8 research outputs found
A retrospective cohort study confirms that prophylactic vaccination is underutilized in patients on tumor necrosis factor inhibitors
Recommended from our members
A unique case of concurrent cutaneous lichen amyloidosis and myxedema
Lichen amyloidosis is believed to be caused by damage to keratinocytes, often by chronic scratching. It has also been associated with autoimmune conditions, including thyroid disease. Dermatologic manifestations of poorly controlled thyroid disease are well described within the medical literature, within both hypothyroid and hyperthyroid states. Myxedema is a rare complication of Graves disease. We report a unique case of concurrent myxedema and lichen amyloidosis in a 63-year-old patient with uncontrolled hypothyroidism in the setting of post-ablative Graves disease
Suppression of pathergy in pyoderma gangrenosum with infliximab allowing for successful tendon debridement
Localized cutaneous sclerodermoid changes secondary to human cytomegalovirus infection: An uncommon presentation in an immunocompetent host
Lentigines in resolving psoriatic plaques: rarely reported sequelae in pediatric cases.
Lentigo formation has been described in adults after the resolution of psoriatic plaques treated with various standard psoriasis treatments. We describe three cases of lentigines developing in areas of resolving psoriatic plaques: two in patients treated with etanercept and one before starting etanercept. A possible pathomechanism is proposed
Higher Odds of Adverse Cutaneous Reactions in Patients With Dermatomyositis Treated With Hydroxychloroquine Compared With Methotrexate
Objective Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) use for the treatment of dermatomyositis (DM) has been associated with adverse cutaneous reactions. We applied a new user, active comparator, retrospective design to assess differences in adverse cutaneous reactions or hospitalizations between HCQ and methotrexate (MTX) use among patients with DM. Methods We used a national network of data from insurance registries (TriNetX), enrolling patients with two International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes for DM separated by 6 months or more who had a prescription for either (but not both) HCQ or MTX on or after DM diagnosis. Outcomes were adverse cutaneous reactions (ICD codes) or hospital admission (Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes) within 4 months from the prescription dispense date. Logistic regression was used to produce adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) comparing outcomes in the HCQ group (n = 1364) and the MTX group (n = 1400), adjusted for age at first DM diagnosis, year of birth, sex, and time from DM diagnosis to first prescription. Results Overall, we found no significant difference in odds of hospitalization in those taking HCQ (aOR 1.05; 95% CI: 0.79â1.39) compared with those on MTX. Patients with DM on HCQ had 30% higher odds of adverse cutaneous reaction diagnosis compared with patients on MTX (aOR 1.30; 95% CI: 1.02â1.59). Age at DM diagnosis was an effect modifier of this association, with higher odds of adverse cutaneous reaction among patients taking HCQ who were younger at diagnosis. Conclusion Compared with MTX use, HCQ use, especially in younger patients, may result in higher odds of adverse cutaneous reactions