A new self-ligating lingual bracket with square slots.

No abstract

Approche simplifiée de l’orthodontie linguale - attache STb Light Lingual System

La demande de traitements esthétiques, efficaces, rapides et non contraignants est de plus en plus prégnante dans notre société. Les attaches STb et le concept «Light Lingual System» permettent une réponse adaptée à ces exigences. En concevant un bracket de petit volume simple du point de vue de son utilisation et de sa mise en place, nous apportons des réponses tant pour les orthodontistes que pour les patients. Cet article permet d’éclairer le lecteur sur différents points et montre l’intérêt d’un tel matériel

Orthodontic Set Up

Orthodontic set up

Three-dimensional finite-element analysis of a central lower incisor under labial and lingual loads

Introduction: The aim was to evaluate the differences between labial and lingual application of an orthodontic force. This was achieved using a three-dimensional CAD design software model of a real lower incisor surrounded by a prismatic representation of the mandibular bone. This model was subjected to various loading conditions, with finite-element analysis. Materials and methods: Cone-beam computed tomography scanning was used to create a three-dimensional geometric model of a lower incisor, together with its simulated periodontal ligament. This model was then meshed and analysed with commercial finite-element code. Various single and combined forces and moments were applied to each side of the simulated lower incisor at the centre of the clinical crown. To evaluate the effects of the various forces considered, the instantaneous displacement and stress generated in the bone and the periodontal ligament were measured, as a comparison of the labial and lingual loading sites. Results: Dental movement was only influenced by the side of the force application when an intrusive component was present. The simulations showed larger displacement when a vertical force was present at the lingual surface. In general, this movement was of the tipping type when the combined forces were applied, while there was greater intrusion upon application of combined forces and an anticlockwise moment to the labial surface. Conclusions: Application of an intrusive lingual force to a lower incisor appears to generate bodily movement, while the same intrusive labial force appears to lead to labial tipping. Subject to further study, this should be taken into consideration when devising treatment plans for fixed appliance

A new lingual straight-wire technique.

No abstract

Changes in the oral environment after placement of lingual and labial orthodontic appliances.

This study compared the oral hygiene and caries risk of patients treated with labial and lingual orthodontic appliances throughout a prospective evaluation of the status of the oral environment before and after bracket placement. A total of 20 orthodontic patients aged 19 to 23 years were included in the study and were divided into two groups: 10 patients wore Roth labial appliance (American Orthodontics, Sheboygan, WI, USA) and 10 patients wore STb lingual appliance (Ormco Corporation, Glendora, CA, USA). Plaque index (PI), gingival bleeding index (GBI), salivary flow rate, saliva buffer capacity, salivary pH, and Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus counts in saliva were determined at three time points: before orthodontic appliance placement (T0), 4 weeks after bonding (T1), and 8 weeks after bonding (T2). After appliance placement, all patients were periodically educated to the oral hygiene procedures. Wilcoxon rank and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to determine intragroup and intergroup differences as regards qualitative data. To compare quantitative data between the groups, chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were undertaken, while intragroup differences were tested with McNemar test. The level of statistical significance was set at p<0.05. Statistical analysis of the data obtained revealed a statistically significant difference between the data of T0 and T1 and the data of T0 and T2 of the PI scores and between T0 and T2 of the GBI scores in the group treated with the lingual appliance. The GBI value increased significantly between T0 and T1 but decreased significantly between T1 and T2 (p<0.01) in the group treated with labial appliance. S. mutans counts increased significantly between T0 and T2 in the saliva samples of patients treated with lingual appliance. No statistically significant differences were found between S. mutans and Lactobacillus counts at the three terms of saliva collection in patients treated with labial appliance. No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups at the three time points as regards the salivary flow rate and saliva buffer capacity. Lingual and labial orthodontic appliances showed a different potential in modifying the investigated clinical parameters: patients wearing STb lingual orthodontic appliance had more plaque retention 4 and 8 weeks after bonding, while there were more gingival inflammation and more S. mutans counts 8 weeks after bonding. No differences were found between the two groups as regards the Lactobacillus counts, the salivary flow rate, and saliva buffer capacity

Wire load-deflection characteristics relative to different types of brackets.

To test the hypothesis that the dimension of the bracket, both in labial and in lingual orthodontics, is a relevant parameter to determine the forces acting on the teeth, and that some wires commonly used in labial orthodontics (0.016"-diameter SS, TMA and Nitinol) are not suitable for the first phase of lingual treatment.An ideal dental cast was bonded with eight different brackets (Damon 3MX, Ovation, Time 2, Innovation and Smart Clip Clarity on the vestibular face; STB, Adenta Time and Innovation-L on the lingual). After photographic documentation, the interbracket distance was calculated for each type of bracket, using ImageJ software. The mean elasticity modulus of the tested wires was obtained from the review of the available literature. The theoretical wire load on every tooth was calculated mathematically at three different levels of deflection (0.5mm; 1.0mm and 1.5mm), on both the labial and lingual sides, for all types of bracket.The lingual arch in the anterior segment is always shorter than the vestibular arch. The different brackets, having different dimensions, have an influence on the interbracket distance, and, consequently, on the wire load. At large deflections, superelastic NiTi expresses light and continuous forces, which are significantly lower than the other examined alloys.The initial hypothesis was supported. Because of the reduced interbracket distance, the adoption of superelastic wires is required in lingual mechanics and with smaller diameter compared to labial mechanotherapy, in particular during the first phases of treatment. The use of a bracket with reduced mesiodistal dimensions can contribute to reduce the load on the teeth

A comparative study of lingual bracket bond strength.

Aim: To compare the adhesive potential, the mechanics implicated in adhesive failure, and the effect on the enamel of four brands of lingual brackets. Methods: One hundred sixty premolars and four types of commercially available lingual brackets (STB, ORG, Magic, and Stealth) were selected. Forty brackets per manufacturer were used, half bonded directly and half indirectly. Each of these bonding groups was further subdivided: 10 brackets were bonded without treatment, while the other 10 were sandblasted. Thus, a total of four groups were created for each type of bracket: (a) sandblasted and directly bonded, (b) sandblasted and indirectly bonded, (c) not sandblasted and directly bonded, and (d) not sandblasted and indirectly bonded. Immediately after bonding, each bracket was tested for adhesion strength, and each appliance was then examined via electron microscopy to calculate the ARI. Results: Statistical analysis showed a significant difference among the four bracket types; a general improvement in lingual appliance mechanical features provoked by sandblasting, albeit with some exceptions; and no significant effect of bonding method on the degree of bond strength. The ARI revealed that the most common area of adhesion crisis was at the adhesive-bracket interface. Conclusion: Overall, STB brackets performed better, and sandblasting proved to be an efficient way of improving the mechanical features of lingual brackets. Bonding technique, on the other hand, did not seem to exert a great influence on bonding success, and the bracket-adhesive interface was identified as the area most prone to failure