8 research outputs found
The International Workshop on Osteoarthritis Imaging Knee MRI Segmentation Challenge: A Multi-Institute Evaluation and Analysis Framework on a Standardized Dataset
Purpose: To organize a knee MRI segmentation challenge for characterizing the
semantic and clinical efficacy of automatic segmentation methods relevant for
monitoring osteoarthritis progression.
Methods: A dataset partition consisting of 3D knee MRI from 88 subjects at
two timepoints with ground-truth articular (femoral, tibial, patellar)
cartilage and meniscus segmentations was standardized. Challenge submissions
and a majority-vote ensemble were evaluated using Dice score, average symmetric
surface distance, volumetric overlap error, and coefficient of variation on a
hold-out test set. Similarities in network segmentations were evaluated using
pairwise Dice correlations. Articular cartilage thickness was computed per-scan
and longitudinally. Correlation between thickness error and segmentation
metrics was measured using Pearson's coefficient. Two empirical upper bounds
for ensemble performance were computed using combinations of model outputs that
consolidated true positives and true negatives.
Results: Six teams (T1-T6) submitted entries for the challenge. No
significant differences were observed across all segmentation metrics for all
tissues (p=1.0) among the four top-performing networks (T2, T3, T4, T6). Dice
correlations between network pairs were high (>0.85). Per-scan thickness errors
were negligible among T1-T4 (p=0.99) and longitudinal changes showed minimal
bias (<0.03mm). Low correlations (<0.41) were observed between segmentation
metrics and thickness error. The majority-vote ensemble was comparable to top
performing networks (p=1.0). Empirical upper bound performances were similar
for both combinations (p=1.0).
Conclusion: Diverse networks learned to segment the knee similarly where high
segmentation accuracy did not correlate to cartilage thickness accuracy. Voting
ensembles did not outperform individual networks but may help regularize
individual models.Comment: Submitted to Radiology: Artificial Intelligence; Fixed typo
Learning osteoarthritis imaging biomarkers from bone surface spherical encoding
PurposeTo learn bone shape features from spherical bone map of knee MRI images using established convolutional neural networks (CNN) and use these features to diagnose and predict osteoarthritis (OA).MethodsA bone segmentation model was trained on 25 manually annotated 3D MRI volumes to segment the femur, tibia, and patella from 47 078 3D MRI volumes. Each bone segmentation was converted to a 3D point cloud and transformed into spherical coordinates. Different fusion strategies were performed to merge spherical maps obtained by each bone. A total of 41 822 merged spherical maps with corresponding Kellgren-Lawrence grades for radiographic OA were used to train a CNN classifier model to diagnose OA using bone shape learned features. Several OA Diagnosis models were tested and the weights for each trained model were transferred to the OA Incidence models. The OA incidence task consisted of predicting OA from a healthy scan within a range of eight time points, from 1 y to 8 y. The validation performance was compared and the test set performance was reported.ResultsThe OA Diagnosis model had an area-under-the-curve (AUC) of 0.905 on the test set with a sensitivity and specificity of 0.815 and 0.839. The OA Incidence models had an AUC ranging from 0.841 to 0.646 on the test set for the range from 1 y to 8 y.ConclusionBone shape was successfully used as a predictive imaging biomarker for OA. This approach is novel in the field of deep learning applications for musculoskeletal imaging and can be expanded to other OA biomarkers
Recommended from our members
Deep Learning for Hierarchical Severity Staging of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries from MRI
PurposeTo evaluate the diagnostic utility of two convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for severity staging of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries.Materials and methodsIn this retrospective study, 1243 knee MR images (1008 intact, 18 partially torn, 77 fully torn, and 140 reconstructed ACLs) from 224 patients (mean age, 47 years ± 14 [standard deviation]; 54% women) were analyzed. The MRI examinations were performed between 2011 and 2014. A modified scoring metric was used. Classification of ACL injuries using deep learning involved use of two types of CNN, one with three-dimensional (3D) and the other with two-dimensional (2D) convolutional kernels. Performance metrics included sensitivity, specificity, weighted Cohen κ, and overall accuracy, and the McNemar test was used to compare the performance of the CNNs.ResultsThe overall accuracies for ACL injury classification using the 3D CNN and 2D CNN were 89% (225 of 254) and 92% (233 of 254), respectively (P = .27), and both CNNs had a weighted Cohen κ of 0.83. The 2D CNN and 3D CNN performed similarly in classifying intact ACLs (2D CNN, sensitivity of 93% [188 of 203] and specificity of 90% [46 of 51] vs 3D CNN, sensitivity of 89% [180 of 203] and specificity of 88% [45 of 51]). Classification of full tears by both networks was also comparable (2D CNN, sensitivity of 82% [14 of 17] and specificity of 94% [222 of 237] vs 3D CNN, sensitivity of 76% [13 of 17] and specificity of 100% [236 of 237]). The 2D CNN classified all reconstructed ACLs correctly.ConclusionTwo-dimensional and 3D CNNs applied to ACL lesion classification had high sensitivity and specificity, suggesting that these networks could be used to help nonexperts grade ACL injuries. Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2020
Erratum: Automatic Deep Learning–assisted Detection and Grading of Abnormalities in Knee MRI Studies
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1148/ryai.2021200165.]
Automatic Deep Learning-assisted Detection and Grading of Abnormalities in Knee MRI Studies.
PurposeTo test the hypothesis that artificial intelligence (AI) techniques can aid in identifying and assessing lesion severity in the cartilage, bone marrow, meniscus, and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) in the knee, improving overall MRI interreader agreement.Materials and methodsThis retrospective study was conducted on 1435 knee MRI studies (n = 294 patients; mean age, 43 years ± 15 [standard deviation]; 153 women) collected within three previous studies (from 2011 to 2014). All MRI studies were acquired using high-spatial-resolution three-dimensional fast-spin-echo CUBE sequence. Three-dimensional convolutional neural networks were developed to detect the regions of interest within MRI studies and grade abnormalities of the cartilage, bone marrow, menisci, and ACL. Evaluation included sensitivity, specificity, and Cohen linear-weighted ĸ. The impact of AI-aided grading in intergrader agreement was assessed on an external dataset.ResultsBinary lesion sensitivity reported for all tissues was between 70% and 88%. Specificity ranged from 85% to 89%. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for all tissues ranged from 0.83 to 0.93. Deep learning-assisted intergrader Cohen ĸ agreement significantly improved in 10 of 16 comparisons among two attending physicians and two trainees for all tissues.ConclusionThe three-dimensional convolutional neural network had high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for knee-lesion-severity scoring and also increased intergrader agreement when used on an external dataset.Supplemental material is available for this article. Keywords: Bone Marrow, Cartilage, Computer Aided Diagnosis (CAD), Computer Applications-3D, Computer Applications-Detection/Diagnosis, Knee, Ligaments, MR-Imaging, Neural Networks, Observer Performance, Segmentation, Statistics © RSNA, 2021See also the commentary by Li and Chang in this issue.: An earlier incorrect version of this article appeared online. This article was corrected on April 16, 2021
Recommended from our members
Computer‐Aided Detection AI Reduces Interreader Variability in Grading Hip Abnormalities With MRI
BackgroundAccurate interpretation of hip MRI is time-intensive and difficult, prone to inter- and intrareviewer variability, and lacks a universally accepted grading scale to evaluate morphological abnormalities.PurposeTo 1) develop and evaluate a deep-learning-based model for binary classification of hip osteoarthritis (OA) morphological abnormalities on MR images, and 2) develop an artificial intelligence (AI)-based assist tool to find if using the model predictions improves interreader agreement in hip grading.Study typeRetrospective study aimed to evaluate a technical development.PopulationA total of 764 MRI volumes (364 patients) obtained from two studies (242 patients from LASEM [FORCe] and 122 patients from UCSF), split into a 65-25-10% train, validation, test set for network training.Field strength/sequence3T MRI, 2D T2 FSE, PD SPAIR.AssessmentAutomatic binary classification of cartilage lesions, bone marrow edema-like lesions, and subchondral cyst-like lesions using the MRNet, interreader agreement before and after using network predictions.Statistical testsReceiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, area under curve (AUC), specificity and sensitivity, and balanced accuracy.ResultsFor cartilage lesions, bone marrow edema-like lesions and subchondral cyst-like lesions the AUCs were: 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.65, 0.95), 0.84 (95% CI 0.67, 1.00), and 0.77 (95% CI 0.66, 0.85), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of the radiologist for binary classification were: 0.79 (95% CI 0.65, 0.93) and 0.80 (95% CI 0.59, 1.02), 0.40 (95% CI -0.02, 0.83) and 0.72 (95% CI 0.59, 0.86), 0.75 (95% CI 0.45, 1.05) and 0.88 (95% CI 0.77, 0.98). The interreader balanced accuracy increased from 53%, 71% and 56% to 60%, 73% and 68% after using the network predictions and saliency maps.Data conclusionWe have shown that a deep-learning approach achieved high performance in clinical classification tasks on hip MR images, and that using the predictions from the deep-learning model improved the interreader agreement in all pathologies.Level of evidence3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;52:1163-1172