Comparação do equilíbrio postural estático entre sujeitos saudavéis e lombálgicos Comparison of static postural balance between healthy subjects and those with low back pain

OBJETIVO: Comparar o equilíbrio postural estático entre portadoras de lombalgia crônica e indivíduos saudáveis, através do deslocamento do centro de pressão. MÉTODOS: Participaram do estudo 15 mulheres com lombalgia (Grupo lombalgia) e 15 mulheres saudáveis (Grupo saudável). Elas foram orientadas a permanecer em posição ortostática sobre a plataforma de força durante 30 segundos. Foram analisadas a área e a velocidade de deslocamento do centro de pressão de ambos os grupos. A análise dos dados foi realizada através do Teste t de Student, com significância de 5%. RESULTADOS: Os indivíduos com lombalgia crônica apresentaram maior área de deslocamento do centro de pressão em relação aos saudáveis, porém não houve diferença significativa em relação à velocidade de deslocamento do centro de pressão. CONCLUSÃO: Indivíduos com lombalgia crônica apresentam alteração do equilíbrio estático em relação a saudáveis. Nível de evidência III, Estudos Prognósticos.<br>OBJECTIVE: To compare the static postural balance between women suffering from chronic low back pain and healthy subjects, by moving the center of pressure. METHODS: The study included 15 women with low back pain (LBP group) and 15 healthy women (healthy group). They were instructed to remain in standing on the force platform for 30 seconds. We analyzed the area and the speed of displacement of center of pressure of both groups. Data analysis was performed using the Student t-test, with significance of 5%. RESULTS: Individuals with chronic low back pain showed a larger area of displacement of the center of pressure relative to the healthy ones but there was no significant difference in the speed of displacement of the center of pressure. CONCLUSION: Individuals with chronic low back pain had alterations in static balance with respect to healthy ones. Level of Evidence III, Prognostic Studies

A review on soil carbon accumulation due to the management change of major Brazilian agricultural activities

Agricultural areas deal with enormous CO2 intake fluxes offering an opportunity for greenhouse effect mitigation. In this work we studied the potential of soil carbon sequestration due to the management conversion in major agricultural activities in Brazil. Data from several studies indicate that in soybean/maize, and related rotation systems, a significant soil carbon sequestration was observed over the year of conversion from conventional to no-till practices, with a mean rate of 0.41 Mg C ha-1 year-1. The same effect was observed in sugarcane fields, but with a much higher accumulation of carbon in soil stocks, when sugarcane fields are converted from burned to mechanised based harvest, where large amounts of sugarcane residues remain on the soil surface (1.8 Mg C ha-1 year-1). The higher sequestration potential of sugarcane crops, when compared to the others, has a direct relation to the primary production of this crop. Nevertheless, much of this mitigation potential of soil carbon accumulation in sugarcane fields is lost once areas are reformed, or intensive tillage is applied. Pasture lands have shown soil carbon depletion once natural areas are converted to livestock use, while integration of those areas with agriculture use has shown an improvement in soil carbon stocks. Those works have shown that the main crop systems of Brazil have a huge mitigation potential, especially in soil carbon form, being an opportunity for future mitigation strategies