32 research outputs found

    Group activation differences, whole brain analysis: a) activations for the within-subjects contrast <i>self > other</i>.

    No full text
    <p>b) Activations for the between-subjects contrast <i>no-threat > self-threat</i> (negative feedback on the intelligence test result) c) Activations for the between-subjects contrast <i>positive traits > negative traits</i> (self-reference only). All activations are shown for a threshold of <i>p</i> < 0.001 uncorrected, reporting only clusters that have <i>p</i> < 0.05 corrected on cluster level.</p

    Demographics of the threat vs. no-threat group who evaluated either self-positive/other-negative or self-negative/other positive traits.

    No full text
    <p>Demographics of the threat vs. no-threat group who evaluated either self-positive/other-negative or self-negative/other positive traits.</p

    Correlation between values of <i>D<sub>b</sub></i>, <i>D<sub>m</sub></i>, <i>D<sub>0</sub></i>, <i>D<sub>1</sub></i>, and <i>D<sub>2</sub></i> and the nidus size evaluated from X-ray angiography data.

    No full text
    <p>Correlation between values of <i>D<sub>b</sub></i>, <i>D<sub>m</sub></i>, <i>D<sub>0</sub></i>, <i>D<sub>1</sub></i>, and <i>D<sub>2</sub></i> and the nidus size evaluated from X-ray angiography data.</p

    Mean values and standard error mean of <i>D<sub>b</sub></i> and <i>D<sub>m</sub></i> for statistical fractals obtained by DLA.

    No full text
    <p>On the left side of the figure fractals with an image matrix size of 512×512 pixels and 256×512 pixels for the image halves were analyzed. On the right side of the figure fractal analysis based on image matrix size of 364×436 pixels and 182×436 pixels for the image halves showing significant differences in <i>D<sub>b</sub></i> due to image matrix size. Asterisks indicate significant differences in group comparisons: * p<0.05, ** p<0.01.</p

    Means of Trait self-esteem sum scores of the four participant groups.

    No full text
    <p>Mean trait self-esteem sum scores were gained from the Rosenberg scale.</p><p>Sums were calculated over the items of the scale. There were no significant differences.</p><p>Means of Trait self-esteem sum scores of the four participant groups.</p

    Scatter plot of the significant correlation between the log-transformed reaction times of the negative self-related traits and trait self-esteem under self-threat.

    No full text
    <p>Scatter plot of the significant correlation between the log-transformed reaction times of the negative self-related traits and trait self-esteem under self-threat.</p

    Mean values of <i>D<sub>b</sub></i> and <i>D<sub>m</sub></i> for the patients’ hemispheres with AVM (P<sub>AVM</sub>), hemispheres without AVM (P<sub>no AVM</sub>) and the entire brain (P<sub>total</sub>).

    No full text
    <p>Mean values of <i>D<sub>b</sub></i> and <i>D<sub>m</sub></i> for healthy controls including the left and right hemispheres (HC<sub>left</sub>, HC<sub>right</sub>) and the entire brain (HC<sub>total</sub>). Mean values of <i>D<sub>b</sub></i> and <i>D<sub>m</sub></i> are presented for ten statistical fractals obtained by DLA for images different image matrix sizes. Values are as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM).</p
    corecore