612 research outputs found

    Equivalence between the real time Feynman histories and the quantum shutter approaches for the "passage time" in tunneling

    Get PDF
    We show the equivalence of the functions Gp(t)G_{\rm p}(t) and Ψ(d,t)2|\Psi(d,t)|^2 for the ``passage time'' in tunneling. The former, obtained within the framework of the real time Feynman histories approach to the tunneling time problem, using the Gell-Mann and Hartle's decoherence functional, and the latter involving an exact analytical solution to the time-dependent Schr\"{o}dinger equation for cutoff initial waves

    Reply to the Comment on "Resonant Spectra and the Time Evolution of the Survival and Nonescape Probabilities"

    Full text link
    In our paper [Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 337 (1995)], we derived an exact expression for the survival and nonescape probabilities as an expansion in terms of resonant states. It was shown that these quantities exhibit at long times a different behavior. Although both decay as a power law, they have different exponents. In this paper we show that, contrary to the claim in the Comment of R. M. Cavalcanti (quant-ph/9704023), the nonescape probability decay for long times as an inverse power law.Comment: 1 page, RevTex file, to appear in Phys. Rev. Let

    Delay time and tunneling transient phenomena

    Get PDF
    Analytic solutions to the time-dependent Schr\"odinger equation for cutoff wave initial conditions are used to investigate the time evolution of the transmitted probability density for tunneling. For a broad range of values of the potential barrier opacity α\alpha, we find that the probability density exhibits two evolving structures. One refers to the propagation of a {\it forerunner} related to a {\it time domain resonance} [Phys. Rev. A {\bf 64}, 0121907 (2001)], while the other consists of a semiclassical propagating wavefront. We find a regime where the {\it forerunners} are absent, corresponding to positive {\it time delays}, and show that this regime is characterized by opacities α<αc\alpha < \alpha_c. The critical opacity αc\alpha_c is derived from the analytical expression for the {\it delay time}, that reflects a link between transient effects in tunneling and the {\it delay time}Comment: To be published in Physical Review

    Transient tunneling effects of resonance doublets in triple barrier systems

    Get PDF
    Transient tunneling effects in triple barrier systems are investigated by considering a time-dependent solution to the Schr\"{o}dinger equation with a cutoff wave initial condition. We derive a two-level formula for incidence energies EE near the first resonance doublet of the system. Based on that expression we find that the probability density along the internal region of the potential, is governed by three oscillation frequencies: one of them refers to the well known Bohr frequency, given in terms of the first and second resonance energies of the doublet, and the two others, represent a coupling with the incidence energy EE. This allows to manipulate the above frequencies to control the tunneling transient behavior of the probability density in the short-time regim

    Dynamical description of the buildup process in resonant tunneling: Evidence of exponential and non-exponential contributions

    Full text link
    The buildup process of the probability density inside the quantum well of a double-barrier resonant structure is studied by considering the analytic solution of the time dependent Schr\"{o}dinger equation with the initial condition of a cutoff plane wave. For one level systems at resonance condition we show that the buildup of the probability density obeys a simple charging up law, Ψ(τ)/ϕ=1eτ/τ0,| \Psi (\tau) / \phi | =1-e^{-\tau /\tau_0}, where ϕ\phi is the stationary wave function and the transient time constant τ0\tau_0 is exactly two lifetimes. We illustrate that the above formula holds both for symmetrical and asymmetrical potential profiles with typical parameters, and even for incidence at different resonance energies. Theoretical evidence of a crossover to non-exponential buildup is also discussed.Comment: 4 pages, 2 figure

    Full time nonexponential decay in double-barrier quantum structures

    Get PDF
    We examine an analytical expression for the survival probability for the time evolution of quantum decay to discuss a regime where quantum decay is nonexponential at all times. We find that the interference between the exponential and nonexponential terms of the survival amplitude modifies the usual exponential decay regime in systems where the ratio of the resonance energy to the decay width, is less than 0.3. We suggest that such regime could be observed in semiconductor double-barrier resonant quantum structures with appropriate parameters.Comment: 6 pages, 5 figure

    Time evolution of decay of two identical quantum particles

    Full text link
    An analytical solution for the time evolution of decay of two identical non interacting quantum particles seated initially within a potential of finite range is derived using the formalism of resonant states. It is shown that the wave function, and hence also the survival and nonescape probabilities, for factorized symmetric and entangled symmetric/antisymmetric initial states evolve in a distinctive form along the exponentially decaying and nonexponential regimes. Our findings show the influence of the Pauli exclusion principle on decay. We exemplify our results by solving exactly the s-wave delta shell potential model.Comment: 14 pages, 3 figures, added references and discussio

    Free initial wave packets and the long-time behavior of the survival and nonescape probabilities

    Full text link
    The behavior of both the survival S(t) and nonescape P(t) probabilities at long times for the one-dimensional free particle system is shown to be closely connected to that of the initial wave packet at small momentum. We prove that both S(t) and P(t) asymptotically exhibit the same power-law decrease at long times, when the initial wave packet in momentum representation behaves as O(1) or O(k) at small momentum. On the other hand, if the integer m becomes greater than 1, S(t) and P(t) decrease in different power-laws at long times.Comment: 4 pages, 3 figures, Title and organization changed, however the results not changed, To appear in Phys. Rev.

    Tunneling dynamics in relativistic and nonrelativistic wave equations

    Full text link
    We obtain the solution of a relativistic wave equation and compare it with the solution of the Schroedinger equation for a source with a sharp onset and excitation frequencies below cut-off. A scaling of position and time reduces to a single case all the (below cut-off) nonrelativistic solutions, but no such simplification holds for the relativistic equation, so that qualitatively different ``shallow'' and ``deep'' tunneling regimes may be identified relativistically. The nonrelativistic forerunner at a position beyond the penetration length of the asymptotic stationary wave does not tunnel; nevertheless, it arrives at the traversal (semiclassical or B\"uttiker-Landauer) time "tau". The corresponding relativistic forerunner is more complex: it oscillates due to the interference between two saddle point contributions, and may be characterized by two times for the arrival of the maxima of lower and upper envelops. There is in addition an earlier relativistic forerunner, right after the causal front, which does tunnel. Within the penetration length, tunneling is more robust for the precursors of the relativistic equation

    Time scale of forerunners in quantum tunneling

    Full text link
    The forerunners preceding the main tunneling signal of the wave created by a source with a sharp onset or by a quantum shutter, have been generally associated with over-the-barrier (non-tunneling) components. We demonstrate that, while this association is true for distances which are larger than the penetration lenght, for smaller distances the forerunner is dominated by under-the-barrier components. We find that its characteristic arrival time is inversely proportional to the difference between the barrier energy and the incidence energy, a tunneling time scale different from both the phase time and the B\"uttiker-Landauer (BL) time.Comment: Revtex4, 14 eps figure
    corecore