Pre-operative chemoradiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer stage III patients. Feasibility, toxicity and long-term results of a phase II study

The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, the response rate and the effect on survival of full dose polychemotherapy delivered concurrently with bifractionated radiotherapy at a radical dose, in a subset of patients with marginally resectable or unresectable stage IIIA-B non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Treatment consisted of two courses of cisplatin 100 mg/m2 for 1 day plus etoposide 120 mg/m2 for 3 days delivered from day 1 to day 22, plus radiotherapy delivered in two cycles of 2560 cGy each from day 3 to day 12 and from day 24 to 33 (total dose 5120 cGy in 31 days). The daily dose was 320 cGy in two equal fractions. After surgery, three additional courses of cisplatin plus etoposide were planned. From February 1988 to June 1991, 39 patients with stage III NSCLC (19 were judged as having marginally resectable, 20 as having unresectable disease) were entered into the study. Out of 39 patients (22 squamous cell carcinoma, 17 adeno/large cell carcinoma), 24 had stage IIIa (62%) and 15 stage IIIb (38%). Median PS was 80 (70-90). A total of 78 (74 evaluable) concurrent cycles of pre-operative chemoradiotherapy were delivered. The prominent side-effect was leucopenia: leucopenia > or = grade 3 at nadir occurred in 20 cycles (27%), thrombocytopenia > or = grade 3 at nadir in seven cycles (9%), 19 patients (54%) had a treatment delay of 1 week between the two cycles. Other important toxicities were sepsis in 5 patients (13%), oesophagitis > grade 2 in 9 patients (23%) and pneumonitis in 5 patients (13%). The response rate was 67% (6 CR (complete response), 16%; 19 PR (partial response), 51%). A resection was subsequently performed in 20 (51%) patients: 14 out of 19 marginally resectable (74%) and 6 out 20 initially unresectable (30%) patients. One other patient had an exploratory thoracotomy. Surgical specimens were tumour-free in 3 patients (14%); in 8 patients (38%) only microscopic tumour was found, and in 10 (48%) macroscopic residual tumour was found. Out of 23 patients attaining a CR, 5 relapsed locally and 11 only distantly. At present, with a follow-up ranging from 64 to 90 months, 34 patients have died, 1 is alive with recurrent disease and 4 (17%) are alive without evidence of disease. Median survival was 16 months, with 18% 3-year survivors and 13% 5-year survivors. Resected patients had a median survival of 21 months, versus 10 months for unresected patients (P = 0.01). No significant difference was evident between stage IIIa and stage IIIb patients

LKB1 expression correlates with increased survival in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and bevacizumab

LKB1 is a key sensor of metabolic stress, including hypoxia and glucose deprivation, two features of the tumor microenvironment exacerbated by antiangiogenic therapy. We investigated the role of LKB1 as potential predictive marker of sensitivity to bevacizumab in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC)

From Diagnostic-Therapeutic Pathways to Real-World Data: A Multicenter Prospective Study on Upfront Treatment for EGFR-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (MOST Study)

Introduction: Gefitinib, erlotinib, and afatinib represent the approved first-line options for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Because pivotal trials frequently lack external validity, real-world data may help to depict the diagnostic-therapeutic pathway and treatment outcome in clinical practice. Methods: MOST is a multicenter observational study promoted by the Veneto Oncology Network, aiming at monitoring the diagnostic-therapeutic pathway of patients with nonsquamous EGFR-mutant NSCLC. We reported treatment outcome in terms of median time to treatment failure (mTTF) and assessed the impact of each agent on the expense of the regional health system, comparing it with a prediction based on the pivotal trials. Results: An EGFR mutation test was performed in 447 enrolled patients, of whom 124 had EGFR mutation and who received gefitinib (n = 69, 55%), erlotinib (n = 33, 27%), or afatinib (n = 22, 18%) as first-line treatment. Because erlotinib was administered within a clinical trial to 15 patients, final analysis was limited to 109 patients. mTTF was 15.3 months, regardless of the type of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) used. In the MOST study, the budget impact analysis showed a total expense of \u20ac3,238,602.17, whereas the cost estimation according to median progression-free survival from pivotal phase III trials was \u20ac1,813,557.88. Conclusion: Good regional adherence and compliance to the diagnostic-therapeutic pathway defined for patients with nonsquamous NSCLC was shown. mTTF did not significantly differ among the three targeted TKIs. Our budget impact analysis suggests the potential application of real-world data in the process of drug price negotiation. Implications for practice: The MOST study is a real-world data collection reporting a multicenter adherence and compliance to diagnostic-therapeutic pathways defined for patients with epidermal growth factor receptor-mutant non-small cell lung cancer. This represents an essential element of evidence-based medicine, providing information on patients and situations that may be challenging to assess using only data from randomized controlled trials, e.g., turn-around time of diagnostic tests, treatment compliance and persistence, guideline adherence, challenging-to-treat populations, drug safety, comparative effectiveness, and cost effectiveness. This study may be of interest to various stakeholders (patients, clinicians, and payers), providing a meaningful picture of the value of a given therapy in routine clinical practice