32 research outputs found
Chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells for the immunotherapy of patients with EGFR-expressing advanced relapsed/refractory non-small cell lung cancer
Treatment in EGFR-mutated Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: How to Block the Receptor and overcome Resistance Mechanisms
Noninvasive, Highly Specific Detection of T790M-Mediated Acquired Resistance in EGFR Mutant NSCLC Using a Novel Droplet Digital PCR (ddPCR)–Based Cell-free Plasma DNA (cfDNA) Assay
PP01.36 Blood-Based Biomarker Testing in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Adoption, Biomarker Assessment, and Therapy Selection
PP01.45 Implementation Challenges and Disparities in Molecular Testing for Patients with NSCLC at a Safety-Net Hospital
135O_PR: Plasma genotyping for predicting benefit from osimertinib in patients (pts) with advanced NSCLC
Amplicon-based next-generation sequencing of plasma cell-free DNA for detection of driver and resistance mutations in advanced non-small cell lung cancer
Relationship of tumor fraction in circulating tumor DNA with prognosis in patients with advanced urothelial cancer
Background: Advanced urothelial cancer (aUC) is often characterized by rapid symptomatic disease progression, making early disease control of particular importance. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a promising prognostic biomarker and emerging evidence shows that a single time point/measurement of ctDNA tumor fraction (TF) is prognostic in several other tumor types but has not yet been investigated in aUC. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of ctDNA TF in aUC. Patients and methods: This study used a cohort of patients from a de-identified nationwide (US-based) urothelial clinico-genomic database who underwent ctDNA testing using FoundationOne®Liquid or FoundationOne®Liquid CDx as part of routine care. Patient/disease characteristics and laboratory and treatment data were captured from the electronic health record. Real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) and overall survival (rwOS) were evaluated by ctDNA TF while controlling for relevant covariates. Results: Eighty-three patients with aUC were included. High ctDNA TF (≥1%) was associated with poor prognostic clinical features. High ctDNA TF also correlated with significantly reduced rwPFS in univariable analysis [hazard ratio (HR) 2.01, 95% CI (1.14-3.56), P = 0.01] and after correction for covariates [HR 2.37, 95% CI (0.99-5.66), P = 0.05]. There was a trend toward shorter rwOS in univariable [HR 1.71, 95% CI (0.87-3.36)] and multivariable [HR 1.55, (0.57-4.23)] analysis. Conclusions: ctDNA TF is a prognostic biomarker in aUC with potential to inform expected longevity of patients. Uniform cohorts, with regard to treatments given and line of therapy, would help further evaluate the ability of ctDNA TF to identify patients with aggressive disease and inform the design of future studies to personalize therapeutic decision making
