Frequency of feces disposal sites of pre-ambulatory children by site of defecation (n = 40).

<p>*Includes: washing, washing clothes, and cleaning it in water.</p

Frequency of feces disposal sites of ambulatory children by site of defecation (n = 105).

<p>Frequency of feces disposal sites of ambulatory children by site of defecation (n = 105).</p

Bivariate analysis assessing association between household characteristics and safe disposal of child feces among households with a latrine (n = 114 children from 106 households).

1<p>Wald test.</p>2<p>Paper, roadside, inside compound, inside household, in open field.</p>3<p>Potty, nappy.</p>4<p>used robust standard errors without GEE as not possible.</p>5<p>dropped from analysis.</p>6<p>checked or reported.</p><p>Note 1: Denominators vary as not all respondents answered all questions.</p><p>Note 2: Due to the small sample size of the study and the rare occurrence of safe feces disposal, it was not possible to conduct multivariate analysis beyond restricting the analysis to households owning a latrine, therefore these crude odds ratios should be interpreted cautiously.</p

Village, year of implementation, implementing partner, coverage and use.

*<p>Percentage of households that reported at least one member used the latrine sometimes.</p>**<p>Percentage of household members that were reported to be using the latrine all of the time.</p>***<p>Awarded Nirmal Gram Puraskar and open defecation free status.</p

Multivariable regression analysis of factors associated with latrine use.

<p>Denominators vary as not all respondents answered all questions. Use is based on reported use.</p>**<p>Closure over entry and roof assessed in a model which excluded walls because no latrines without walls had a roof or door.</p>***<p>A functional latrine is defined as a latrine which has walls over 1.5 meters, some type of closure over the entry, an unbroken and unblocked pan and a connected and functional pan-pipe-pit connection.</p><p>aORs for functional latrines assessed in a model which included village, household construction, pit covering and length of time since latrine has been built.</p

Multivariable regression analysis of factors associated with latrine coverage.

<p>Denominators vary as not all respondents answered all questions.</p

Household characteristics of participating pre-ambulatory and ambulatory children.

1<p>only among households with latrines.</p>2<p>Pucca  = concrete; Kuccha  = mud and dung.</p>3<p>checked or reported.</p

Reported place of defecation for individuals in households where there is a latrine <i>N = 1933.</i>

<p>Reported place of defecation for individuals in households where there is a latrine <i>N = 1933.</i></p

Latrine Characteristics.

*<p>Walls over 1.5 meters, some type of closure over the entry, unbroken and unblocked pan and a functional pan-pipe-pit connection.</p><p>NGO Non-Governmental Organizations.</p

Primary stove adoption and use outcomes.

<p>*Only records within 1.5 IQR were included.</p