to a systematic review, so no ethics approval is necessary. We intent to publish our findings in international, peer-reviewed journal. Data will also be presented to peers in scientific events. Additionally, the results obtained in this study may contribute towards the update of therapeutic guidelines and for the development of health policies for SCD.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42022328471.</jats:sec

The effect of hydroxyurea in the gut microbiome of Angolan children with sickle cell disease

FCT/Aga Khan (project nº330842553).FCT_UIDB/05608/2020. FCT_UIDP/05608/2020.Purpose: Sickle cell disease (SCD) is one of the most prevalent genetic disorders, affecting around 20 to 25 million individuals throughout the world. In Sub-Saharan Africa, where it is more prevalent, it can contribute to up to 80% of under-5 mortality. Clinical manifestations of SCD are very heterogeneous and the intestinal microbiome has recently been reported to be crucial in the modulation of inflammation, cell adhesion, and induction of aged neutrophils, which are key interveners of recurrent vaso-occlusive crises. Since gut bacteria can regulate aged neutrophils, defects in either the integrity of the intestinal walls or a chronic disequilibrium of the microbiota are very likely to emerge in SCD patients. Moreover, it has been suggested that Hydroxyurea (HU), the most common treatment for SCD, shows a multimodal action and may reduce microbiome dysbiosis and aged neutrophils. In this context, we aimed to understand how SCD and HU treatment modulates the microbiome and if these changes could be related to disease severity.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

5595849 THE GUT MICROBIOME AND HYDROXYUREA EFFECT ON SICKLE CELL DISEASE CHILDREN FROM ANGOLA

This work was supported by FCT/Aga Khan (project nº330842553) and FCT/MCTES (UIDB/05608/2020 and UIDP/05608/2020) – H&TRC.Background: Sickle cell disease (SCD) is an inherited hematological disorder and a serious global health problem, affecting between 20 and 25 million people worldwide. In Sub-Saharan Africa, where it is more prevalent, it contributes up to 90% of under-5 mortality. Although hydroxyurea (HU) is the leading treatment for these patients, its effects on the gut microbiome have not yet been explored. Some studies reported that gastroenteritis events were less frequent in SCA children taking HU and it also significantly improved the survival from pneumococcal infections. HU may have a protective effect, not only by improving several hematological parameters but also by lowering the risk of some bacterial infections. Aims: In this context, the aim of this study was to investigate this association by characterizing the gut microbiome of an Angolan SCA pediatric population before and after 6 months of HU treatment and comparing it with a control group of healthy siblings. Results: A total of 113 fecal samples were obtained and sequenced by NGS for the 16S rRNA gene (V3-V4 regions), which corresponded to 40 children in the control and before HU groups and 33 after HU, aged between 4-12 years old. Our findings revealed that these three groups exhibit some notable differences, especially within Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae family. After HU treatment there was an increase of several beneficial bacteria, such as: Blautia coccoides (p=0.009), Blautia luti (p<0.001), Blautia faecis (p=0.008), Bifidobacterium longum (p=0.011), Dorea formicigenerans (p<0.001), Dorea massiliensis (p=0.003), Eubacterium halii (p=0.004), Elusimicrobium spp (p=0.032), Ruminococcus callidus (p=0.037), Ruminococcus faecis (p=0.012), Roseburia spp (p=0.050) and Subdoligranulum variabile (p=0.009). Most of those OTUs are SCFAs producing species, having butyrate or propionate as end-products of bacterial metabolism, both exhibiting anti-inflammatory properties. Moreover, children before HU had a higher abundance of bacteria considered pathogenic, like E. coli (p=0.001), Clostridiun_g24 (p=0.039), and H. influenzae (p=0.050). Conclusion: Overall, this study provides the first evidence of the HU effect on the gut microbiome and provides a rationale for further research for developing treatments to reduce gut microbiota-driven inflammation, which may attenuate the dysbiosis and chronic symptoms experienced by these patients.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

Identification of Genetic Variants in 65 Obesity Related Genes in a Cohort of Portuguese Obese Individuals

Obesity is a major public health problem, which has a strong genetic component that interplays with environmental factors. Several genes are known to be implicated in the regulation of body weight. The identification of alleles that can be associated with obesity is a key element to control this pandemic. On the basis of a Portuguese population, 65 obesity-related genes are sequenced using Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) in 72 individuals with obesity, in order to identify variants associated with monogenic obesity and potential risk factors. A total of 429 variants are identified, 129 of which had already been associated with the phenotype. Comparing our results with the European and Global frequencies, from 1000 Genomes project, 23 potential risk variants are identified. Six new variants are discovered in heterozygous carriers: four missense (genes ALMS1-NM_015120.4:c.5552C>T; SORCS1-NM_001013031.2:c.1072A>G and NM_001013031.2: c.2491A>C; TMEM67-NM_153704.5:c.158A>G) and two synonymous (genes BBS1-NM_024649.4:c.1437C>T; TMEM67-NM_153704.5:c.2583T>C). Functional studies should be performed to validate these new findings and evaluate their penetrance and pathogenicity. Regardless of no cases of monogenic obesity being identified, this kind of investigational study is important when we are still trying to understand the aetiology and pathophysiology of obesity. This will allow the identification of rare variants associated with obesity and the study of their prevalence in specific populational groups.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

5588995 COMPARATIVE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF PHARMACOLOGICAL INTERVENTIONS FOR SICKLE CELL DISEASE IN CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS: A NETWORK META-ANALYSIS

Background: Sickle cell disease (SCD), an inherited hemoglobinopathy characterized by anemia, severe pain, acute chest syndrome (ACS), and vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC), has an important impact on morbidity and mortality worldwide, especially in the pediatric population (over 50% die before age of 5). Although few treatment options are available, new disease-modifying therapies, intended to prevent or reduce SCD-related complications are under development. Previous systematic reviews are limited to adult patients or focused only on gathering data on a few therapies. Aims: Our aim was to synthetize the evidence on the efficacy and safety profiles of pharmacological interventions for managing SCD in children and adolescents. Methods: A systematic review with searches in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science was performed (May-2022). The protocol is registered at PROSPERO CRD42022328471. We included randomized controlled trials comparing any disease-modifying agent used to treat SCD complications in patients under 18 years old. The outcomes of interest included: VOC, ACS, transfusions, hospital admission, discontinuation, and serious adverse events. Data were pooled by means of Bayesian network meta-analyses with the surface under the cumulative ranking curve analyses (SUCRA). Results were reported as odds ratio (OR) with 95% credibility intervals (CrI). Additionally, stochastic multicriteria acceptability analyses (SMAA) were performed. The methodological quality of the trials and certainty of evidence were evaluated through RoB 2.0 tool and the GRADE approach, respectively. Results: Overall, 17 randomized controlled trials (n=1,972 patients) published between 1982-2022, conducted mostly in Africa (41%) and North America (35%) were included for analyses. Around one-third of the trials were restricted to homozygous patients for the SCD allele (SS HMZ); yet when reported, patients with heterozygous S-C combination represented less than 30% of the population. Males accounted for 49.0% of the cases, with ages varying from 1 to 19 years old. Almost all trials (n=15, 88.2%) directly compared active drugs with placebo. The evaluated interventions were: hydroxyurea [n=6 trials], L-arginine [n=3], antiplatelets [n=2], immunotherapy/monoclonal antibodies [n=2], sulfates [n=2], docosahexaenoic acid [n=1], niprisan [n=1] (Figure 1). SUCRA and SMAA revealed that immunotherapy/monoclonal antibodies and hydroxyurea 20 mg/kg are potentially more effective against ACS (17% and 24% probabilities, respectively), VOC (around 29% and 20%, respectively) and needing of transfusions (around 25%), while L-arginine (100-200 mg/kg) and placebo were more associated with these events. Although therapies were overall considered safe, antiplatelet and sulfates may lead to more discontinuations and severe adverse events (uncertainty evidence). Results were similar between age subgroups (<10 years vs. 10-19 years). Summary - Conclusion: The available evidence on the effect of drugs on managing SCD in children and adolescents is still insufficient and weak. No clear definition and reporting criteria for some outcomes exist. Hydroxyurea 20 mg/kg/day may remain the standard of care for these patients, however, long-term, well-designed trials comparing new immunotherapy/monoclonal antibodies should be performed. The use of monotherapies with L-arginine, antiplatelets, or sulfates should be avoided given the poor benefit-risk ratio for this population.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio