7 research outputs found

    In vivo differentiated cytokine-producing CD4+ T cells express functional CCR7

    No full text
    Chemokines and their receptors fulfill specialized roles in inflammation and under homeostatic conditions. CCR7 and its ligands, CCL19 and CCL21, are involved in lymphocyte recirculation through secondary lymphoid organs and additionally navigate lymphocytes into distinct tissue compartments. The role of CCR7 in the migration of polarized T effector/memory cell subsets in vivo is still poorly understood. We therefore analyzed murine and human CD4+ cytokine-producing cells developed in vivo for their chemotactic reactivity to CCR7 ligands. The responses of cells producing cytokines, such as IFN-{gamma}, IL-4, and IL-10, as well as of subsets defined by memory or activation markers were comparable to that of naive CD4+ cells, with slightly lower reactivity in cells expressing IL-10 or CD69. This indicates that CCR7 ligands are able to attract naive as well as the vast majority of activated and effector/memory T cell stages. Chemotactic reactivity of these cells toward CCL21 was absent in CCR7-deficient cells, proving that effector cells do not use alternative receptors for this chemokine. Th1 cells generated from CCR7−/− mice failed to enter lymph nodes and Peyer’s patches, but did enter a site of inflammation. These findings indicate that CD4+ cells producing effector cytokines upon stimulation retain the capacity to recirculate through lymphoid tissues via CCR7

    Chemokine Receptors in Allergic Lung Disease

    No full text

    Negative confounding in the evaluation of toxicity: the case of methylmercury in fish and seafood.

    No full text
    International audienceIn observational studies, the presence of confounding [corrected] can distort the true association between an exposure and a toxic-effect outcome, if the confounding variable is not controlled for in the study design or analysis phase. While confounding is often assumed to occur in the same direction as the toxicant exposure, the relationship between the benefits and risks associated with fish and seafood consumption is a classic example of negative confounding: the exposure to methylmercury occurs with fish and seafood, which are also associated with beneficial nutrients, and the signs of mercury toxicity [corrected] Mercury and nutrients may affect the same epidemiological outcomes, but most studies addressing one of them have ignored the potential for negative confounding by the other. This article reviews the existing evidence of effects of both nutrient and contaminant intakes as predictors of neurodevelopmental and cardiovascular outcomes. Substantial underestimation of the effects of mercury toxicity and of fish benefits occurs from the lack of confounder adjustment and imprecision of the exposure parameters. Given this inherent bias in observational studies, regulatory agencies should reconsider current dietary advice in order to provide better guidance to consumers in making prudent choices to maintain a nutritious diet with seafood that is low in mercury concentrations. Attention should also be paid to the occurrence of negative confounding in other connections

    Negative Confounding in the Evaluation of Toxicity: The Case of Methylmercury in Fish and Seafood

    No full text
    corecore