47 research outputs found

    Incidence and progression of mild aortic regurgitation after Tirone David reimplantation valve-sparing aortic root replacement

    Get PDF
    ObjectiveThe study objective was to determine whether recurrent or residual mild aortic regurgitation, which occurs after valve-sparing aortic root replacement, progresses over time.MethodsBetween 2003 and 2008, 154 patients underwent Tirone David-V valve-sparing aortic root replacement; 96 patients (62%) had both 1-year (median, 12 ± 4 months) and mid-term (62 ± 22 months) transthoracic echocardiograms available for analysis. Age of patients averaged 38 ± 13 years, 71% were male, 31% had a bicuspid aortic valve, 41% had Marfan syndrome, and 51% underwent aortic valve repair, predominantly cusp free margin shortening.ResultsForty-one patients (43%) had mild aortic regurgitation on 1-year echocardiogram. In 85% of patients (n = 35), mild aortic regurgitation remained stable on the most recent echocardiogram (median, 57 ± 20 months); progression to moderate aortic regurgitation occurred in 5 patients (12%) at a median of 28 ± 18 months and remained stable thereafter; severe aortic regurgitation developed in 1 patient, eventually requiring reoperation. Five patients (5%) had moderate aortic regurgitation at 1 year, which did not progress subsequently. Two patients (2%) had more than moderate aortic regurgitation at 1 year, and both ultimately required reoperation.ConclusionsAlthough mild aortic regurgitation occurs frequently after valve-sparing aortic root replacement, it is unlikely to progress over the next 5 years and should not be interpreted as failure of the valve-preservation concept. Further, we suggest that mild aortic regurgitation should not be considered nonstructural valve dysfunction, as the 2008 valve reporting guidelines would indicate. We need 10- to 15-year follow-up to learn the long-term clinical consequences of mild aortic regurgitation early after valve-sparing aortic root replacement

    Registry of Aortic Diseases to Model Adverse Events and Progression (ROADMAP) in Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection: Study Design and Rationale

    Full text link
    PURPOSE To describe the design and methodological approach of a multicenter, retrospective study to externally validate a clinical and imaging-based model for predicting the risk of late adverse events in patients with initially uncomplicated type B aortic dissection (uTBAD). MATERIALS AND METHODS The Registry of Aortic Diseases to Model Adverse Events and Progression (ROADMAP) is a collaboration between 10 academic aortic centers in North America and Europe. Two centers have previously developed and internally validated a recently developed risk prediction model. Clinical and imaging data from eight ROADMAP centers will be used for external validation. Patients with uTBAD who survived the initial hospitalization between January 1, 2001, and December 31, 2013, with follow-up until 2020, will be retrospectively identified. Clinical and imaging data from the index hospitalization and all follow-up encounters will be collected at each center and transferred to the coordinating center for analysis. Baseline and follow-up CT scans will be evaluated by cardiovascular imaging experts using a standardized technique. RESULTS The primary end point is the occurrence of late adverse events, defined as aneurysm formation (≥6 cm), rapid expansion of the aorta (≥1 cm/y), fatal or nonfatal aortic rupture, new refractory pain, uncontrollable hypertension, and organ or limb malperfusion. The previously derived multivariable model will be externally validated by using Cox proportional hazards regression modeling. CONCLUSION This study will show whether a recent clinical and imaging-based risk prediction model for patients with uTBAD can be generalized to a larger population, which is an important step toward individualized risk stratification and therapy.Keywords: CT Angiography, Vascular, Aorta, Dissection, Outcomes Analysis, Aortic Dissection, MRI, TEVAR© RSNA, 2022See also the commentary by Rajiah in this issue

    Two-year outcomes after transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement.

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: The Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves (PARTNER) trial showed that among high-risk patients with aortic stenosis, the 1-year survival rates are similar with transcatheter aortic-valve replacement (TAVR) and surgical replacement. However, longer-term follow-up is necessary to determine whether TAVR has prolonged benefits. METHODS: At 25 centers, we randomly assigned 699 high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis to undergo either surgical aortic-valve replacement or TAVR. All patients were followed for at least 2 years, with assessment of clinical outcomes and echocardiographic evaluation. RESULTS: The rates of death from any cause were similar in the TAVR and surgery groups (hazard ratio with TAVR, 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71 to 1.15; P=0.41) and at 2 years (Kaplan-Meier analysis) were 33.9% in the TAVR group and 35.0% in the surgery group (P=0.78). The frequency of all strokes during follow-up did not differ significantly between the two groups (hazard ratio, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.67 to 2.23; P=0.52). At 30 days, strokes were more frequent with TAVR than with surgical replacement (4.6% vs. 2.4%, P=0.12); subsequently, there were 8 additional strokes in the TAVR group and 12 in the surgery group. Improvement in valve areas was similar with TAVR and surgical replacement and was maintained for 2 years. Paravalvular regurgitation was more frequent after TAVR (P<0.001), and even mild paravalvular regurgitation was associated with increased late mortality (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A 2-year follow-up of patients in the PARTNER trial supports TAVR as an alternative to surgery in high-risk patients. The two treatments were similar with respect to mortality, reduction in symptoms, and improved valve hemodynamics, but paravalvular regurgitation was more frequent after TAVR and was associated with increased late mortality. (Funded by Edwards Lifesciences; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00530894.)

    Regulated interleukin-10 expression prevents chronic rejection of transplanted hearts

    Get PDF
    AbstractObjectiveInterleukin-10 is a pleiotrophic cytokine with variable effects on the alloimmune response, depending on the experimental model system. The purpose of this study was to determine the role of regulated interleukin-10 expression on the development of chronic rejection in heart transplantation, or cardiac allograft vasculopathy.MethodsDonor hearts from B6.C-H2bm12 mice were transplanted into wild-type and interleukin-10 transgenic recipients. In interleukin-10 transgenic recipients, murine interleukin-10 cytokine is produced under the control of human interleukin-2 promoter. Donor hearts were sacrificed at days 7 and 24. No immunosuppression was used. Intimal proliferation was measured morphometrically. Intragraft cellular infiltrate was defined by both immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry. Intracellular cytokine staining assay was performed to determine both the type and source of intragraft cytokines.ResultsHearts transplanted into wild-type recipients developed severe cardiac allograft vasculopathy by 24 days. Intimal lesions were absent in the donor hearts transplanted into interleukin-10 transgenic recipients. The number of graft-infiltrating T lymphocytes and the percentage of interleukin-2/interferon-γ producing T lymphocytes were markedly reduced in interleukin-10 transgenic recipients. Finally, the overexpression of interleukin-10 resulted in the decline of graft-infiltrating macrophages at all time points.ConclusionsRegulated expression of interleukin-10 inhibits cardiac allograft vasculopathy development via reduction of mononuclear cell recruitment and alteration of their cytokine profile. This strategy may prove beneficial in controlling the alloimmune response in solid organ transplants.3

    Relative strain is a novel predictor of aneurysmal degeneration of the thoracic aorta: An ex vivo mechanical study.

    No full text
    ObjectiveCurrent guidelines for prophylactic replacement of the thoracic aorta, primarily based on size alone, may not be adequate in identifying patients at risk for either progression of disease or aortic catastrophe. We undertook the current study to determine whether the mechanical properties of the aorta might be able to predict aneurysmal dilatation of the aorta using a clinical database and benchtop mechanical testing of human aortic tissue.MethodsUsing over 400 samples from 31 patients, mechanical properties were studied in (a) normal aorta and then (b) between normal and diseased aorta using linear mixed-effects models. A machine learning technique was used to predict aortic growth rate over time using mechanical properties and baseline clinical characteristics.ResultsHealthy aortic tissue under in vivo loading conditions, after accounting for aortic segment location, had lower longitudinal elastic modulus compared with circumferential elastic modulus: -166.8 kPa (95% confidence interval [CI]: -210.8 to -122.7, P &lt; .001). Fracture toughness was also lower in the longitudinal vs circumferential direction: -201.2 J/m3 (95% CI: -272.9 to -129.5, P &lt; .001). Finally, relative strain was lower in the longitudinal direction compared with the circumferential direction: -0.01 (95% CI: -0.02 to -0.004, P = .002). Patients with diseased aorta, after accounting for segment location and sample direction, had decreased toughness compared with normal aorta, -431.7 J/m3 (95% CI: -628.6 to -234.8, P &lt; .001), and increased relative strain, 0.09 (95% CI: 0.04 to 0.14, P = .003).ConclusionsIncreasing relative strain was identified as a novel independent predictor of aneurysmal degeneration. Noninvasive measurement of relative strain may aid in the identification and monitoring of patients at risk for aneurysmal degeneration. (JVS-Vascular Science 2021;2:1-12.).Clinical relevanceAortic aneurysm surveillance and prophylactic surgical recommendations are based on computed tomographic angiogram aortic dimensions and growth rate measurements. However, aortic catastrophes may occur at small sizes, confounding current risk stratification models. Herein, we report that increasing aortic relative strain, that is, greater distensibility, is associated with growth over time, thus potentially identifying patients at risk for dissection/rupture
    corecore