Differences in hub and spoke vascular units practice during the novel Coronavirus-19 (COVID-19) outbreak in Lombardy, Italy

To highlight clinical practice among referral (Hub, HH) or satellite (Spoke, SH) hospitals Vascular Surgery Units (VSUs) in Lombardy, during the COVID-19 pandemic "phase 1" period (March 8 - May 3, 2020)

Regional Survey in Lombardy, Northern Italy, on Vascular Surgery Intervention Outcomes During The COVID-19 Pandemic

The characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing vascular surgery hospitalised and managed in Lombardy are described with a comparison of patients tested positive for COVID-19 (CV19-pos) vs. those tested negative (CV19-neg)

Factors Affecting Patency of In Situ Saphenous Vein Bypass: Two Year Results from LIMBSAVE (Treatment of critical Limb Ischaemia with infragenicular Bypass adopting in situ SAphenous VEin technique) Registry

objective: the aim was to demonstrate contemporary outcomes of in situ saphenous vein bypass using a valvulotome.methods: analysis of two year outcomes of a multicentre registry based on the treatment of critical limb ischaemia with infragenicular bypass adopting in situ SAphenous VEin technique (LIMBSAVE). Between January 2018 and december 2019, 541 patients in 43 centres were enrolled. In all patients an innovative valvulotome was used. early outcomes were assessed. two year outcomes according to KaplaneMeier curves in terms of patency and limb salvage were evaluated. Associations between patient and procedure variables were analysed with univariable and multivariable analyses.results: In all cases, a valvulotome was able to lyse the valves. vein injury due to the in situ technique was 3.5%. Thirty day mortality and major amputation rates were 3% and 0.9%, respectively. Mean follow up was 12.1 months. Two year estimated primary patency, primary assisted patency, secondary patency, and limb salvage were 69.1%, 81.4%, 86.5%, and 94.5%, respectively. multivariable analysis showed an association between pre-operative vein diameter < 3 mm and lower primary patency (hazard ration [HR] 14.3, p <.001), primary assisted patency (HR 9.4, p = .002), secondary patency (HR 7.2, p =. 07), and limb salvage (HR 7.8, p = .005) rates. distal anastomosis to a tibial or foot vessel was also associated with lower primary patency (HR 4.8, p = .033), and primary assisted patency (HR 6, p = .011) rates. Use of a suprafascial tributary collateral as a graft was associated with lower primary patency (HR 6.7, p = .013), and primary assisted patency (HR 4.2, p = .042) rates.conclusion: vein diameter < 3 mm, distal anastomosis on a tibial or foot vessel, and use of a suprafascial tributary collateral as a graft were significantly associated with loss of patency and limb loss during follow up

Secondary endovascular procedures improve overall patency and limb salvage in patients undergoing in situ saphenous vein infragenicular bypass

Secondary interventions strongly improves patency and limb salvage rates in patients undergoing infrainguinal vein bypass. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of secondary endovascular procedures performed during the follow-up on patency and limb salvage in patients with critical limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) undergoing in situ saphenous vein infragenicular bypass

Secondary endovascular procedures improve overall patency and limb salvage in patients undergoing in situ saphenous vein infragenicular bypass

BACKGROUND: Secondary interventions strongly improves patency and limb salvage rates in patients undergoing infrainguinal vein bypass. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of secondary endovascular procedures performed during the follow-up on patency and limb salvage in patients with critical limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) undergoing in situ saphenous vein infragenicular bypass. METHODS: From January 2018 to December 2019 541 patients in 43 centers have been enrolled into the LIMBSAVE registry (treatment of critical Limb IschaeMia with infragenicular Bypass adopting in situ SAphenous VEin technique). In all patients a strict surveillance program with Duplex scan was established (1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 months). During the follow-up indications for endovascular procedures were anastomotic stenoses, improvement of run-in (iliac stenosis) or run-off (tibial vessels' stenoses or occlusions). Two-year estimated outcomes in terms of overall patency, and limb salvage were analyzed by life-table analysis (Kaplan-Meier test). Outcomes obtained in patients undergoing endovascular procedure (Group-endo) were compared by means of Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon Test with those obtained in patients with no secondary RESULTS: Two groups were homogeneous in terms of demographics and intraprocedural details. Overall mean duration of follow-up was 12.1 months (range 1-24). During the follow-up period (>30 days) 55 endovascular procedures were performed in 49 patients (9.1%) (Group-endo). Most of endovascular procedures (37/55, 67.3%) was performed to treat stenoses at proximal or distal anastomosis. Secondary endovascular procedures (40/55, 72.7%) were predominantly performed within 6 months from the index procedure. Estimated 2-year overall patency (97.9% vs. 85.2%, P=0.05), and limb salvage (100% vs. 93.9%, P=0.05) rates were significantly better in Group-endo. CONCLUSIONS: Secondary endovascular procedures in patients with CLTI undergoing in situ saphenous infragenicular bypass significantly improve the rates of overall patency and limb salvage in the mid-term period. improve overall patency and limb salvage in patients undergoing in situ saphenous vein infragenicular bypass. J Cardiovasc Surg 2023;64:430-6. DOI

Sex-Related Differences and Factors Associated with Peri-Procedural and 1 Year Mortality in Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia Patients from the CLIMATE Italian Registry

Background: Identifying sex-related differences/variables associated with 30 day/1 year mortality in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). Methods: Multicenter/retrospective/observational study. A database was sent to all the Italian vascular surgeries to collect all the patients operated on for CLTI in 2019. Acute lower-limb ischemia and neuropathic-diabetic foot are not included. Follow-up: One year. Data on demographics/comorbidities, treatments/outcomes, and 30 day/1 year mortality were investigated. Results: Information on 2399 cases (69.8% men) from 36/143 (25.2%) centers. Median (IQR) age: 73 (66-80) and 79 (71-85) years for men/women, respectively (p < 0.0001). Women were more likely to be over 75 (63.2% vs. 40.1%, p = 0.0001). More men smokers (73.7% vs. 42.2%, p < 0.0001), are on hemodialysis (10.1% vs. 6.7%, p = 0.006), affected by diabetes (61.9% vs. 52.8%, p < 0.0001), dyslipidemia (69.3% vs. 61.3%, p < 0.0001), hypertension (91.8% vs. 88.5%, p = 0.011), coronaropathy (43.9% vs. 29.4%, p < 0.0001), bronchopneumopathy (37.1% vs. 25.6%, p < 0.0001), underwent more open/hybrid surgeries (37.9% vs. 28.8%, p < 0.0001), and minor amputations (22% vs. 13.7%, p < 0.0001). More women underwent endovascular revascularizations (61.6% vs. 55.2%, p = 0.004), major amputations (9.6% vs. 6.9%, p = 0.024), and obtained limb-salvage if with limited gangrene (50.8% vs. 44.9%, p = 0.017). Age > 75 (HR = 3.63, p = 0.003) is associated with 30 day mortality. Age > 75 (HR = 2.14, p < 0.0001), nephropathy (HR = 1.54, p < 0.0001), coronaropathy (HR = 1.26, p = 0.036), and infection/necrosis of the foot (dry, HR = 1.42, p = 0.040; wet, HR = 2.04, p < 0.0001) are associated with 1 year mortality. No sex-linked difference in mortality statistics. Conclusion: Women exhibit fewer comorbidities but are struck by CLTI when over 75, a factor associated with short- and mid-term mortality, explaining why mortality does not statistically differ between the sexes

Comparison of long occlusive femoropopliteal de novo versus previous endovascularly treated lesions managed with in situ saphenous bypass

Background The aim of this study was to compare the 2-year outcomes of de novo versus postendovascular lesion treatment of femoropopliteal occlusions included in a national, multicenter, observational, prospective registry based on the treatment of critical Limb-threatening IschaeMia with infragenicular Bypass adopting in situ SAphenous VEin technique (LIMBSAVE) registry. Methods From January 2018 to December 2019, 541 patients from 43 centers have been enrolled in the LIMBSAVE registry. Of these patients, 460 were included in the present study: 341 (74.1%) with de novo lesions (DN group) and 119 (25.9%) with postendovascular treatment lesions (PE group). Initial outcome measures were assessed at 30 days after treatment. Furthermore, at the 2-year follow-up, the estimated outcomes of primary patency, primary-assisted patency, secondary patency, and limb salvage were analyzed with Kaplan-Meier curves and compared between groups with the log-rank test. Results Both groups were homogeneous in terms of demographic data, preoperative risk factors, and clinical presentation. However, compared with DN group, more patients in PE group had a great saphenous vein diameter of less than 3 mm (11.1% vs 21%; P = .007). Intraoperatively, both groups showed similar distal anastomosis sites: below-the-knee popliteal artery (63% DN group, 66.4% PE group) and tibial vessel (37% DN group, 33.6% PE group) (P = .3). The overall mean duration of follow-up was 11.6 months (range, 1-24 months). At the 2-year follow-up, there were no differences between the two groups in terms of primary patency (66.3% DN group vs 74.1% PE group; P = .9), primary-assisted patency (78.2% DN group vs 79.5% PE group; P = .2), secondary patency (85.1% DN group vs 91.4% PE group; P = .2), and limb salvage (95.2% DN group vs 95.1% PE group; P = .9). Conclusions The LIMBSAVE registry did not show a worsening of overall patency and limb salvages rates at the 2-year follow-up in patients undergoing in situ saphenous bypass after a failed endovascular approach for long femoropopliteal occlusive disease. This finding is in contrast with what has been published in literature

Insight from an Italian Delphi Consensus on EVAR feasibility outside the instruction for use: the SAFE EVAR Study

Background: The SAfety and FEasibility of standard EVAR outside the instruction for use (SAFE-EVAR) Study was designed to define the attitude of Italian vascular surgeons towards the use of standard endovascular repair (EVAR) for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) outside the instruction for use (IFU) through a Delphi consensus endorsed by the Italian Society of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery (Società Italiana di Chirurgia Vascolare ed Endovascolare - SICVE). Methods: A questionnaire consisting of 26 statements was developed, validated by an 18-member Advisory Board, and then sent to 600 Italian vascular surgeons. The Delphi process was structured in three subsequent rounds which took place between April and June 2023. In the first two rounds, respondents could indicate one of the following five degrees of agreement: 1) strongly agree; 2) partially agree; 3) neither agree nor disagree; 4) partially disagree; 5) strongly disagree; while in the third round only three different choices were proposed: 1) agree; 2) neither agree nor disagree; 3) disagree. We considered the consensus reached when ≥70% of respondents agreed on one of the options. After the conclusion of each round, a report describing the percentage distribution of the answers was sent to all the participants. Results: Two-hundred-forty-four (40.6%) Italian Vascular Surgeons agreed to participate the first round of the Delphi Consensus; the second and the third rounds of the Delphi collected 230 responders (94.3% of the first-round responders). Four statements (15.4%) reached a consensus in the first rounds. Among the 22 remaining statements, one more consensus (3.8%) was achieved in the second round. Finally, seven more statements (26.9%) reached a consensus in the simplified last round. Globally, a consensus was reached for almost half of the proposed statements (46.1%). Conclusions: The relatively low consensus rate obtained in this Delphi seems to confirm the discrepancy between Guideline recommendations and daily clinical practice. The data collected could represent the source for a possible guidelines' revision and the proposal of specific Good Practice Points in all those aspects with only little evidence available