44 research outputs found

    Adverse events during reoperative cardiac surgery: Frequency, characterization, and rescue

    Get PDF
    ObjectivesTo (1) determine frequency of occurrence and risk factors for intraoperative adverse events (IAE) during reoperative cardiac surgery, (2) characterize them with respect to structure injured, timing, and use of preventive strategies, and (3) identify the impact on outcome in terms of successful and unsuccessful rescue and cost.MethodsOperative notes of 1847 patients undergoing reoperative cardiac surgery were reviewed to identify and characterize documented intraoperative adverse events. Logistic regression modeling was used to identify risk factors for intraoperative adverse events and outcomes. Expected versus observed poor outcomes (stroke, myocardial infarction, death) was used to measure rescue.ResultsAmong 127 patients, 145 (7%) intraoperative adverse events occurred. These included injuries to bypass grafts (n = 47), heart (n = 38), and great vessels (n = 28) and ischemia without graft injury (n = 22). Most occurred on opening (n = 34, 23%) and during prebypass dissection (n = 57, 39%). Risk incremented as reoperations increased. Seventy-seven patients experienced 1 or more lapses in preventive strategies. Patients with intraoperative adverse events had a greater number of poor outcomes (n = 24 [19%] vs n = 107 [6.2%]; P < .0001) and incurred higher direct technical intraoperative and postoperative costs (ratio 1.3). Twelve patients with intraoperative adverse events were predicted to have poor outcomes versus 24 who did (P < .0001), indicating 12 “failures to rescue.”ConclusionsAdverse events still occur regularly during cardiac reoperation, are related to complexity of the procedure, and occur particularly during dissection and often when preventive strategies have not been used. Compensatory rescue measures are not always successful. Adverse events lead to poor patient outcome and higher cost

    Clostridium difficile infection after cardiac surgery: Prevalence, morbidity, mortality, and resource utilization

    Get PDF
    ObjectiveDespite increasing efforts to prevent infection, the prevalence of hospital-associated Clostridium difficile infections (CDI) is increasing. Heightened awareness prompted this study of the prevalence and morbidity associated with CDI after cardiac surgery.MethodsA total of 22,952 patients underwent cardiac surgery at Cleveland Clinic from January 2005 to January 2011. CDI was diagnosed by enzyme immunoassay for toxins and, more recently, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing. Hospital outcomes and long-term survival were compared with those of the remaining population in propensity-matched groups.ResultsOne hundred forty-five patients (0.63%) tested positive for CDI at a median of 9 days postoperatively, 135 by enzyme immunoassay and 11 by PCR. Its prevalence more than doubled over the study period. Seventy-seven patients (48%) were transfers from outside hospitals. Seventy-three patients (50%) were exposed preoperatively to antibiotics and 79 (56%) to proton-pump inhibitors. Patients with CDI had more baseline comorbidities, more reoperations, and received more blood products than patients who did not have CDI. Presenting symptoms included diarrhea (107; 75%), distended abdomen (48; 34%), and abdominal pain (27; 19%). All were treated with metronidazole or vancomycin. Sixteen patients (11%) died in hospital, including 5 of 10 who developed toxic colitis; 3 of 4 undergoing total colectomy survived. Among matched patients, those with CDI had more septicemia (P < .0001), renal failure (P = .0002), reoperations (P < .0001), prolonged postoperative ventilation (P < .0001), longer hospital stay (P < .0001), and lower 3-year survival, 52% versus 64% (P = .03), than patients who did not have CDI.ConclusionsAlthough rare, the prevalence of CDI is increasing, contributing importantly to morbidity and mortality after cardiac surgery. If toxic colitis develops, mortality is high, but colectomy may be lifesaving

    Pretransplant gastroesophageal reflux compromises early outcomes after lung transplantation

    Get PDF
    ObjectivesGastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is implicated as a risk factor for bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome after lung transplantation, but its effects on acute rejection, early allograft function, and survival are unclear. Therefore, we sought to systematically understand the time-related impact of pretransplant GERD on graft function (spirometry), mortality, and acute rejection early after lung transplantation.MethodsFrom January 2005 to July 2008, 215 patients underwent lung transplantation; 114 had preoperative pH testing, and 32 (28%) had objective evidence of GERD. Lung function was assessed by forced 1-second expiratory volume (FEV1; percent of predicted) in 97 patients, mortality by follow-up (median, 2.2 years), and acute rejection by transbronchial biopsy.ResultsPretransplant GERD was associated with decreased FEV1 early after lung transplantation (P = .01) such that by 18 months, FEV1 was 70% of predicted in double lung transplant patients with GERD versus 83% among non-GERD patients (P = .05). A similar decrease was observed in single lung transplantation (50% vs 60%, respectively; P = .09). GERD patients had lower survival early after transplant ( P = .02)—75% versus 90%. Presence of GERD did not affect acute rejection (P = .6).ConclusionsFor lung transplant recipients, pretransplant GERD is associated with worse early allograft function and survival, but not increased acute rejection. The compromise in lung function is substantial, such that FEV1 after double lung transplant in GERD patients approaches that of single lung transplant in non-GERD patients. We advocate thorough testing for GERD before lung transplantation; if identified, aggressive therapy early after transplant, including fundoplication, may prove efficacious

    Does right thoracotomy increase the risk of mitral valve reoperation?

    Get PDF
    ObjectiveThe study objective was to determine whether a right thoracotomy approach increases the risk of mitral valve reoperation.MethodsBetween January of 1993 and January of 2004, 2469 patients with mitral valve disease underwent 2570 reoperations (1508 replacements, 1062 repairs). The approach was median sternotomy in 2444 patients, right thoracotomy in 80 patients, and other in 46 patients. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with median sternotomy versus right thoracotomy, mitral valve repair versus replacement, hospital death, and stroke. Factors favoring median sternotomy (P < .03) included coronary artery bypass grafting (30% vs 2%), aortic valve replacement (39% vs 2%), tricuspid valve repair (27% vs 13%), fewer previous cardiac operations, more recent reoperation, and no prior left internal thoracic artery graft. These factors were used to construct a propensity score for risk-adjusting outcomes.ResultsHospital mortality was 6.7% (163/2444) for the median sternotomy approach and 6.3% (5/80) for the thoracotomy approach (P = .9). Risk factors (P < .04) included earlier surgery date, higher New York Heart Association class, emergency operation, multiple reoperations, and mitral valve replacement. Stroke occurred in 66 patients (2.7%) who underwent a median sternotomy and in 6 patients (7.5%) who underwent a thoracotomy (P = .006). Mitral valve replacement (vs repair) was more common in those receiving a thoracotomy (P < .04).ConclusionsCompared with median sternotomy, right thoracotomy is associated with a higher occurrence of stroke and less frequent mitral valve repair. Specific strategies for conducting the operation should be used to reduce the risk of stroke when right thoracotomy is used for mitral valve reoperation. In most instances, repeat median sternotomy, with its better exposure and greater latitude for concomitant procedures, is preferred

    The porcine bronchial artery: surgical and angiographic anatomy

    No full text
    The pig is often used in experimental studies on the significance of bronchial artery circulation, but the anatomy of this artery is only poorly described. The purpose of this study was to improve the anatomical basis for experimental studies on the porcine bronchial artery circulation. The origin of the artery from the aorta is described in 32 pigs. Heart–lung blocks were perfused with saline and removed in 16 pigs, and the broncho-oesophageal orifice was identified and cannulated. In these 16 specimens the intrapulmonary ramification was studied by angiography, and the extrapulmonary distribution and supply area by injection of Evans Blue. The broncho-oesophageal artery originated from the aorta as a single trunk in 91%. Angiography showed that each principal bronchus was accompanied by 2 bronchial artery branches far into the lung parenchyma. The central branching pattern of the artery between the aorta and the principal bronchi was divided into 3 subtypes. Evans Blue showed communication with the whole mediastinum. The anatomical relations are described. It is concluded that the broncho-oesophageal artery divides to follow each bronchus with 2 bronchial branches. A nomenclature for these branches is suggested. The pig anatomy is suited for experimental investigations on the bronchial circulation
    corecore