25 research outputs found

    Review of current and planned activities of the International Space Weather Activity Team on Ionospheric Indices and Scales (ISWAT G2B-04)

    Get PDF
    Ionospheric indices have a high potential to support and contribute fulfilling user requirements in ground and space-based radio system applications such as HF communication, GNSS based safe navigation and precise positioning. Following the discussions at previous COSPAR assemblies, the International Space Weather Activity Team (ISWAT) G2B-04, established in 2021, encourage studies and test runs to specify the effectiveness of different types of ionospheric indices and scales. To fill the current gap in the NOAA SW scales in particular for trans-ionospheric radio system applications is one of the main tasks. Recently, the team has initiated a Coordinated Ionospheric Study on Scales and Indices (CISSI) to enable a comparison of the outcome of different index approaches based on almost identical data sets available at 4 different continental regions in two selected periods in 2015. Preliminary results were reported at recent ISWAT team meetings and are fortunately presented in this PSW.3 session too. Indeed, the team members are encouraged to closely collaborate, interact with customers groups, and present their results at international meetings and in journal publications. In this talk we review the current state and achievements of the ISWAT G2B-04 team activities and in particular, consider future tasks that should be addressed in this team including the contribution to the next COSPAR space weather road map. Key aspects of our future work are: ‱ Enhanced comparative analysis of different indices based on studies utilizing an identical data base. ‱ Identification of specific advantages and drawbacks of different indices focusing both on basic research and practical applications. These efforts are supported by the compilation of fact sheets for all available indices, suggested and discussed by the team members. ‱ Definition of an Ionospheric Scale applicable for a wide spectrum of applications in space-based radio systems in close collaboration with customers e.g. in precise positioning and safety of life navigation ‱ International collaboration in space weather monitoring, warning and forecasting as required, for example by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), and the need for a ‘common language’ in communication and data exchange. Therefore, definition and standardization of a practically-oriented scale designed for user-friendly space weather services are important tasks

    Report on recent and planned activies of the International Space Weather Action Team (ISWAT) on Ionospheric Indices and Scales

    Get PDF
    Ionospheric indices have a high potential to operate user requirements in ground and space-based radio system applications such as HF communication, GNSS based safe navigation and precise positioning. Considering the fact that the current NOAA space weather scales consider ionospheric impact on radio systems only for HF propagation (Radio blackout scale) there is a need to extend the SW scales for trans-ionospheric radio systems such as GNSS, intersatellite telecommunication and remote sensing radars. Following the discussions at previous COSPAR assemblies, the International Space Weather Activity Team (ISWAT) G2B-04 [1], established in 2021, encourage studies and test runs to specify the effectiveness of different types of ionospheric indices and scales to fill the gap in the SW scales in particular for trans-ionospheric radio system applications. Regularly organized online meetings enable intensive discussion on selected topics concerning ionospheric indices and scales and their use. Considering the growing capabilities of ionospheric measurements onboard satellites, the development of new indices and scales covering the entire globe without regional restrictions, typically for ground-based observations, are expected. To review the specification of current indices and scales to characterize the perturbation degree of the ionosphere for different applications, the team has started the elaboration and discussion of compact fact sheets for numerous indices currently used. The initiative intends to provide a quick orientation for young scientists and customers. Recently, the team has initiated a Coordinated Ionospheric Study on Scales and Indices (CISSI) to enable a comparison of the outcome of different index approaches based on identical data sets. Participants may contribute with studies on index approaches and/or related applications on their own choice on a best efforts basis. Participants may also contribute ground and/or space based GNSS data sets for creating a common database useable in the collaborative work. Besides the discussion at ISWAT meetings, the team members are encouraged to collaborate and present their results at international meetings and in journal publications. The present CISSI activity focuses on two periods from16-19 March 2015 (St. Patrick storm) and from 22-25 May 2015 (quiet reference). Predefined regions cover Europe, North- and South-America and Asia. The current data sets stored and hosted by data centers and research institutions in different countries contain ground based GNSS and vertical sounding data. This and further campaigns shall help to consolidate ionospheric space weather scales used in space weather services

    Impact of the altitudinal Joule heating distribution on the thermosphere

    Full text link
    Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/95601/1/jgra20978.pd

    Modelling of composition changes during F-region storms: a reassessment

    Full text link
    A recalculation of the global changes of thermospheric gas composition, resulting from strong heat inputs in the auroral ovals, shows that (contrary to some previous suggestions) widespread increases of mean molecular mass are produced at mid-latitudes, in summer and at equinox. Decreases of mean molecular mass occur at mid-latitudes in winter. Similar results are given by both the `UCL' and `NCAR TIGCM' three-dimensional models. The computed composition changes now seem consistent with the local time and seasonal response observed by satellites, and can broadly account for `negative storm effects' in the ionospheric F2-layer at mid-latitudes.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/29311/1/0000375.pd

    A comparison of wind observations of the upper thermosphere from the dynamics explorer satellite with the predictions of a global time-dependent model

    Full text link
    Seven polar passes of the NASA Dynamics Explorer 2 (DE-2) satellite during October and early December 1981 have been used to examine the high-latitude circulation in the upper thermosphere. Vector winds along the satellite track are derived by appropriate merging of the data from the remote-sensing Fabry-Perot interferometer (meridional wind) and the in situ wind and temperature spectrometer (zonal wind) and are compared with the predictions of a three-dimensional, time-dependent, global model of the thermosphere. Major features of the experimental winds, such as the mean day to night circulation caused by solar u.v. and e.u.v. heating, augmented by magnetospheric processes at high latitude and the sharp boundaries and flow reversals imposed on thermospheric winds by momentum transfer (ion drag) from the magnetosphere, are qualitatively explained by a version of the global model using a semi-empirical global model of polar electric fields (Volland Model 2 or Heppner Model A) and a model of global electron density which excludes the effects of high-latitude geomagnetic processes. A second version of the global dynamic model includes a theoretical model of the high-latitude ionosphere which is self-consistent and reflects the enhancement of ionization due to magnetospheric phenomena acting in addition to solar e.u.v. photo-ionization, including the interactive processes which occur between ionization and high latitude ion convection and thermospheric winds. This second dynamical model shows an improved comparison with the structure and magnitude of polar cap and auroral oval winds at times of other than extremely low geomagnetic activity, when the first model appears a better match. An improved empirical description of the complex magnetospheric processes exciting the thermosphere in the vicinity of the dayside polar cusp and an empirical description of storm-time electric fields will be required for a quantitative explanation of the polar thermospheric winds during geomagnetic substorm events.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/25079/1/0000510.pd

    The westward thermospheric jet-stream of the evening auroral oval

    Full text link
    One of the most consistent and often dramatic interactions between the high latitude ionosphere and the thermosphere occurs in the vicinity of the auroral oval in the afternoon and evening period. Ionospheric ions, convected sunward by the influence of the magnetospheric electric field, create a sunward jet-stream in the thermosphere, where wind speeds of up to 1 km s-1 can occur. This jet-stream is nearly always present in the middle and upper thermosphere (above 200 km altitude), even during periods of very low geomagnetic activity. However, the magnitude of the winds in the jet-stream, as well as its location and range in latitude, each depend on geomagnetic activity. On two occasions, jet-streams of extreme magnitude have been studied using simultaneous ground-based and satellite observations, probing both the latitudinal structure and the local time dependence. The observations have then been evaluated with the aid of simulations using a global, three-dimensional, time-dependent model of thermospheric dynamics including the effects of magnetospheric convection and particle precipitation. The extreme events, where sunward winds of above 800 ms-1 are generated at relatively low geomagnetic latitudes (60-70[deg]) require a greatly expanded auroral oval and large cross-polar cap electric field ( ~ 150 kV). These in turn are generated by a persistent strong Interplanetary Magnetic Field, with a large southward component. Global indices such as Kp are a relatively poor indicator of the magnitude and extent of the jet-stream winds.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/25724/1/0000281.pd

    A theoretical and empirical study of the response of the high latitude thermosphere to the sense of the "Y" component of the interplanetary magnetic field

    Full text link
    The strength and direction of the Interplanetary Magnetic Field (IMF) controls the transfer of solar wind momentum and energy to the high latitude thermosphere in a direct fashion. The sense of " Y" component of the IMF (BY) creates a significant asymmetry of the magnetospheric convection pattern as mapped onto the high latitude thermosphere and ionosphere. The resulting response of the polar thermospheric winds during periods when BY is either positive or negative is quite distinct, with pronounced changes in the relative strength of thermospheric winds in the dusk-dawn parts of the polar cap and in the dawn part of the auroral oval. In a study of four periods when there was a clear signature of BY, observed by the ISEE-3 satellite, with observations of polar winds and electric fields from the Dynamics Explorer-2 satellite and with wind observations by a ground-based Fabry-Perot interferometer located in Kiruna, Northern Sweden, it is possible to explain features of the high latitude thermospheric circulation using three dimensional global models including BY dependent, asymmetric, polar convection fields. Ground-based Fabry-Perot interferometers often observe anomalously low zonal wind velocities in the (Northern) dawn auroral oval during periods of extremely high geomagnetic activity when BY is positive. Conversely, for BY negative, there is an early transition from westward to southward and eastward winds in the evening auroral oval (excluding the effects of auroral substorms), and extremely large eastward (sunward) winds may be driven in the auroral oval after magnetic midnight. These observations are matched by the observation of strong anti-sunward polar-cap wind jets from the DE-2 satellite, on the dusk side with BY negative, and on the dawn side with BY positive.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/26311/1/0000396.pd

    Validation of Ionospheric Specifications During Geomagnetic Storms: TEC and foF2 During the 2013 March Storm Event

    Get PDF
    To address challenges of assessing space weather modeling capabilities, the CommunityCoordinated Modeling Center is leading a newly establishedInternational Forum for Space WeatherModeling Capabilities Assessment. This paper presents preliminary results of validation of modeled foF2 (F2 layer critical frequency) and TEC (total electron content) during the first selected 2013 March storm event (17 March 2013). In this study, we used eight ionospheric models ranging from empirical to physics-based, coupled ionosphere-thermosphere and data assimilation models. The quantities we considered are TEC and foF2 changes and percentage changes compared to quiet time background, and the maximum and minimum percentage changes. In addition, we considered normalized percentage changes of TEC. We compared the modeled quantities with ground-based observations of vertical Global Navigation SatelliteSystem TEC (provided by Massachusetts Institute of Technology Haystack Observatory) and foF2 data (provided by Global Ionospheric Radio Observatory) at the 12 locations selected in middle latitudes of the American and European-African longitude sectors. To quantitatively evaluate the models’ performance, we calculated skill scores including correlation coefficient, root-mean square error (RMSE), ratio of the modeled to observed maximum percentage changes (yield), and timing error. Our study indicates that average RMSEs of foF2range from about 1 MHz to 1.5 MHz. The average RMSEs of TEC are between ~5 and ~10 TECU (1 TEC Unit= 1016el/m2). dfoF2[%] RMSEs are between 15% and 25%, which is smaller than RMSE of dTEC[%] ranging from30% to 60%. The performance of the models varies with the location and metrics considered
    corecore