Numbers of marked and recaptured <i>Sympetrum depressiusculum</i> on each transect, and mean and maximum distances travelled in the landscape.

<p>Numbers of marked and recaptured <i>Sympetrum depressiusculum</i> on each transect, and mean and maximum distances travelled in the landscape.</p

Significance of selected factors to the distribution of <i>S. depressiusculum</i> individuals.

<p>Significance of selected factors to the distribution of <i>S. depressiusculum</i> individuals.</p

Probability of individual adult <i>Sympetrum depressiusculum</i> dispersing a given distance, estimated from regression-based models (inverse power function, IPF; negative exponential function, NEF) and observed data.

<p>R² is the coefficient of determination.</p

Probability of individual adult <i>Sympetrum depressiusculum</i> dispersing a given distance, estimated from regression-based models (inverse power function, IPF; negative exponential function, NEF).

<p>Probability of individual adult <i>Sympetrum depressiusculum</i> dispersing a given distance, estimated from regression-based models (inverse power function, IPF; negative exponential function, NEF).</p

Schematic representation of all recorded moves between natal site and terrestrial patches.

<p>There are only five females (E, H, J, T and 8), all others are males.</p

Daily estimates of <i>Sympetrum depressiusculum</i> population size at the natal site.

<p>Daily estimates of <i>Sympetrum depressiusculum</i> population size at the natal site.</p

Numbers of individual <i>Sympetrum depressiusculum</i> marked and recaptured at the natal site.

<p>Numbers of individual <i>Sympetrum depressiusculum</i> marked and recaptured at the natal site.</p

Results of the Jolly–Seber analysis (POPAN module in MARK): selected models, numbers of model parameters (K), estimates of average longevity (<i>Long.</i>) [days], and total estimated population size (<i>N</i>) for male and female <i>Sympetrum depressiusculum</i>.

<p>* Models were selected according to the Akaike information criterion (AIC). The model with the lowest AIC value and the model with ΔAICc ≤2.00 are shown.</p

Map of the study area showing the four research transects, locations of individual records of adults, and habitat preferences of adults.

<p>A) 7 July–8 August 2012; B) 9 August–6 September 2012; C) 7 September–10 October 2012; D) home-range extent divided into three time stages, see previous description – A, B, C. Adults were present only on heavily vegetated surfaces and were absent from areas in agricultural production patches after the harvest.</p