Insulin detemir: A new option for the treatment of diabetes

Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/73570/1/j.1745-7599.2007.00258.x.pd

Patient empowerment: the LIFE approach

In spite of the great strides that have been made in the treatment of diabetes, many patients do not achieve optimal outcomes. In an effort to address the gap between the promise and the reality of diabetes care, empowerment has been recognised as an effective patient-centred approach to diabetes care and education. A great deal of effort has been spent training healthcare professionals and developing patient education strategies within this framework. However, less effort has been spent helping patients to learn the lessons and acquire the skills needed to collaborate in the design of a workable diabetes care plan. This article outlines four fundamental lessons that need to be addressed as part of patient education and provides a simple approach called the LIFE plan to help patients truly take charge of their diabetes. Copyright © 2008 FENDPeer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/60963/1/114_ftp.pd

Evaluation of "Life with Diabetes" Patient Education Booklets

Evaluation of written patient education materials is a necessary part of pro viding education to pa tients with diabetes. Evaluation, however, is useful only if the needs of both those who use the materials (patients) and those who recommend and distribute the materials (health care professionals) are considered. Eight booklets in the "Life with Diabetes" patient educa tion series (developed by the Michigan Diabetes Research and Training Center) were evaluated by both health professionals and patients. Twenty-eight to 37 health professionals including nurses, dieti tians, and physicians evaluated each booklet. Their comments were used to revise and im prove the booklets before publication (formative or process evaluation).Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/69005/2/10.1177_014572178601200113.pd

Participation in a Diabetes Education and Care Program: Experience from the Diabetes Care for Older Adults Project

There is very little reported information concerning the participation of older adults in diabetes education and care programs, factors related to their attendance, and the influence of attendance on program outcomes. In this study, which was part of a larger study of insulin therapy, subjects (≥65 years old) assigned to the intensive management group (n=53) were provided with educational sessions during the 18-month study period. Data for this group were examined to determine factors that influenced enrollment and attendance. Attendance rates for individual participants averaged 72% during the first 6 months months and 68% during the subsequent 12 months. Demographic factors. baseline knowledge test scores, and baseline glycosylated hemoglobin levels did not significantly influence participation. Greater distance from the clinic and shorter time using insulin were significantly related (P=.05) to attendance. Perceived benefits of the program included diabetes education (45%), glucose control (23%), and interacting with others who have diabetes (23%).Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/68301/2/10.1177_014572179802400205.pd

Predictors of Adherence to Nutrition Recommendations in People With Non- Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus

The purpose of this study was to determine how the components of psychosocial adjustment to diabetes predict adherence to nutrition recommendations based on self-reported successful completion of contingency contracts. The relationships between the components of psychosocial adjustment and adherence to nutrition recommendations were examined in a convenience sample of patients with non-insulin- dependent diabetes mellitus participating in a contingency contracting intervention with nurses. Patients completed a standardized instrument, the Diabetes Care Profile, at the time they were enrolled into this randomized clinical trial. High and low levels of adherence to nutrition recommendations were identified by a median split of the number of contingency contracts completed for adherence to nutrition recommendations. Subjects who reported higher regimen adherence and a higher support ratio (received more diabetes-specific social support than desired) were significantly less likely to engage in contingency contracting for adherence to nutrition recommendations .Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/68967/2/10.1177_014572179702300206.pd

Guidelines for Facilitating a Patient Empowerment Program

The traditional medical treatment model often ignores the emotional, spiritual, social, and cognitive aspects of living with a chronic disease such as diabetes. Empowerment programs address these psychosocial areas by helping individuals develop skills and self-awareness in goal setting, problem solving, stress management, coping, social support, and motivation. Although many diabetes educators have been taught to use an empowerment curriculum to facilitate self-management, there is minimal research concerning the actual process of providing such programs to patients. We evaluated an empowerment curriculum (Empowerment: A Personal Path to Self-Care) with a diverse group of individuals with diabetes to determine the key elements of planning and implementing a successful diabetes patient empowerment program.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/68728/2/10.1177_014572179502100408.pd

Psychometric properties of the Swedish Diabetes Empowerment Scale

Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/73436/1/j.1471-6712.2007.00463.x.pd

Exploring the role of the patient–physician relationship on insulin adherence and clinical outcomes in type 2 diabetes: Insights from the MOSAIc study

BackgroundThe 2‐year prospective MOSAIc (Multinational Observational Study assessing Insulin use: understanding the challenges associated with progression of therapy) study is investigating whether patient‐, physician‐, and health system‐related factors affect outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). This baseline subanalysis investigated how aspects of the patient–physician relationship are associated with diabetes‐related distress, insulin adherence, and glycemic control.MethodsPatients with T2D taking insulin for ≥3 months were recruited at primary care and specialty practice sites in 18 countries. Physicians provided usual care. Clinical history and most recent HbA1c values were collected; patients were surveyed regarding their perception of physician interactions, diabetes‐related distress level, and insulin adherence.ResultsThe analysis population comprised 4341 patients. Four (of six) domains showed a significant relationship with total diabetes‐related distress (P < 0.01). Poor insulin adherence was associated with greater diabetes‐related distress (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06–1.22), higher Discrimination (aOR 1.13; 95% CI 1.02–1.27) and Hurried Communication (aOR 1.35; 95% CI 1.20–1.53) scores, and a lower Explained Results score (aOR 0.86; 95% CI 0.77–0.97). Poor insulin adherence was associated with a 0.43% increase in HbA1c, whereas a 1‐unit increase in total diabetes‐related distress and Hurried Communication scores was associated with a 0.171% and 0.145% increase in HbA1c, respectively.ConclusionsPatients distressed about living with T2D, and dissatisfied with aspects of their interactions with physicians, exhibited poor insulin adherence. Perceived physician inattention and lack of engagement (and diabetes‐related distress) directly affect insulin adherence and glycemic control.背景为期2年的前瞻性MOSAIc(Multinational Observational Study assessing Insulin use: understanding the challenges associated with progression of therapy,评估胰岛素使用情况的多国观察性研究:了解治疗进展带来的挑战)研究调查了患者‐、医生‐、医疗卫生系统‐相关因素是否会对2型糖尿病患者的临床结局产生影响。这项基线亚组分析调查了患者‐医生关系对糖尿病相关的不适、胰岛素依从性以及血糖控制可造成何种影响。方法在18个国家的初级保健以及专业医疗机构中招募胰岛素使用时间≥ 3个月的2型糖尿病患者。医生提供了常规的医疗护理。收集临床病史以及最近的HbA1c值;调查患者对医患之间关系的看法、与糖尿病相关的不适程度以及胰岛素依从性。结果分析人群包含了4341名患者。(在6个领域中)有4个方面与总的糖尿病相关不适之间具有显著的相关性(P < 0.01)。胰岛素依从性差与较高的糖尿病相关不适(校正过的优势比[aOR]为1.14;95%置信区间[CI]为1.06‐1.22)、较高的歧视(aOR为1.13;95% CI为1.02‐1.27)和仓促沟通(aOR为1.35;95% CI为1.20‐1.53)得分以及更低的解释病情得分(aOR为0.86;95% CI为0.77‐0.97)相关。胰岛素依从性差可导致HbA1c升高0.43%,然而总的糖尿病相关不适以及仓促沟通得分每增加1个单位就可以导致HbA1c分别升高0.171%与0.145%。结论患者感到苦恼的是2型糖尿病影响到了他们的生活,对于与医生的交流感到不够满意,而且表现为胰岛素依从性差。患者觉得医生不关心自己、缺乏交流(以及糖尿病本身造成的相关痛苦)会直接影响到胰岛素依从性以及血糖控制。HighlightsPatient perceptions of the quality of their interactions with their physicians have a significant association with total diabetes‐related distress. Diabetes‐related distress and patient–physician interactions have a significant independent association with insulin adherence and HbA1c level.This study delineates specific aspects of the patient–physician interaction that are linked to diabetes‐related distress, insulin adherence behavior, and glycemic control.Path analysis showing associations between patient–physician interactions, diabetes‐related distress, insulin adherence, and HbA1c level. The model is not adjusted for baseline covariates and shows only those factors with at least one significant interaction. Parameter coefficients in the path analysis are shown.Peer Reviewedhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/137500/1/jdb12443.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/137500/2/jdb12443_am.pd

The Diabetes Education Experience of Randomly Selected Patients Under the Care of Community Physicians

The purpose of this study was to describe the diabetes education and nutritional counseling received by patients under the active care of community physicians. The study population consisted of 440 patients with diabetes from the practices of 68 primary care physicians in eight Michigan communities. Fifty-eight percent of the sample reported having received diabetes education, and the mean number of years since the most recent education was 4.15 years. Sixty-six percent reported having seen a dietitian. Patients who had received diabetes education scored higher on a basic diabetes knowledge test (70% correct vs 60%) than patients who had not received diabetes education. From 1981 to 1991, a decline was observed in the percentage of patients who reported having received diabetes education (70% to 58%). Although patient education is an integral part of comprehensive diabetes care, too few patients are receiving it. Furthermore, diabetes education often results in less-than-optimal levels of knowledge. The situation has deteriorated over the past 10 years, and patients who are not on insulin typically are the least well served.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/68590/2/10.1177_014572179402000506.pd