Repeated percutaneous hepatic perfusion with melphalan can maintain long-term response in patients with liver cancers

Chemosaturation (CS; CHEMOSAT®, Delcath Systems Inc.) temporarily administers melphalan into the liver by percutaneous hepatic perfusion (PHP). CS-PHP can effectively control growth in liver tumors, but efficacy and tolerability of sequential treatments are unclear. We analyzed outcomes of sequential CS-PHP treatment. Patients with either unresectable intrahepatic metastases of ocular melanoma (OM, n = 9), cholangiocarcinoma (CCA, n = 3), or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC, n = 1) were recruited retrospectively. Response was assessed by tomography imaging. Ten patients (mean age 60 years) with more than one CS-PHP treatment were included. CS-PHP was administered 2-6 times in the OM patients, 3 times in the CCA, and the HCC patient received 6 treatments. Overall response rate (ORR) to CS-PHP was 80%, and stable disease was achieved in one patient. Median hepatic progression-free survival (hPFS) was 336 days (range 0-354) for OM, 251 days for the CCA patient, and 256 days for the HCC patient. At the end of observation (153-701 days after first CS-PHP), 6/10 patients were still alive (5/9 with OM, 0 with CCA, and 1 with HCC). Death cases were not related to CS-PHP. Adverse events were mostly hematologic, grade I-IV, and self-resolving. The liver function was not deteriorated by CS-PHP. We conclude that repeated CS-PHP treatments were effective and well tolerated in the long term

Dickkopf-Related Protein 1 as Response Marker for Transarterial Chemoembolization of Hepatocellular Carcinomas

Background and Aims: In the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), response prediction to transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) based on serum biomarkers is not established. We have studied the association of circulating Dickkopf-related protein 1 (DKK-1) with baseline characteristics and response to TACE in European HCC patients. Methods: Patients with HCC treated with TACE from 2010 to 2018 at a tertiary referral hospital were retrospectively enrolled. Levels of DKK-1 were measured in serum samples collected before TACE. Response was assessed according to mRECIST criteria at week 12 after TACE. Results: Ninety-seven patients were enrolled, including seventy-nine responders and eighteen refractory. Before TACE, median DKK-1 serum levels were 922 [range, 199–4514] pg/mL. DKK-1 levels were lower in patients with liver cirrhosis (p = 0.002) and showed a strong correlation with total radiologic tumor size (r = 0.593; p < 0.001) and with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stages (p = 0.032). Median DKK-1 levels were significantly higher in refractory patients as compared to responders (1471 pg/mL [range, 546–2492 pg/mL] versus 837 pg/mL [range, 199–4515 pg/mL]; p < 0.001), and DKK-1 could better identify responders than AFP (AUC = 0.798 vs. AUC = 0.679; p < 0.001). A DKK-1 cutoff of ≤1150 pg/mL was defined to identify responders to TACE with a sensitivity of 78% and specificity of 77%. DKK-1 levels were suitable to determine response to TACE in patients with low AFP serum levels (AFP levels < 20 ng/mL; AUC = 0.843; 95% CI [0.721–0.965]; p = 0.003). Conclusion: DKK-1 levels in serum are strongly associated tumor size and with response to TACE in European HCC patients, including those patients with low AFP levels

Protroca: A Noninterventional Study on Prophylactic Lipegfilgrastim against Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia in Nonselected Breast Cancer Patients

Background: Protroca evaluated the efficacy and safety of primary and secondary prophylaxis of neutropenia with lipegfilgrastim (Lonquex (R)) in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy (CT). Patients and Methods: Of the 255 patients enrolled, 248 patients were evaluable for the intent-to-treat (ITT) and 194 patients for the per-protocol set. Primary and secondary end points after lipegfilgrastim treatment were assessed. Results: Nine patients of the ITT set receiving lipegfilgrastim as primary prophylaxis (n = 222) had febrile neutropenia of grade 3-4 (5 patients) or infection of grade 3-4 (4 patients); 1/26 of those receiving secondary prophylaxis had an event. Dose reductions were performed in 9.5% of the patients. Postponement of cancer CT cycles for >3 days occurred in <15% of patients; 10.8% (92/851 AEs) and 8% (2/25 SAEs) of documented adverse events and serious adverse events, respectively, were related to lipegfilgrastim. Conclusions: Application of lipegfilgrastim was effective as primary and secondary prophylaxis in the prevention of CT-induced neutropenia in breast cancer

Overall survival in the OlympiA phase III trial of adjuvant olaparib in patients with germline pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2 and high-risk, early breast cancer

International audienc