A qualitative examination of apathy and physical activity in Huntington's and Parkinson's disease

Aim: In Huntington's disease (HD) and Parkinson's disease (PD), apathy is a frequently cited barrier to participation in physical activity. Current diagnostic criteria emphasize dissociable variants of apathy that differentially affect goal-directed behavior. How these dimensions present and affect physical activity in HD and PD is unknown. Methods: Using a qualitative approach, we examined the experience of apathy and its impact on physical activity in 20 people with early-manifest HD or idiopathic PD. Results: Two major themes emerged: the multidimensionality of apathy, including initiation or goal-identification difficulties, and the interplay of apathy and fatigue; and facilitators of physical activity, including routines, safe environments and education. Conclusion: Physical activity interventions tailored to apathy phenotypes may maximize participant engagement

Protocol of a feasibility study of a virtual personalized (N-of-1) trial for increasing low-intensity physical activity in older adults via habit formation

Background: Personalized interventions that can be delivered remotely are needed to increase physical activity (PA) in older adults to reduce risk of CV disease and mortality. Prior research indicates that Behavioral Change Techniques (BCTs) (e.g., goal setting, self-monitoring, behavioral repetition) can instill a habit for increasing daily walking. However, past interventions relied on between-subject randomized clinical trials, which can only only be informative about response of the hypothetical average person. Personalized trial designs can identify the benefits of an intervention for a specific individual although extended periods are required for collecting frequent measurements within-subject. Advances in remote, virtual technologies (e.g., text messaging, activity trackers), integrated with automatic platforms, can meet these requirements because they capacitate delivery of BCT interventions, and collection of data during daily life without personal contact. This Stage I-b trial is designed test whether a virtual, personalized intervention is feasible and acceptable to older adults, can elicit participant adherence and exhibit preliminary evidence for efficacy. Methods: A series of up to 60 single-arm, personalized trials, involving no personal contact, will recruit adults, 45–75 years of age, to wear an activity tracker during a 2-week baseline and a 10-week intervention. Five BCT prompts to execute a walking plan will be delivered on a daily basis during the intervention phase. Participants will rate satisfaction with personalized trial components and whether automaticity of the walking plan can be achieved. Step-counts, adherence to the walking plan and self-monitoring of step-count will also be recorded

Sedentary Behavior Research Network (SBRN) - Terminology Consensus Project process and outcome

Background: The prominence of sedentary behavior research in health science has grown rapidly. With this growth there is increasing urgency for clear, common and accepted terminology and definitions. Such standardization is difficult to achieve, especially across multi-disciplinary researchers, practitioners, and industries. The Sedentary Behavior Research Network (SBRN) undertook a Terminology Consensus Project to address this need. Method: First, a literature review was completed to identify key terms in sedentary behavior research. These key terms were then reviewed and modified by a Steering Committee formed by SBRN. Next, SBRN members were invited to contribute to this project and interested participants reviewed and provided feedback on the proposed list of terms and draft definitions through an online survey. Finally, a conceptual model and consensus definitions (including caveats and examples for all age groups and functional abilities) were finalized based on the feedback received from the 87 SBRN member participants who responded to the original invitation and survey. Results: Consensus definitions for the terms physical inactivity, stationary behavior, sedentary behavior, standing, screen time, non-screen-based sedentary time, sitting, reclining, lying, sedentary behavior pattern, as well as how the terms bouts, breaks, and interruptions should be used in this context are provided. Conclusion: It is hoped that the definitions resulting from this comprehensive, transparent, and broad-based participatory process will result in standardized terminology that is widely supported and adopted, thereby advancing future research, interventions, policies, and practices related to sedentary behaviors