13 research outputs found
Non-destructive depth analysis of the surface oxide layer on Mg2Si crystals with XPS and XAS
Depth analysis of the surface oxide layer on a Mg2Si crystal was performed with X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS). In XPS, X-rays from synchrotron radiation with the energies between 2100 and 3300 eV were used as the excitation sources for depth analysis. The Si 1s and Mg 1s XPS spectra show the formation of a thinner SiO2-X layer at outermost surface and a thicker MgO layer at lower surface on the Mg2Si. In XAS, total electron yield and partial electron yield (PEY) acquisition modes were used for the measurement of Si K-edge. The PEY spectrum was obtained by detecting electrons with a fixed kinetic energy of 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, or 50 eV. Although the PEY spectrum with electrons of 5 eV shows similar features with the total electron yield spectrum, detection of electrons with 50 eV gives an increase in the ratio of a peak at 1843.7 eV to the peak assigned to Mg2Si. The peak at 1843.7 eV can be assigned to the formation of SiO2-X on the Mg2Si. From XPS and XAS results, it is indicated that a thinner SiO2-X layer at outermost surface and a thicker MgO layer at lower surface are formed at initial oxidation of the Mg2Si
Mass-dependent isotopic fractionation of a solid tin under a strong gravitational field
Pure tin metals were centrifuged at 1106g
and at 220 °C for 100 hours, at 0.40106g at 220–230 °C
for 24 hours, and at 0.25106g
at 220 °C
for 24 hours. Their isotopic compositions were measured by a secondary ion mass
spectrometer (SIMS). 116Sn/120Sn
and 124Sn/120Sn
ratios of the 1.02106g sample
were considerably different than the initial compositions, and the magnitude of isotopic
fractionation reached 2.6±0.1%. A
three-isotope diagram of 116Sn/120Sn vs. 124Sn/120Sn
shows conclusively that isotopic fractionation caused by a gravitational field depended only on
the isotopic mass
Electronic structure of Li+@C60: Photoelectron spectroscopy of the Li+@C60[PF6−] salt and STM of the single Li+@C60 molecules on Cu(111)
We report the scanning tunneling microscope (STM) observation of the Li+ ion endohedral C60 on Cu(111), prepared by means of evaporation of a high-purity Li+@C60[PF6−] salt. The electronic state of Li+@C60 in the Li+@C60[PF6−] salt was also determined using photoemission and X-ray absorption spectroscopy, along with the density functional theory (DFT) calculations. In the salt, Li and PF6 had nearly single positive and negative charge, respectively; thus the C60 cage was practically neutral. The salt decomposed under ultra-high vacuum while heating at 400 °C. This allowed the selective deposition of Li+@C60 on Cu(111). Although secondary-ion mass spectroscopy of the deposited Li+@C60 film showed a decrease in the Li-content during evaporation, Li+@C60 was successfully identified using STM. The DFT calculations of Li+@C60 on Cu(111) suggested that the Li+ ion was singly charged and the location of the Li+ ion was displaced in an upward direction, which altered the local density of states in an upper section of C60, especially for LUMO+2. The calculated results were mostly in agreement with the bias-dependent STM and dI/dV images. However, an inconsistency was observed between the calculation and experiments in case of empty state imaging where tip-induced displacement of the Li+ ion may occur
Electronic structure of Li+@ C60: Photoelectron spectroscopy of the Li+@ C60 [PF6−] salt and STM of the single Li+@ C60 molecules on Cu (111)
We report the scanning tunneling microscope (STM) observation of the Li+ ion endohedral C60 on Cu(111), prepared by means of evaporation of a high-purity Li+@C60[PF6−] salt. The electronic state of Li+@C60 in the Li+@C60[PF6−] salt was also determined using photoemission and X-ray absorption spectroscopy, along with the density functional theory (DFT) calculations. In the salt, Li and PF6 had nearly single positive and negative charge, respectively; thus the C60 cage was practically neutral. The salt decomposed under ultra-high vacuum while heating at 400 °C. This allowed the selective deposition of Li+@C60 on Cu(111). Although secondary-ion mass spectroscopy of the deposited Li+@C60 film showed a decrease in the Li-content during evaporation, Li+@C60 was successfully identified using STM. The DFT calculations of Li+@C60 on Cu(111) suggested that the Li+ ion was singly charged and the location of the Li+ ion was displaced in an upward direction, which altered the local density of states in an upper section of C60, especially for LUMO+2. The calculated results were mostly in agreement with the bias-dependent STM and dI/dV images. However, an inconsistency was observed between the calculation and experiments in case of empty state imaging where tip-induced displacement of the Li+ ion may occur