6 research outputs found

    Affects of exogenous Aβ<sub>1–42</sub> on the level of eNOS and autophagy in endothelial cells.

    No full text
    <p>Endothelial cells were treated with 5 µM and 10 µM Aβ<sub>1–42</sub> and incubated for 12 hrs. Protein levels of eNOS, nNOS, caveolin-1 and the autophagy marker LC3B were analyzed by Western blotting (A). (B), quantitation of protein levels of eNOS, nNOS and caveolin-1 normalized to β-actin control. Results are mean ± SD (n = 3–5). (C), quantitation of LC3B II/I ratio normalized to β-actin control. Results are mean ± SD (n = 3). **, P<0.01 compared to control.</p

    Aβ<sub>1–40</sub> expression monitored by immunofluorescence microscopy.

    No full text
    <p>Endothelial cells were incubated with different concentrations of fibrils for 12 hrs and processed as described in the <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0058194#s2" target="_blank">materials and method</a>. Phase contrast (left panels) and fluorescence images (right panel) were taken showing the same field.</p

    Detection of fibrillar Aβ<sub>1–42</sub> induced Aβ<sub>1–40</sub> production by flow cytometry.

    No full text
    <p>For the analysis of Aβ<sub>1–40</sub> synthesis in amyloidic condition, Hep-1 cells were treated with fibrillar Aβ<sub>1–42</sub> in the presence (A) or absence (B) of serum, stained with anti Aβ<sub>1–40</sub> antibodies (biotinylated) and streptavidin conjugated phycoerythrin. Histograms are shown for the control with no added amyloid (ctrl) and for cells incubated with various concentrations of Aβ<sub>1–42</sub>.as indicated in the figure.</p

    Fibrillar Aβ<sub>1–42</sub> induced APP upregulation in Hep-1 cells.

    No full text
    <p>Morphology of fibrillar Aβ<sub>1–42</sub> was confirmed by TEM (A).Cells were untreated or treated with 2 µM, 10 µM, 20 µM Aβ<sub>1–42</sub> for 24 hrs. Cell lysates were subjected to Western blot analysis using 8E5 antibody (B). The blot was quantitated by densitometric analysis (C). The fold increase of APP production compared to untreated control cells were shown as mean ± SD (n = 4). *, P<0.05; **, P<0.01 compared to control.</p
    corecore