Packed red cell transfusions alter mesenteric arterial reactivity and nitric oxide pathway in preterm lambs

BACKGROUND: Cases of necrotizing enterocolitis occurring within 48 h of packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusions are increasingly being described in observational studies. Transfusion-associated gut injury is speculated to result from an abnormal mesenteric vascular response to transfusion. However, the mechanism of disruption of the balance between mesenteric vasoconstriction and relaxation following transfusion is not known. METHODS: Preterm lambs (n = 16, 134 d gestation; term: 145–147 d) were delivered and ventilated for 24 h. All the lambs received orogastric feeds with colostrum. In addition, 10 of these lambs received PRBC transfusions. Vasoreactivity was evaluated in isolated mesenteric arterial rings using norepinephrine and endothelin-1 as vasoconstrictors. Endothelium-dependent (A23187, a calcium ionophore) and endothelium-independent (SNAP) nitric oxide (NO) donors were used as vasorelaxants. Mesenteric arterial endothelial NO synthase (eNOS), soluble guanylyl cyclase (sGC), and phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) mRNA analyses and protein assays were performed. RESULTS: Transfusion with PRBC significantly increased mesenteric vasoconstriction to norepinephrine and endothelin-1 and impaired relaxation to A23187 and SNAP. Mesenteric arterial eNOS protein decreased following PRBC transfusion. No significant changes were noted in sGC and PDE5 mRNA or protein assays. CONCLUSION: PRBC transfusion in enterally fed preterm lambs promotes mesenteric vasoconstriction and impairs vasorelaxation by reducing mesenteric arterial eNOS

Spider–Plant Interactions: An Ecological Approach

Spiders are among the most common animals in diverse terrestrial environments, and display a variety of lifestyles and foraging modes. This chapter represents an overview of our knowledge of spider–plant interactions. Spiders are strongly influenced by plant architecture, rather than being randomly distributed in the vegetation; structures such as rosette-shaped clusters of leaves or glandular trichomes are particularly common in plants that have associations with spiders. Spiders derive benefits from plants such as shelter and access to insect prey. In turn, they can protect plants against herbivory. However, they may also consume or deter pollinators, imposing a cost that can exceed their benefit to the plant. Specific spider–plant associations are mutualistic if spiders provide protective or nutritional benefits, thus improving plant fitness, and if plants provide shelter and suitable foraging sites to spiders. We examine several case studies of spiders living in association with plants, and describe spatial/temporal adaptations in spider–plant relationships