23 research outputs found

    Multivariate risk factor analysis for animal tungiasis.

    No full text
    <p>Variables were analyzed by logistic regression and were eliminated stepwise to obtain an optimized model in terms of a minimal AIC value. Data are presented as odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. (A), (B) and (C) show risks factor analysis for the presence of tungiasis in a household in any animal species, pigs and dogs, respectively. *** p < 0.001; **, p < 0.01; *, p< 0.05. When confidence intervals were very wide, they were not plotted.</p

    Prevalence of human tungiasis in the animal rearing households.

    No full text
    <p><sup>a</sup>The prevalence of human tungiasis from the additional 57 goat owning households (from Makoma 1 and Masolya) was 48/382 (12.6% CI 9.6–16.3%)</p><p>Prevalence of human tungiasis in the animal rearing households.</p

    Age-specific prevalence of human tungiasis.

    No full text
    <p>Data with the same index letter (a, b, c) are not significantly different from each other in a Chi-square test with p values corrected for multiple testing according to the Bonferroni-Holm method.</p

    Proportions of households with animal tungiasis (at least one animal) according to host species in the 10 villages.

    No full text
    <p><sup>a</sup>Infected/sampled.</p><p><sup>b</sup>The numbers exclude additional households selected on the criteria of having at least one goat to avoid bias (see <a href="http://www.plosntds.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pntd.0004126#sec005" target="_blank">Materials and Methods</a>).</p><p><sup>c</sup>Not applicable.</p><p>Proportions of households with animal tungiasis (at least one animal) according to host species in the 10 villages.</p
    corecore