Inflammatory myoglandular polyp of the cecum: case report and review of literature

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Inflammatory myoglandular polyp (IMGP) is a rare non-neoplastic polyp of the large bowel, commonly with a distal localization (rectosigmoid), obscure in its pathogenesis. Up till now, 60 cases of IMGP have been described in the literature, but none located in the cecum.</p> <p>Case presentation</p> <p>We report a case of a 53-year-old man who was admitted to our hospital for further evaluation of positive fecal occult blood test associated to anemia. A colonoscopy identified a red, sessile, lobulated polyp of the cecum, 4.2 cm in diameter, partially ulcerated. The histological examination of the biopsy revealed the presence of inflammatory granulation tissue with lymphocytic and eosinophil infiltration associated to a fibrous stroma: it was diagnosed as inflammatory fibroid polyp. Considering the polyp's features (absence of a peduncle and size) that could increase the risk of a polypectomy, a surgical resection was performed. Histological examination of the specimen revealed inflammatory granulation tissue in the lamina propria, hyperplastic glands with cystic dilatations, proliferation of smooth muscle and multiple erosions on the polyp surface: this polyp was finally diagnosed as IMGP. There was also another little polyp next to the ileocecal valve, not revealed at the colonoscopy, 0.8 cm in diameter, diagnosed as tubulovillous adenoma with low grade dysplasia.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>This is the first case of IMGP of the cecum. It is a benign lesion of unknown pathogenesis and must be considered different from other non-neoplastic polyps of the large bowel such as inflammatory cap polyps (ICP), inflammatory cloacogenic polyps, juvenile polyps (JP), inflammatory fibroid polyps (IFP), polyps secondary to mucosal prolapse syndrome (MPS), polypoid prolapsing mucosal folds of diverticular disease. When symptomatic, IMGP should be removed endoscopically, whereas surgical resection is reserved only in selected patients as in our case.</p

Gluten Induces Subtle Histological Changes in Duodenal Mu-cosa of Patients with Non-Coeliac Gluten Sensitivity: A Multi-center Study

Histological changes induced by gluten in the duodenal mucosa of patients with non-coeliac gluten sensitivity (NCGS) are poorly defined. Objectives: To evaluate the structural and inflammatory features of NCGS compared to controls and coeliac disease (CeD) with milder enteropathy (Marsh I-II). Methods: Well-oriented biopsies of 262 control cases with normal gastroscopy and histologic findings, 261 CeD, and 175 NCGS biopsies from 9 contributing countries were examined. Villus height (VH, in μm), crypt depth (CrD, in μm), villus-to-crypt ratios (VCR), IELs (intraepithelial lymphocytes/100 enterocytes), and other relevant histological, serologic, and demographic parameters were quantified. Results: The median VH in NCGS was significantly shorter (600, IQR: 400−705) than controls (900, IQR: 667−1112) (p < 0.001). NCGS patients with Marsh I-II had similar VH and VCR to CeD [465 µm (IQR: 390−620) vs. 427 µm (IQR: 348−569, p = 0·176)]. The VCR in NCGS with Marsh 0 was lower than controls (p < 0.001). The median IEL in NCGS with Marsh 0 was higher than controls (23.0 vs. 13.7, p < 0.001). To distinguish Marsh 0 NCGS from controls, an IEL cut-off of 14 showed 79% sensitivity and 55% specificity. IEL densities in Marsh I-II NCGS and CeD groups were similar. Conclusion: NCGS duodenal mucosa exhibits distinctive changes consistent with an intestinal response to luminal antigens, even at the Marsh 0 stage of villus architecture

ENDOSCOPY PITFALLS IN CELIAC DISEASE DIAGNOSIS; A MULTICENTRE STUDY

Introduction The traditional diagnosis of celiac disease (CD) requires a small bowel biopsy to identify at histology the characteristic mucosal changes. The current biopsy practise among endoscopists for celiac disease is in most part unknown. The aims of this study were to compare the different diagnostic criteria in various centres in Italy, Iran, Lithuania, Romania and the UK, the methodological approach to the biopsy and to investigate the pitfalls of CD diagnosis. To measure the number of specimens submitted during duodenal biopsy among patients in Italy, Iran, Lithuania, Romania and the UK, and to determine the incremental diagnostic yield of adherence to the recommended number of specimens. Methods A total of 931 patients who underwent duodenal biopsy for CD were recruited prospectively at nine centres in European and Middle East countries. Small-bowel biopsies were obtained from the duodenal bulb and the second part of the duodenum (and from the duodenal bulb when it had a micronodular appearance). The histopathological appearances were described according to the modified Marsh classification. Results The most frequent degree of villous atrophy amongst Iranian subjects was 3A and that of the rest of the study population was 3C. The most common number of biopsy specimens for Romanian subjects was 1 (52%) followed by 2 for Iranian (56%), 3 for Lithuanian (66.7%) and British patients (65%) and 4 for Italian patients (48.3%). The main presenting symptom was anaemia (18.7%) followed by malabsorption (10.5%), diarrhoea (9.3%) and dyspepsia (8.2%). Conclusion Taking less biopsy samples than recommended will have a negative impact in detecting massive number of undiagnosed cases. As CD is more common with atypical presentation, taking 4 duodenal biopsies is mandatory for an accurate diagnosis or its exclusion

Gastrointestinal and non-gastrointestinal presentation in patients with celiac disease.

Background: Celiac disease (CD) may have a variety of different presentations. This study has aimed to explore the prevalence of gastrointestinal (GI) and non-GI symptoms in patients with CD according to data collected in Italy and Romania (Europe) and Iran (Middle East). Methods: This is a retrospective cross-sectional study conducted in Iran, Romania and Italy with data collection during the period from May 2009 \u2013 May 2011. For each center we included only patients with CD that was con\ubfrmed by endoscopy, small bowel biopsies and positive serology. GI symptoms such as abdominal pain, diarrhea, constipation, nausea and vomiting, weight loss and \uc0atulence, as well as additional signs and symptoms of iron de\ubfciency anemia (IDA), osteoporosis, hypertransaminasemia, and other related abnormalities were collected. Results: Overall, 323 women and 127 men, whose mean age at diagnosis was 34.2 \ub1 16.47 years were included in this study. Of these, 157 subjects (34.9%) reported at least one GI symptom. The majority of cases had the following primary presenting GI symptoms: diarrhea (13.6%), dyspepsia and constipation (4.0%). Other disease symptoms were reported by 168 (37.3%) patients. The most presenting non-GI symptoms in the majority of cases were anemia (20.7%) and osteopenia (6%). There were statistically signi\ubfcant differences between the majority of symptoms when we compared the reported clinical symptoms from different countries. Conclusion: This study indicated that upper abdominal disorders such as abdominal pain and dyspepsia were the most common primary complaints among European patients, whereas Iranian patients had complaints of diarrhea and bloating as the classic presentations of CD. For non-GI symptoms, anemia was the most frequent complaint for both Iranian and Italian patients; however it was significantly higher in Iranians