Time to complete the chair stand test (s) according to age groups and physical activity status.

<p>Physical performance, as assessed by the chair stand test, was similar from 18 to 40–44 years, and declined thereafter. Physically active participants showed better performance than sedentary people. Active 80+ participants showed the same performance of sedentary 65-year-old persons.</p

Characteristics of the study population according to physical activity^*.

<p>Characteristics of the study population according to physical activity^{<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0191820#t001fn001" target="_blank">*</a>}.</p

Unadjusted and adjusted association [odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs)] between types of physical activity and better performance on the chair stand test (lower than median value).

<p>Unadjusted and adjusted association [odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs)] between types of physical activity and better performance on the chair stand test (lower than median value).</p

Inappropriate drug use according to Cognitive Performance Scale (CPS) score.

<p>Inappropriate drug use according to Cognitive Performance Scale (CPS) score.</p

Sample characteristics according to inappropriate drug use.

<p>ADL – Activities of Daily Living.</p>*<p>includes drugs defined as never or rarely appropriate based on Holmes criteria.</p>†<p>any hospitalization occurring in the last 90 days before assessment.</p

Additional file 1: of Short Physical Performance Battery and all-cause mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis

Short Physical Performance Battery and all-cause Mortality: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. eTable 1. New-Castle Ottawa Scale for quality assessment. eTable 2. Source for follow-up of all the studies included in the meta-analysis. eTable 3. Meta-regression analyses considering population characteristics of each study included in the meta-analysis. eTable 4. Assessment of publication bias. eTable 5. PRISMA checklist. eFigure 1. Funnel plot and Trim and Fill analysis. A. Relation between SPPB 0-3 vs 10-12 and all-cause mortality. B. Relation between SPPB 4-6 vs 10-12 and all-cause mortality. C. Relation between SPPB 7-9 vs 10-12 and all-cause mortality. eFigure 2. Scatter Plot of meta-regression analysis for female sex, diabetes mellitus and age and relation between SPPB 7-9 vs 10-12 and all-cause death. (DOCX 146 kb