Impact of patient delay in a modern real world STEMI network

Background: The impact of patient delay on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), when system delay has performance that meets the current recommended guidelines, is poorly investigated. Methods: We evaluated a cohort of STEMI patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) and with an ECG STEMI diagnosis to wire crossing time (ETW) 64120 min. Independent predictors of pre-discharge decreased LVEF ( 6445%) were analyzed. Results: 490 STEMI patients with both ETW time 64120 min and available pre-discharge LVEF were evaluated. Mean age was 64.2 \ub1 12 years, 76.2% were male, 19.5% were diabetics, 42.7% had and anterior myocardial infarction (MI), and 9.8% were in Killip class III\u2013IV. Median time of patient's response to initial symptoms (patient delay) was 58,5 (IQR 30;157) minutes and median ETW time was 78 (IQR 62\u201395) minutes. 115 patients (23.4%) had pre-discharge LVEF 6445%. At multivariable analysis independent predictors of decreased LVEF ( 6445%) were anterior MI (OR 4,659, 95% CI 2,618-8,289, p < 0,001), Killip class (OR 1,449, 95% CI 1,090-1,928, p = 0,011) and patients delay above the median (OR 2,030, 95% CI 1,151\u20133.578, p = 0,014). These independent predictors were confirmed in patients with ETW time 6490 min. Conclusions: When system delay meets the recommended criteria for pPCI, patient delay becomes an independent predictor of pre-discharge LVEF. These findings provide further insights into the potential optimization of STEMI management and identify a target that needs to be improved, considering that still a significant proportion of patients continue to delay seeking medical care

Right ventricular dysfunction in right coronary artery infarction: A primary PCI registry analysis

Right ventricular involvement in inferior myocardial infarction (MI) was historically associated with a poor prognosis. However, few studies addressed the impact of right ventricular (RV) dysfunction in the primary percutaneous intervention (pPCI) era. Our aim was to assess the prognostic significance of RV dysfunction in right coronary artery (RCA) related MI treated with pPCI. Methods: A total of 298 patients with a RCA related MI undergone pPCI between January 2011 and June 2015 were included. RV dysfunction was defined by a RV-FAC <35% at echocardiographic examination and further divided into mild (RV-FAC between 35 and 25%) and moderate-severe (RV-FAC <25%). RV function before discharge was reassessed in 95% of the study cohort. The primary endpoint was overall mortality. Median follow-up was 29 months. Results: In RCA related MI, moderate-severe (HR 5.882, p = 0.002, 95% CI 1.882-18.385) but not mild RV dysfunction independently predicted lower survival at follow-up along with age (HR 1.104, p <0.001, CI 1.045-1.167). Importantly, patients recovering RV function at discharge showed a lower mortality (p = 0.001) vs patients with persistent moderate-severe RV dysfunction) that approached the risk of patients without RV dysfunction at presentation. Conclusion: In RCA related MI treated with pPCI, RV dysfunction was one of the strongest independent predictor of lower overall survival. However, patients with only transient RV dysfunction showed a better prognosis compared to patients who had persistent RV dysfunction. The focus on intensive support management of the RV in the first hours after pPCI may be important to overcome the acute phase and to promote RV recovery

Insufficienza tricuspidale e indicazioni al trattamento

Tricuspid regurgitation is a frequent valvular heart disease, particularly in the elderly and in association with other left-sided heart diseases. It has an adverse prognostic impact, with progressively increasing mortality as the degree of regurgitation increases. Isolated or combined (with mitral and/or aortic) surgery remains the treatment of choice, provided operative risk is acceptable. Several transcatheter treatment techniques, currently in early clinical or preclinical study phase, could provide alternative treatment options for patients with high surgical risk

Outcomes of Elderly Patients with ST-Elevation or Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Introduction: Acute coronary syndromes (ACS) have been classified according to the finding of ST-segment elevation on the presenting electrocardiogram, with different treatment strategies and practice guidelines. However, a comparative description of the clinical characteristics and outcomes of acute coronary syndrome elderly patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention during index admission has not been published so far. Methods: Retrospective cohort study of patients enrolled in the Elderly ACS-2 multicenter randomized trial. Main outcome measures were crude cumulative incidence and cause-specific hazard ratio (cHR) of cardiovascular death, noncardiovascular death, reinfarction, and stroke. Results: Of 1443 ACS patients aged >75 years (median age 80 years, interquartile range 77-84), 41% were classified as ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and 59% had non-ST-elevation ACS (NSTEACS) (48% NSTEMI and 11% unstable angina). As compared with those with NSTEACS, STEMI patients had more favorable baseline risk factors, fewer prior cardiovascular events, and less severe coronary disease, but lower ejection fraction (45% vs 50%, P <.001). At a median follow-up of 12 months, 51 (8.6%) STEMI patients had died, vs 39 (4.6%) NSTEACS patients. After adjusting for sex, age, and previous myocardial infarction, the hazard among the STEMI group was significantly higher for cardiovascular death (cHR 1.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-3.36), noncardiovascular death (cHR 2.10; 95% CI, 1.01-4.38), and stroke (cHR 4.8; 95% CI, 1.7-13.7). Conclusions: Despite more favorable baseline characteristics, elderly STEMI patients have worse survival and a higher risk of stroke compared with NSTEACS patients after percutaneous coronary intervention

Endomyocardial fibrosis of the right ventricle: A case report of successful surgery

Aims: The case we report, shows a successful treatment of right ventricle endomyocardial fibrosis. Materials and Methods: Surgical therapy by endocardial decortication seems to be beneficial for many patients with advanced disease who are in functional-therapeutic class III or IV. The operative mortality rate is high, but successful surgery has a clear benefit on symptoms and seems to favourably affect survival as well

Results and follow-up after implantation of four or more sirolimus-eluting stents in the same patient

The aim of this study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of > or =4 sirolimus-eluting stent (SES; Cypher, Cordis, Johnson and Johnson) implantation. The safety of implantation of > or =4 SESs in the same patient and setting has not been established. Furthermore, it has been hypothesized that sirolimus administration with the use of multiple stents may diminish the platelet inhibitory effects of clopidogrel and may trigger drug-drug interactions. We identified 96 consecutive patients (96 procedures) who underwent implantation of > or =4 SESs in 365 lesions (438 stents) during the same procedure. All patients received aspirin indefinitely and clopidogrel or ticlopidine for at least 1 year postprocedure; 57% and 47% of the patients were on calcium channel blocker and statin therapy, respectively. All stents were successfully deployed and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors were used in 50% of the procedures. There were no in-hospital deaths, Q-wave myocardial infarction (MI), urgent bypass surgery, or repeat percutaneous coronary intervention; 18 patients (19%) suffered non-Q-wave MI (defined as CK-MB elevation >3 times the upper limit of normal). At 30-day follow-up, there was one (1%) subacute thrombosis resulting in target lesion revascularization. At mean follow-up time of 15.4 +/- 6.2 months, the frequency of target lesion revascularization, target vessel revascularization, and major adverse cardiac event rates were 12%, 16%, and 18%, respectively. No other notable clinical events that might have been attributed to the possible drug-drug interactions or discontinuation of concomitant antithrombotic, statin, or calcium channel blocker therapy were reported. Multiple (> or =4) SES implantation appears safe with no increase in major adverse cardiac events

Chapter 8: Role of Cardiac Imaging: Cardiac Magnetic Resonance and Cardiac Computed Tomography

Cardiovascular imaging is key for the assessment of patients with heart failure. Today, both cardiac magnetic resonance and cardiac computed tomography play an established role in the assessment of patients with suspected and confirmed heart failure syndromes. In particular, cardiac magnetic resonance is of paramount importance in identifying etiology of left ventricular dysfunction. It has an increasing role in prognostic stratification and in clinical decision-making around therapy. Key strengths include its ability to characterize myocardial tissue, unrestricted field of view, lack of radiation, as well as accuracy and reproducibility. Cardiac computed tomography has become an important tool in the management of patients with congestive heart failure. Advances in scanner technology have increased its spatial and temporal resolution to unprecedented levels while resulting in decreasing radiation doses. The primary diagnostic application is in differentiation of ischemic from nonischemic etiology of left ventricular dysfunction. Its role in tissue characterization shows promise and is increasingly being studied

Focus on arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy is a myocardial disease generally caused by desmosomal mutations and characterized by progressive replacement of cardiomyocites with fibro-adipose tissue. In the classic form of the disease right ventricle is predominantly affected. However, biventricular and left-dominant variants have been recently recognized, leading to the new nosological definition of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy. The condition affects mostly young adults and athletes and is clinically characterized by ventricular arrhythmias, heart failure and sudden cardiac death. The diagnosis is based on clinical-instrumental criteria, including family history, morpho-functional and electrocardiographic abnormalities, ventricular arrhythmias and genetic defects (Task Force Criteria, 2010). The main goal in the management of patients is the prevention of sudden cardiac death, where implantable cardioverter-defibrillator is the only effective therapeutic strategy. Many arrhythmic risk factors have been described. Recently, an on-line calculator has been proposed, but it needs further validation