Mutual intelligibility between West and South Slavic languages

In the present study we tested the level of mutual intelligibility between three West Slavic (Czech, Slovak and Polish) and three South Slavic languages (Croatian, Slovene and Bulgarian). Three different methods were used: a word translation task, a cloze test and a picture task. The results show that in most cases, a division between West and South Slavic languages does exist and that West Slavic languages are more intelligible among speakers of West Slavic languages than among those of South Slavic languages. We found an asymmetry in Croatian-Slovene intelligibility, whereby Slovene speakers can understand written and spoken Croatian better than vice versa. Finally, we compared the three methods and found that the word translation task and the cloze test give very similar results, while the results of the picture task are somewhat unreliable

Sprachportrait Friesisch

Item does not contain fulltex

A distinção contável-massivo e a expressão de número no sistema nominal The count-mass distinction and the expression of number within nominal systems

Este trabalho investiga a distinção contável-massivo entre os nomes comuns. Em particular, nos debruçamos sobre a distinção contável-massivo e sua relação com a morfologia de número. Defendemos que não existe uma correspondência tipológica necessária entre a ausência de marcação de número e a inexistência de uma distinção entre nomes contáveis e nomes massivos. Além disso, a classificação das abordagens da distinção contável-massivo proposta por Joosten (2002) é apresentada com a finalidade de mostrar que essa distinção pode ser tratada ou como uma distinção lexical entre as denotações dos nomes comuns ou como uma distinção entre tipos de sintagmas nominais.<br>This work investigates the count-mass distinction within natural language nominal systems. In particular, we focus on the count-mass distinction and its relation to number morphology. We claim that there is no necessary typological correlation between the lack of number marking and the nonexistence of a count-mass distinction for common nouns. Joosten's (2002) proposal is presented with the purpose of showing that the count-mass distinction can be treated either as a lexical distinction among the denotations of common nouns, or as a distinction among Noun Phrase constituents