Rethinking non-traditional resistance at work : the case of the Indian Diaspora in Mauritius

Resistance at work can take many forms and this is reflected in the multiple ways it has been theorised in research. In this paper, I use postcolonial theory to analyse employee resistance in Mauritius. To do this, I deploy Homi Bhabha’s concepts of mimicry, ambivalence and hybridity to explore non-traditional forms of resistance among the Indian Diaspora working in the hotel industry. Using ethnographic research, I firstly look at its ‘home’-making practices as it is within the home that visions of community emerge (Bhabha, 1994) which could later influence behaviours at work. I argue that the Diaspora maintains connections with its ancestral roots via routine religious practices and language use while concomitantly resisting assimilation in the local context. The analysis is then extended to their workplace where further forms of non-traditional resistance are found to be enacted which are strongly influenced by the same values emerging at home

Long-term follow-up of persons diagnosed with multidrug-resistant TB in Chennai, India, 2013-2020

India has the largest number of multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) cases, defined as Mycobacterium tuberculosis resistant to at least isoniazid (INH) and rifampicin (RIF).1 However, less than half of all persons with MDR-TB in India successfully complete treatment.1 Although initial end-of-treatment outcomes offer a standardised time point to assess the effect of treatment, these tend to underestimate the overall burden of unfavourable long-term outcomes among persons treated for TB.2,3 The long-term outcomes of persons diagnosed with MDR-TB in India, including the proportion with recurrent TB disease or mortality, are unknown. This analysis was conducted under programmatic conditions in a high-burden setting, with no regular check-ups after treatment. The results can be used to show the burden of recurrent illness and death following treatment, and can be used as a benchmark to measure improvement

Problematizing fit and survival: transforming the law of requisite variety through complexity misalignment

The law of requisite variety is widely employed in management theorizing and is linked with core strategy themes such as contingency and fit. We reflect upon requisite variety as an archetypal borrowed concept. We contrast its premises with insights from the institutional literature and commitment literature, draw propositions that set boundaries to its applicability, and review the ramifications of what we call “complexity misalignment.” In this way we contradict foundational assumptions of the law, problematize adaptation- and survival-centric views of strategizing, and theorize the role of human agency in variously complex regimes