28 research outputs found

    Diminished proportions of HLA-G<sup>+</sup> CD4 and CD8 T cells in progressive HIV-1 infection.

    No full text
    <p>(A): Representative flow cytometry dot plots reflecting the proportions of HLA-G<sup>+</sup> CD4 and CD8 T cells in indicated study subjects. FMO control reflects ā€œfluorescence minus oneā€ control condition without addition of HLA-G antibodies. (B): Box and Whisker plots summarizing the relative proportions and absolute numbers of HLA-G<sup>+</sup> CD4 and CD8 T cells in indicated study cohorts. ANOVA followed by post-hoc analysis with Tukey's Multiple Comparison Test was used to determine significance. (C): Correlations between frequencies of HLA-G<sup>+</sup> T cells and total CD4 T cell counts in controllers (nā€Š=ā€Š23), progressors (nā€Š=ā€Š27) and HIV seronegative individuals (nā€Š=ā€Š15). (D): Correlations between proportions of HLA-G<sup>+</sup> Treg and CD8 T cell immune activation determined by surface expression of CD38 and HLA-DR in controllers (nā€Š=ā€Š19), progressors (nā€Š=ā€Š20), and HIV seronegative individuals (nā€Š=ā€Š15). (C/D): Spearman's correlation coefficient is shown.</p

    HLA-G<sup>+</sup> Treg reduce bystander activation of T cells.

    No full text
    <p>(Aā€“B): Representative flow cytometry dot plots reflecting the surface expression of CD38 on VĪ²13.1<sup>+</sup> and VĪ²13.1<sup>āˆ’</sup> responder T cells following exposure to indicated CD4 (A) or CD8 (B) Treg cell populations or negative control CD4 or CD8 T cells from HIV-seronegative donors. (Cā€“D): Cumulative data representing relative suppression of CD38, HLA-DR and CD69 on VĪ²13.1<sup>+</sup> and VĪ²13.1<sup>āˆ’</sup> responder T cells following exposure to indicated CD4 (C) or CD8 (D) Treg cell populations. Mean and standard deviation from nā€Š=ā€Š8 HIV-1 negative study subjects are shown. Significance was tested by paired T test.</p

    Stable LILRB1 expression on T cells after ā€œbystander activationā€.

    No full text
    <p>(A) Representative dot plots demonstrating proportions of LILRB1-expressing VĪ²13.1<sup>+</sup> and VĪ²13.1<sup>āˆ’</sup> T cells after activation with SEB over indicated time course. (B): Fold change of LILRB1 expression on VĪ²13.1<sup>+</sup> or VĪ²13.1<sup>āˆ’</sup> T cells at indicated time points. Mean and standard error from 7 different HIV-1 negative donors are shown. Significance was tested by paired T test.</p

    HLA-G<sup>+</sup> Treg minimally inhibit proliferative activities of antigen-specific T cells.

    No full text
    <p>(Aā€“B): Representative dot plots reflecting proliferative activities of HIV-1-, CMV-, or PHA-stimulated CD4 (A) or CD8 (B) T cells from HIV controllers following incubation with indicated autologous Treg subsets or HLA-G<sup>āˆ’</sup> CD25<sup>āˆ’</sup> control cells. (Cā€“D): Cumulative data reflecting the Treg-mediated suppression of HIV-1-specific CD4 (C) or CD8 (D) T cell proliferation from nā€Š=ā€Š3 HIV-1 controllers. Significance was tested by paired T test.</p

    Increased detection of Gag p24 specific responses using a 10 mer peptide set.

    No full text
    <p>IFN-Ī³ ELISpot responses against Gag p24 elicited either by consensus B overlapping 18 mer or COT-M 10 mer peptide sets in 25 HIV-1 controllers (<b>A</b>) and 25 HIV-1 non-controllers (<b>B</b>) P-values reflect the increase in median breadth of responses when using 10 mer peptide sets instead the 18 mer peptides (two-tailed Wilcoxon matched paired test). Total magnitude of responses (<b>C</b>) and average magnitude of responses (<b>D</b>) to COT-M Gag p24 10 mer peptides are shown for 25 controllers and 25 non-controllers, respectively. Lines represent median values and indicated p values are based on Mann-Whitney t-tests.</p

    High avidity responses are enriched in HIV-1 controllers and mediate superior variant recognition.

    No full text
    <p>(<b>A</b>) Comparison of functional avidity of all COT-M Gag p24 responses titrated in controllers (nā€Š=ā€Š219 responses) vs. non-controllers (nā€Š=ā€Š255 responses) (<b>B</b>) Comparison of functional avidities limited to responses targeting the same 10 mer OLP in the two groups (nā€Š=ā€Š52 responses, Wilcoxon). In (<b>C</b>) the total breadth (number) of the response to the tested COT-M Gag p24 variant peptides (nā€Š=ā€Š88) is indicated for controllers and non-controllers. (<b>D</b>) Shows the percentage of variant peptides that were reactive when the COT-M sequence elicited a response (ā€œcross-reactive responsesā€) and (<b>E</b>) indicates responses to variant peptides for which the COT-M sequence did not elicit a response (ā€œgained responsesā€). The association between functional avidity and cross-reactivity is shown in (<b>F</b>) where responses with functional avidities in either the first quartile of all titrated responses (SD50%<1,401 ng/ml) or the second or third quartile (SD50% 1,401ā€“71,594 ng/ml) or the fourth quartile (SD50%>71,594 ng/ml) were defined as ā€œhighā€, ā€œintermediateā€ and lowā€ avidity responses. The percentage of variants that elicited a response was compared between the three groups (Fishers Exact Test).</p

    CE containing HLA-B14, -B27 and B57 restricted, protective CTL epitopes are predominantly targeted by HIV-1 controllers.

    No full text
    <p>(<b>A</b>) The total magnitude of responses to CE regions is compared between HIV controllers and non-controllers. (<b>B</b>) The frequency of recognition of the 7 different CE is shown for 25 HIV-1 controllers (C) and 25 non-controllers (NC), respectively. CE regions targeted by at least 50% more controllers than non-controllers are boxed and p-values indicated (T test). (<b>C</b>) Breadth of responses to the combination of CE 4+5+6 regions in controllers vs. non-controllers is shown. Horizontal lines represent median values and Mann-Whitney t-test p value is shown. (<b>D</b>) Correlation between the cumulative magnitude of responses to CE 4+5+6 and HIV viral loads in all 50 tested individuals is shown (Spearman's rank test).</p
    corecore