29 research outputs found

    Mean (± SE, <i>n</i> = 4) log ratio observed/expected number of animal species in mixed algal assemblages (ET, EC and TC) and fragmentation (low, intermediate or high).

    No full text
    <p>Mean (± SE, <i>n</i> = 4) log ratio observed/expected number of animal species in mixed algal assemblages (ET, EC and TC) and fragmentation (low, intermediate or high).</p

    nMDS ordination of centroids of assemblages in patches of different algal assemblages and fragmentation, using <i>n</i> = 4 patches of each combination.

    No full text
    <p>Letters indicate algal assemblages (E, T, C, ET, EC, TC). Numbers indicate the treatment: 1 is low; 2 is intermediate; 3 is high. Data were ln (X+1) transformed.</p

    Analysis of variance of number of species, number of species standardized by per algal biomass; and numbers of individuals in experimental patches.

    No full text
    <p>* = <i>P</i> < 0.05</p><p>*** = <i>P</i> < 0.001</p><p>Assemblage is the fixed comparison with three levels: a) monotypic assemblages (E, T, C) or b) (ET, EC and TC). Fragmentation is a fixed comparison with three levels (low, intermediate and high). Pairwise comparisons (SNK tests) for the three assemblage types within each diversity level, means in brackets (<i>n</i> = 4); No. species / biomass and no. individuals were transformed using log(x+1).</p

    Mean (± SE, <i>n</i> = 4) numbers of species in patches with different algal assemblages (E, T, C, ET, EC, TC) and fragmentation (low, intermediate or high).

    No full text
    <p>Mean (± SE, <i>n</i> = 4) numbers of species in patches with different algal assemblages (E, T, C, ET, EC, TC) and fragmentation (low, intermediate or high).</p

    Analysis of variance of abundances of (a) gastropods and (b) amphipods in experimental patches. Assemblage is the fixed comparison with three levels: monotypic (E, T, C) or mixed (ET, EC and TC) assemblages.

    No full text
    <p>* = <i>P</i> < 0.05</p><p>** = <i>P</i> < 0.01</p><p>Fragmentation is a fixed comparison with three levels (low, intermediate or high). Significant factors compared with SNK at <i>P</i> < 0.05. (c) Means (<i>n</i> = 4) and SNK tests.</p

    Analysis of variance of log ratio between expected and observed number of species in different macroalgal assemblages (ET, EC, and TC) and fragmentation (low, intermediate and high).

    No full text
    <p>*** = <i>P</i> < 0.001.</p><p>Log ratio was calculated using the relative abundances of each macroalgal morphological groups in monotypic patches (see <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0142289#sec002" target="_blank">Methods</a> for details). Means and SNK tests are in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0142289#pone.0142289.g004" target="_blank">Fig 4</a>.</p

    Most abundant groups of benthic macroinvertebrates found in patches made of bare rock (clear bars), bare rock and crust (grey bars), bare rock and turf (striped bars), bare rock and canopy (black bars).

    No full text
    <p>Most abundant groups of benthic macroinvertebrates found in patches made of bare rock (clear bars), bare rock and crust (grey bars), bare rock and turf (striped bars), bare rock and canopy (black bars).</p

    Comparison of the magnitude of FD loss and regional species richness.

    No full text
    <p>One-way ANCOVA comparing the magnitude of the ratio between FD random and FD exploited for different levels of species removals (7, 15, 22 and 29 species removals) as a function of regional species richness (logged). All terms tested against the residual.</p
    corecore