Assessing the painful, uninflamed eye in primary care

We acknowledge the important contributions of Professor Amada J Lee, University of Aberdeen, Division of Statistics, for assistance with analysing the data from the patient survey. We thank Kamran Khan, Oliver Chadwick, and Paul Chua, trainee ophthalmologists, NHS Grampian, for providing the clinical images. Contributors: LK contributed to the design of the study, the survey of patients, and writing the paper. JVF contributed to the design of the study and writing the paper. ADD contributed to the design of the study, the survey of the patients, and writing the paper. JVF is guarantor for the paper.Peer reviewedPublisher PD

Improved Partnership Working for Local Authority Transport Planning

Diverse perspectives need to be brought together to facilitate the organisational delivery of more sustainable transport plans and policies. This necessitates close-working partnerships and good cross-sector learning. This paper looks at the rationales for design of, and anticipated roles for, two tools to assist this process: one a guide to cross-sector and intra-organisational partnership working written specifically for local authority transport practitioners; and the other an online framework within which practitioners can better identify and utilise other products from the research programme. Whilst grounded in UK research and experience, the lessons learned are generic to the European context. The paper also investigates the success of DISTILLATE’s own interdisciplinary approach and relates this to the literature, in particularly to the idea of ‘double loop learning’ by which individuals and organisations (research and practitioner) can acquire the new knowledge necessary to make the step-change towards more sustainable transport systems and practices. This is followed by a discussion of the implications of this for supporting decision-making more widely in the field of transport and infrastructure

»A sort of devil« (Keynes on Freud, 1925): Reflections on a century of Freud-criticism

Controversies over the validity, scientific status and cultural significance of psychoanalysis have continued unabated since its foundation at the beginning of the twentieth century. This paper will focus on one debate, which took place in England in the mid 1920s, so as to give historical specificity to a striking example of a seemingly perennial conflict. Amongst the protagonists were John Maynard Keynes, economist and world banker, and Arthur Tansley, founder of British ecology. Through examining the controversy, the manner in which psychoanalysis was articulated with other fields for these thinkers will be explored, including the psychological foundations for Keynesian economics.Controversies over the validity, scientific status and cultural significance of psychoanalysis have continued unabated since its foundation at the beginning of the twentieth century. This paper will focus on one debate, which took place in England in the mid 1920s, so as to give historical specificity to a striking example of a seemingly perennial conflict. Amongst the protagonists were John Maynard Keynes, economist and world banker, and Arthur Tansley, founder of British ecology. Through examining the controversy, the manner in which psychoanalysis was articulated with other fields for these thinkers will be explored, including the psychological foundations for Keynesian economics

Autoimmunity, Autoinflammation, and Infection in Uveitis

Funding/Support: No funding or grant support. Financial Disclosures: John V. Forrester has received an honorarium for lecturing from Janssen (London, UK). Lucia Kuffova has undertaken consultancy work for Abbvie (London, UK). Andrew D. Dick has undertaken consultancy work for Abbvie (London, UK), Roche (London, UK), and Genentech (London, UK) and has received honoraria from Janssen (London, UK) and Abbvie (London, UK). The authors attest that they meet the current ICMJE criteria for authorship.Peer reviewedPublisher PD