18 research outputs found
How adults with a profound intellectual disability engage others in interaction
Using video records of everyday life in a residential home, we report on what
interactional practices are used by people with severe and profound
intellectual disabilities to initiate encounters. There were very few initiations,
and all presented difficulties to the interlocutor; one (which we call "blank
recipiency") gave the interlocutor virtually no information at all on which to
base a response. Only when the initiation was of a new phase in an interaction
already under way (for example, the initiation of an alternative trajectory of a
proposed physical move) was it likely to be successfully sustained. We show
how interlocutors (support staff; the recording researcher) responded to
initiations verbally, as if to neurotypical speakers - but inappropriately for
people unable to comprehend, or to produce well-fitted next turns. This misreliance
on ordinary speakers' conversational practices was one factor that
contributed to residents abandoning the interaction in almost all cases. We
discuss the dilemma confronting care workers
The staff are your friends : Intellectually disabled identities in official discourse and interactional practice.
Talk between care staff and people with learning disabilities may reveal a conflict between official policy and actual social practice. We explore a case in which care staff are in the process of soliciting residents' views on ‘relationships’. Ostensibly, this is an empowering part of a group meeting, meant to help the residents understand their relationships with the people around them, and to value those which are positive. However, the talk mutates from solicitation to instruction and, in doing so, provides a vivid case of people with learning disabilities being attributed social rights more limited than is consistent with institutional service policy. We unpack the play of category membership in this episode to illustrate how conflicting agendas can lead to the construction, even in ostensibly empowering encounters, of identities actively disavowed at the level of official discourse